Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska No 150.6 (148.3, 152.9) N/A 3,504 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
York County No 142.9 (120.3, 168.9) 57 (11, 78) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Webster County No 214.5 (162.9, 280.3) 3 (1, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Wayne County No 124.4 (96.1, 159.0) 71 (15, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Washington County No 159.1 (138.2, 182.6) 30 (7, 70) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Valley County No 132.9 (98.1, 179.4) 66 (7, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Thurston County No 242.1 (191.0, 302.5) 2 (1, 29) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Thayer County No 153.0 (115.6, 200.8) 40 (4, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Stanton County Yes 120.2 (88.1, 161.3) 77 (12, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Sherman County No 127.2 (86.5, 185.5) 70 (6, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Sheridan County No 143.9 (111.7, 185.2) 54 (6, 80) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Seward County No 163.2 (139.8, 189.8) 23 (5, 70) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Scotts Bluff County No 150.9 (135.5, 167.7) 41 (14, 70) 76 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Saunders County No 153.9 (134.3, 175.7) 39 (10, 71) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Sarpy County No 144.7 (136.6, 153.2) 52 (29, 67) 247 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Saline County No 162.5 (135.6, 193.3) 25 (5, 71) 27 stable stable trend -13.3 (-28.5, 5.0)
Rock County Yes 114.8 (65.0, 205.0) 79 (3, 81) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Richardson County No 167.9 (138.2, 203.5) 18 (3, 72) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Red Willow County No 171.9 (143.6, 204.8) 14 (3, 70) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Polk County No 123.9 (91.4, 166.3) 72 (12, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Platte County No 149.7 (133.4, 167.6) 45 (14, 71) 65 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Pierce County No 138.7 (107.7, 176.9) 59 (6, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Phelps County No 157.9 (129.1, 192.1) 35 (5, 76) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Perkins County No 160.4 (112.0, 226.5) 27 (2, 80) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Pawnee County No 144.2 (89.2, 223.0) 53 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Otoe County No 145.3 (124.1, 169.6) 49 (11, 78) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Nuckolls County No 171.2 (132.3, 221.7) 15 (2, 76) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Nemaha County No 168.2 (133.1, 210.7) 17 (3, 75) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Nance County No 199.6 (146.2, 268.4) 7 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Morrill County Yes 106.1 (75.7, 147.1) 80 (26, 81) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Merrick County No 158.0 (127.0, 195.2) 34 (4, 78) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Madison County No 137.8 (122.2, 154.9) 60 (24, 77) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Loup County No 294.0 (158.3, 528.3) 1 (1, 80) 3
*
*
Lincoln County No 163.4 (147.6, 180.6) 22 (8, 59) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Lancaster County No 141.9 (136.1, 147.9) 58 (38, 67) 472 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Knox County No 123.3 (98.4, 154.1) 74 (18, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Kimball County No 205.9 (156.2, 269.7) 6 (1, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Keith County No 159.0 (129.1, 195.0) 32 (4, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Kearney County No 154.7 (120.9, 196.1) 38 (4, 79) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Johnson County No 177.0 (136.0, 228.3) 9 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Jefferson County No 164.8 (134.8, 201.3) 21 (3, 75) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Howard County No 136.8 (105.5, 175.8) 63 (8, 81) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Holt County No 134.3 (108.8, 164.9) 65 (14, 80) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Hitchcock County No 214.1 (153.4, 294.6) 4 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Harlan County No 147.6 (107.1, 203.0) 47 (4, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Hamilton County No 147.1 (118.7, 181.0) 48 (7, 79) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Hall County No 150.0 (137.4, 163.5) 44 (17, 67) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Greeley County Yes 119.7 (74.9, 187.4) 78 (6, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Gosper County No 144.9 (89.1, 228.5) 50 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Garfield County No 137.6 (85.9, 217.8) 61 (2, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Garden County No 174.8 (110.8, 269.9) 11 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Gage County No 160.1 (140.9, 181.6) 28 (7, 66) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Furnas County No 177.0 (133.7, 231.6) 10 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Frontier County Yes 88.2 (54.1, 142.4) 81 (31, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Franklin County No 159.2 (113.1, 222.7) 29 (2, 81) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Fillmore County No 165.6 (130.4, 209.5) 19 (2, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Dundy County No 123.6 (74.8, 202.8) 73 (3, 81) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Douglas County No 156.5 (151.9, 161.3) 36 (21, 48) 900 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Dodge County No 181.6 (165.1, 199.5) 8 (4, 38) 96 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Dixon County No 144.8 (110.1, 188.5) 51 (4, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Deuel County No 165.3 (109.2, 249.9) 20 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Dawson County No 132.5 (114.3, 152.8) 67 (23, 79) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Dawes County No 172.7 (138.6, 213.5) 13 (2, 73) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Dakota County No 158.2 (134.9, 184.5) 33 (7, 73) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Custer County No 135.0 (110.4, 164.2) 64 (13, 80) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Cuming County No 123.1 (97.2, 154.6) 75 (20, 81) 18 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Colfax County No 127.3 (99.3, 160.9) 69 (14, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Clay County No 143.5 (109.2, 186.1) 56 (6, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Cheyenne County No 159.0 (129.2, 194.2) 31 (5, 77) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Cherry County Yes 121.8 (91.2, 160.9) 76 (14, 81) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Chase County No 170.5 (126.6, 227.0) 16 (2, 79) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Cedar County No 137.4 (109.9, 170.9) 62 (10, 80) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Cass County No 154.9 (136.3, 175.5) 37 (10, 71) 53 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Butler County No 207.0 (172.0, 248.1) 5 (1, 43) 26 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 6.9)
Burt County No 163.1 (128.7, 205.3) 24 (3, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Buffalo County No 150.7 (136.3, 166.3) 42 (15, 68) 84 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Brown County No 143.5 (97.5, 207.7) 55 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Boyd County No 174.6 (110.1, 270.1) 12 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Box Butte County No 148.2 (120.9, 180.2) 46 (7, 78) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Boone County No 150.7 (116.0, 194.6) 43 (4, 80) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Antelope County No 128.9 (98.3, 167.6) 68 (10, 81) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Adams County No 161.5 (144.4, 180.1) 26 (8, 62) 70 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Arthur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 4:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top