Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska No 152.8 (150.4, 155.2) N/A 3,251 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Adams County No 168.3 (150.3, 188.1) 21 (6, 61) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Antelope County No 131.4 (100.0, 171.2) 69 (10, 81) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Boone County No 151.9 (116.8, 196.6) 45 (4, 80) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Box Butte County No 146.8 (118.2, 181.1) 51 (8, 79) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Boyd County No 179.7 (112.2, 280.9) 11 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Brown County No 145.4 (98.2, 211.9) 54 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Buffalo County No 154.5 (139.5, 170.8) 43 (14, 68) 82 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Burt County No 161.5 (127.0, 204.2) 30 (3, 78) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Butler County No 208.8 (173.3, 250.6) 5 (1, 46) 26 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.1, 7.0)
Cass County No 157.2 (138.3, 178.3) 38 (9, 71) 53 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Cedar County No 138.9 (111.1, 172.9) 63 (10, 80) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Chase County No 172.4 (126.6, 233.2) 19 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Cherry County No 125.9 (93.8, 167.5) 74 (13, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Cheyenne County No 160.5 (129.7, 197.3) 32 (4, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Clay County No 149.0 (113.1, 194.2) 47 (4, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Colfax County No 147.5 (110.5, 194.7) 50 (5, 80) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Cuming County No 128.4 (100.8, 162.5) 72 (15, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Custer County No 137.6 (112.4, 167.7) 65 (13, 80) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Dakota County No 175.2 (146.5, 208.9) 16 (3, 67) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Dawes County No 181.4 (145.1, 225.2) 10 (2, 73) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Dawson County No 139.7 (119.1, 163.6) 62 (18, 79) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Deuel County No 161.8 (105.0, 250.7) 29 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Dixon County No 151.1 (114.0, 198.9) 46 (4, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Dodge County No 186.7 (169.2, 205.6) 8 (3, 37) 93 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Douglas County No 155.7 (150.7, 160.9) 40 (24, 53) 758 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Dundy County No 127.0 (76.8, 212.2) 73 (3, 81) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Fillmore County No 167.9 (132.1, 212.9) 22 (3, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Franklin County No 161.9 (114.8, 227.2) 28 (1, 81) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Frontier County Yes 89.4 (54.8, 145.0) 81 (32, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Furnas County No 177.0 (133.2, 232.8) 13 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Gage County No 159.6 (140.3, 181.2) 33 (9, 68) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Garden County No 177.9 (110.2, 280.7) 12 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Garfield County No 139.9 (87.0, 221.8) 61 (2, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.9)
Gosper County No 135.8 (82.5, 219.1) 67 (2, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Greeley County Yes 121.5 (75.9, 190.9) 77 (5, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Hall County No 158.3 (144.3, 173.4) 35 (12, 64) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Hamilton County No 144.3 (116.1, 178.2) 58 (8, 80) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Harlan County No 144.1 (104.5, 199.2) 59 (5, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Hitchcock County No 214.3 (152.6, 296.8) 3 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Holt County No 137.8 (111.3, 169.7) 64 (12, 80) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Howard County No 137.2 (105.6, 176.9) 66 (8, 81) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 168.5 (137.8, 206.0) 20 (3, 74) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Johnson County No 182.2 (138.5, 238.0) 9 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Kearney County No 157.8 (122.9, 200.8) 36 (3, 79) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Keith County No 154.9 (124.9, 191.7) 42 (5, 78) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Kimball County No 207.9 (155.9, 276.0) 6 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Knox County Yes 120.1 (95.1, 151.8) 78 (23, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lancaster County No 145.8 (139.7, 152.1) 53 (35, 66) 446 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Lincoln County No 163.3 (147.1, 181.1) 25 (9, 63) 78 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Loup County No 300.9 (160.8, 545.5) 1 (1, 80) 3
*
*
Madison County No 144.6 (127.7, 163.3) 56 (19, 74) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Merrick County No 162.0 (130.1, 200.6) 27 (3, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Morrill County Yes 109.8 (77.3, 155.0) 80 (21, 81) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Nance County No 203.1 (148.2, 274.2) 7 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Nemaha County No 172.6 (136.5, 216.6) 18 (2, 75) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Nuckolls County No 173.2 (133.2, 225.4) 17 (2, 77) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Otoe County No 148.1 (126.1, 173.4) 48 (11, 76) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Pawnee County No 147.5 (90.6, 229.3) 49 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Perkins County No 163.1 (113.7, 231.2) 26 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Phelps County No 158.9 (129.8, 193.8) 34 (5, 76) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Pierce County No 140.8 (109.3, 179.7) 60 (8, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Platte County No 155.3 (137.7, 174.8) 41 (11, 71) 63 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.9)
Polk County No 124.6 (91.5, 168.3) 75 (12, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Red Willow County No 175.7 (146.5, 210.0) 14 (3, 67) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Richardson County No 164.4 (134.7, 200.4) 23 (4, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Rock County Yes 111.1 (61.6, 203.0) 79 (5, 81) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Saline County No 175.4 (144.8, 211.3) 15 (2, 70) 26 stable stable trend -13.2 (-29.4, 6.7)
Sarpy County No 146.6 (138.0, 155.6) 52 (28, 67) 226 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Saunders County No 156.1 (136.2, 178.4) 39 (10, 72) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Scotts Bluff County No 157.4 (140.3, 176.3) 37 (11, 69) 69 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Seward County No 163.6 (139.9, 190.5) 24 (6, 71) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Sheridan County No 144.3 (110.7, 189.2) 57 (6, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Sherman County No 128.7 (87.2, 188.6) 71 (5, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Stanton County No 123.1 (90.1, 165.6) 76 (14, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Thayer County No 153.4 (115.1, 202.5) 44 (3, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Thurston County No 245.4 (181.0, 329.9) 2 (1, 59) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Valley County No 131.9 (96.9, 179.1) 68 (6, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Washington County No 160.8 (139.5, 184.7) 31 (7, 70) 43 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Wayne County No 129.3 (99.6, 165.8) 70 (12, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Webster County No 209.0 (158.2, 275.1) 4 (1, 69) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
York County No 145.2 (122.1, 172.1) 55 (11, 78) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Arthur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 8:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top