Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank ascending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 128.5 (125.7, 131.4) N/A 1,660 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Chase County Rural Yes 93.4 (52.7, 161.4) 71 (7, 71) 3 falling falling trend -10.0 (-21.4, -4.0)
Saline County Rural Yes 94.0 (67.5, 128.2) 70 (25, 71) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Cuming County Rural Yes 95.7 (65.8, 137.1) 69 (18, 71) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Sheridan County Rural Yes 96.8 (61.3, 152.9) 68 (9, 71) 5 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.1)
Fillmore County Rural Yes 98.2 (65.0, 149.6) 67 (12, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Knox County Rural Yes 99.4 (69.9, 140.9) 66 (17, 71) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
York County Rural Yes 100.8 (75.9, 132.7) 65 (21, 71) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Howard County Urban Yes 101.7 (66.3, 153.3) 64 (9, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Burt County Rural Yes 103.4 (67.1, 156.0) 63 (9, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Hamilton County Rural Yes 108.1 (75.5, 151.9) 62 (11, 71) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Antelope County Rural Yes 110.8 (71.8, 167.2) 61 (6, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Madison County Rural Yes 112.9 (93.9, 134.8) 60 (21, 69) 28 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Custer County Rural Yes 113.8 (83.2, 154.0) 59 (8, 71) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Kearney County Rural Yes 114.7 (73.8, 172.2) 58 (5, 71) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Phelps County Rural Yes 117.8 (84.6, 162.0) 57 (7, 71) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Lancaster County Urban Yes 117.8 (110.8, 125.1) 56 (34, 61) 223 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Merrick County Urban Yes 118.3 (80.5, 170.2) 55 (5, 71) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Pierce County Rural Yes 119.3 (82.8, 169.7) 54 (5, 71) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Washington County Urban Yes 119.6 (95.5, 148.7) 53 (11, 69) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Holt County Rural Yes 119.6 (87.2, 162.4) 52 (7, 71) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Furnas County Rural Yes 119.8 (72.8, 191.2) 51 (2, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-7.8, 15.3)
Buffalo County Rural Yes 120.2 (103.2, 139.3) 50 (16, 66) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural Yes 121.0 (82.5, 172.5) 49 (4, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Scotts Bluff County Rural Yes 122.2 (103.4, 143.7) 48 (15, 67) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Cherry County Rural Yes 122.7 (77.7, 187.8) 47 (3, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Cass County Urban No 123.7 (101.3, 150.2) 46 (10, 68) 23 falling falling trend -19.1 (-32.5, -0.8)
Stanton County Rural No 123.8 (79.1, 187.5) 45 (3, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Thayer County Rural No 123.9 (79.9, 189.2) 44 (3, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Boone County Rural No 124.9 (87.1, 180.5) 43 (4, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Sherman County Rural No 125.7 (67.5, 224.3) 42 (2, 71) 4
*
*
Morrill County Rural No 128.4 (79.5, 201.3) 41 (3, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Harlan County Rural No 128.8 (77.1, 216.6) 40 (2, 71) 4
*
*
Clay County Rural No 128.9 (83.9, 192.4) 39 (3, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Platte County Rural No 129.9 (109.1, 153.8) 38 (9, 65) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Dakota County Urban No 130.1 (102.3, 163.4) 37 (7, 69) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Dawson County Rural No 130.1 (105.1, 159.7) 36 (8, 67) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Hall County Urban No 130.2 (114.3, 147.9) 35 (14, 61) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Douglas County Urban No 131.0 (125.4, 136.7) 34 (23, 49) 436 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.3)
Valley County Rural No 135.6 (78.5, 221.6) 33 (2, 71) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Sarpy County Urban No 136.0 (125.8, 146.9) 32 (15, 49) 134 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Colfax County Rural No 138.8 (97.0, 192.8) 31 (3, 70) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Seward County Urban No 139.1 (110.2, 174.1) 30 (4, 66) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Adams County Rural No 139.3 (117.6, 164.1) 29 (7, 60) 32 falling falling trend -14.3 (-25.1, -1.4)
Polk County Rural No 139.6 (91.1, 209.3) 28 (2, 71) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.6)
Johnson County Rural No 139.8 (88.9, 216.2) 27 (2, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Cedar County Rural No 140.2 (99.8, 193.6) 26 (3, 70) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Otoe County Rural No 142.0 (113.1, 177.2) 25 (4, 65) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Saunders County Urban No 142.6 (117.0, 172.9) 24 (5, 61) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Keith County Rural No 144.6 (106.7, 194.9) 23 (3, 68) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Box Butte County Rural No 144.6 (109.4, 189.1) 22 (3, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Butler County Rural No 144.7 (103.9, 198.2) 21 (3, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Red Willow County Rural No 145.3 (109.1, 191.1) 20 (3, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Richardson County Rural No 148.5 (107.9, 202.3) 19 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Dodge County Rural No 149.4 (128.9, 172.5) 18 (5, 51) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Dawes County Rural No 150.5 (107.4, 207.4) 17 (2, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.8)
Dixon County Rural No 150.6 (103.7, 216.0) 16 (2, 70) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Nuckolls County Rural No 150.6 (96.6, 231.7) 15 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 150.7 (130.4, 173.7) 14 (5, 53) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Kimball County Rural No 152.3 (88.2, 251.6) 13 (1, 71) 4 falling falling trend -39.8 (-58.9, -1.4)
Boyd County Rural No 153.2 (90.3, 278.8) 12 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Gage County Rural No 158.6 (131.8, 189.9) 11 (3, 50) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 160.0 (119.1, 214.2) 10 (2, 65) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Garden County Rural No 160.0 (95.6, 288.3) 9 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Nance County Rural No 160.1 (96.9, 256.5) 8 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.4)
Franklin County Rural No 164.3 (101.9, 263.3) 7 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.6)
Nemaha County Rural No 172.5 (124.3, 235.5) 6 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Cheyenne County Rural No 172.7 (129.7, 226.9) 5 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Greeley County Rural No 179.6 (88.7, 329.0) 4 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Webster County Rural No 180.1 (117.7, 273.2) 3 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.7, 16.7)
Hitchcock County Rural No 245.8 (156.2, 378.2) 2 (1, 51) 6 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 5.0)
Thurston County Rural No 291.0 (210.8, 390.9) 1 (1, 10) 9
*
*
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 1:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top