Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A Yes 44.1 (42.7, 45.5) N/A 886 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.5, 0.1)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Thurston County Rural Yes 99.5 (63.6, 147.7) 1 (1, 27) 5
*
*
Furnas County Rural Yes 67.6 (36.5, 116.1) 2 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Dawes County Rural Yes 67.5 (41.8, 103.5) 3 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.3)
Cheyenne County Rural Yes 66.2 (44.3, 95.8) 4 (1, 44) 7
*
*
Clay County Rural Yes 62.0 (35.9, 100.5) 5 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Nemaha County Rural Yes 61.6 (37.5, 96.2) 6 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Gage County Rural Yes 61.5 (47.7, 78.4) 7 (1, 35) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Burt County Rural Yes 59.6 (34.8, 96.4) 8 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Johnson County Rural Yes 58.5 (34.5, 95.6) 9 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Butler County Rural Yes 57.9 (37.0, 87.5) 10 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Dodge County Rural Yes 57.1 (46.6, 69.4) 11 (3, 35) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Cuming County Rural Yes 55.4 (35.5, 83.5) 12 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Richardson County Rural Yes 54.6 (35.1, 83.0) 13 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.8)
Merrick County Urban Yes 53.9 (32.8, 84.7) 14 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Custer County Rural Yes 53.9 (35.5, 79.2) 15 (2, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Colfax County Rural Yes 50.7 (32.0, 76.3) 16 (2, 50) 5
*
*
Otoe County Rural Yes 50.3 (36.3, 68.6) 17 (3, 49) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Cedar County Rural Yes 50.1 (29.8, 79.8) 18 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Antelope County Rural Yes 50.0 (27.0, 85.8) 19 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.0)
Pierce County Rural Yes 50.0 (30.6, 78.7) 20 (2, 50) 5
*
*
Box Butte County Rural Yes 49.1 (32.1, 72.5) 21 (2, 50) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.5)
Keith County Rural Yes 48.6 (28.7, 78.3) 22 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Holt County Rural Yes 48.6 (29.6, 75.6) 23 (2, 50) 5
*
*
Adams County Rural Yes 48.0 (37.4, 60.8) 24 (5, 48) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Scotts Bluff County Rural Yes 47.8 (37.7, 59.9) 25 (6, 47) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Phelps County Rural Yes 47.3 (29.7, 72.6) 26 (2, 50) 5
*
*
Saunders County Urban Yes 47.0 (35.5, 61.5) 27 (5, 49) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Washington County Urban Yes 46.6 (34.6, 61.7) 28 (5, 49) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Wayne County Rural Yes 46.1 (27.1, 73.8) 29 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.9)
Howard County Urban Yes 45.7 (26.0, 76.6) 30 (2, 50) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.8)
Madison County Rural Yes 45.4 (35.5, 57.3) 31 (7, 48) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Douglas County Urban Yes 43.9 (41.5, 46.4) 32 (20, 40) 256 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Lancaster County Urban Yes 42.9 (39.6, 46.5) 33 (20, 43) 128 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 7.0)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 42.2 (25.5, 68.4) 34 (3, 50) 4
*
*
Dixon County Rural Yes 41.9 (23.1, 72.9) 35 (3, 50) 3
*
*
Seward County Urban Yes 41.3 (28.7, 58.0) 36 (7, 50) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 41.0 (32.3, 51.5) 37 (12, 50) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Kearney County Rural Yes 40.8 (22.5, 69.7) 38 (3, 50) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.9)
Hall County Urban Yes 40.7 (33.7, 48.9) 39 (15, 49) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Buffalo County Rural Yes 40.3 (32.4, 49.7) 40 (14, 50) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Saline County Rural Yes 40.0 (26.8, 57.9) 41 (8, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Cass County Urban Yes 39.9 (29.9, 52.4) 42 (11, 50) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Platte County Rural Yes 38.9 (29.5, 50.4) 43 (12, 50) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
York County Rural Yes 38.7 (25.7, 56.5) 44 (8, 50) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Knox County Rural Yes 38.1 (20.9, 64.8) 45 (4, 50) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Hamilton County Rural Yes 37.7 (21.6, 61.7) 46 (5, 50) 4
*
*
Red Willow County Rural Yes 36.1 (21.3, 57.9) 47 (6, 50) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.3)
Sarpy County Urban Yes 35.8 (32.1, 39.9) 48 (31, 49) 68 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Dakota County Urban Yes 33.0 (22.5, 46.7) 49 (18, 50) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Dawson County Rural Yes 32.9 (23.1, 45.7) 50 (19, 50) 8 falling falling trend -8.3 (-30.9, -2.3)
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nuckolls County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thayer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top