Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska No 175.6 (172.0, 179.3) N/A 1,825 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Morrill County Yes 102.0 (61.1, 164.8) 72 (26, 72) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Franklin County No 219.6 (142.8, 333.1) 10 (1, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Antelope County No 154.4 (105.7, 220.2) 58 (6, 72) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Dakota County No 158.6 (124.4, 199.1) 55 (12, 71) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Cherry County No 132.6 (88.5, 194.1) 69 (12, 72) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Howard County No 147.6 (101.9, 209.4) 61 (8, 72) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Polk County Yes 108.7 (68.2, 169.5) 71 (30, 72) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Cedar County No 136.0 (97.8, 186.3) 66 (16, 72) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Dixon County No 134.2 (88.5, 198.6) 67 (10, 72) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Stanton County No 133.0 (85.2, 199.6) 68 (10, 72) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Cass County No 173.8 (144.9, 207.0) 36 (9, 67) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Hamilton County No 171.6 (127.7, 227.1) 42 (5, 71) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Adams County No 166.2 (141.0, 194.8) 48 (13, 67) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Sarpy County No 165.7 (152.5, 179.8) 49 (25, 61) 123 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Holt County No 142.3 (106.5, 188.1) 64 (16, 72) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Kearney County No 168.2 (119.1, 233.1) 45 (4, 72) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Madison County No 158.9 (134.5, 186.6) 54 (18, 69) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Saunders County No 173.3 (143.1, 208.5) 39 (9, 67) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Douglas County No 188.0 (180.2, 196.1) 24 (16, 40) 466 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Furnas County No 233.4 (163.4, 326.5) 8 (1, 67) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Lancaster County No 170.1 (160.5, 180.0) 43 (25, 57) 251 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Thayer County No 185.5 (128.1, 264.1) 27 (2, 71) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Washington County No 201.1 (165.8, 242.0) 17 (4, 59) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Red Willow County No 185.1 (143.1, 236.9) 28 (3, 68) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Buffalo County No 175.9 (152.5, 201.8) 34 (12, 63) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Gage County No 187.6 (157.7, 222.0) 25 (6, 61) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Nuckolls County No 211.5 (152.6, 293.6) 15 (1, 68) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Otoe County No 174.8 (140.7, 215.5) 35 (8, 69) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pierce County No 146.9 (102.1, 206.7) 62 (9, 72) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
York County No 188.7 (150.5, 234.5) 22 (4, 66) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Hall County No 167.3 (147.6, 188.8) 46 (18, 64) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Keith County No 167.1 (123.8, 223.3) 47 (6, 72) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Platte County No 164.8 (140.0, 192.8) 51 (15, 67) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Valley County No 145.3 (93.7, 221.8) 63 (7, 72) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Box Butte County No 173.3 (128.9, 228.7) 38 (5, 71) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cuming County No 161.7 (118.7, 216.8) 53 (7, 72) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Dawson County No 151.3 (123.2, 184.1) 59 (17, 71) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Hitchcock County No 246.2 (158.2, 373.9) 5 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Richardson County No 196.3 (150.6, 254.6) 20 (2, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Seward County No 169.2 (134.9, 210.1) 44 (8, 69) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Cheyenne County No 179.6 (134.7, 235.9) 31 (5, 70) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Nemaha County No 164.9 (116.6, 228.7) 50 (5, 72) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Chase County No 218.8 (148.4, 316.1) 12 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Colfax County No 129.8 (89.8, 181.3) 70 (16, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Kimball County No 237.6 (165.0, 338.3) 7 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Lincoln County No 176.5 (152.4, 203.7) 33 (10, 63) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Clay County No 188.2 (131.8, 262.2) 23 (2, 71) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Dawes County No 196.2 (144.3, 262.2) 21 (2, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Fillmore County No 231.0 (170.9, 309.3) 9 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Scotts Bluff County No 186.5 (161.0, 215.2) 26 (7, 61) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Brown County No 173.1 (108.4, 273.3) 40 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Pawnee County No 155.2 (88.5, 265.5) 57 (2, 72) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Phelps County No 172.2 (128.8, 227.2) 41 (6, 71) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Johnson County No 240.6 (171.8, 330.0) 6 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Merrick County No 215.2 (163.5, 280.0) 14 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Saline County No 177.9 (137.7, 226.5) 32 (6, 70) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Sherman County No 162.1 (101.9, 257.4) 52 (2, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Burt County No 199.7 (146.9, 268.6) 19 (2, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Custer County No 156.4 (117.8, 204.8) 56 (9, 72) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Dodge County No 205.4 (180.0, 233.8) 16 (5, 47) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Webster County No 276.5 (188.0, 396.6) 1 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Boone County No 151.1 (102.1, 219.9) 60 (6, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Thurston County No 250.4 (175.8, 345.4) 4 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Wayne County No 141.7 (99.7, 196.6) 65 (12, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Butler County No 265.8 (208.4, 336.0) 2 (1, 42) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Perkins County No 216.5 (139.1, 329.0) 13 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Sheridan County No 173.5 (120.5, 246.2) 37 (3, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Jefferson County No 200.0 (152.3, 261.5) 18 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Knox County No 184.2 (139.7, 240.9) 29 (3, 69) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Nance County No 256.5 (167.3, 379.4) 3 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Boyd County No 219.1 (113.6, 394.5) 11 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Harlan County No 182.4 (120.2, 275.2) 30 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Arthur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/29/2024 4:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top