Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 31.7 (30.7, 32.8) N/A 773 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -3.0)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Thurston County Rural No 80.0 (50.7, 119.6) 1 (1, 17) 5
*
*
Hitchcock County Rural No 62.1 (35.3, 109.4) 2 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Jefferson County Rural No 49.6 (34.2, 71.8) 3 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.4)
Dixon County Rural No 48.4 (29.0, 77.5) 4 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Nuckolls County Rural No 44.8 (25.8, 77.0) 5 (1, 45) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.6, -0.5)
Polk County Rural No 43.0 (25.1, 71.2) 6 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Dodge County Rural No 42.2 (34.6, 51.1) 7 (2, 30) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Nemaha County Rural No 40.9 (25.8, 63.3) 8 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.9)
Richardson County Rural No 40.8 (27.4, 60.5) 9 (2, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Otoe County Rural No 40.2 (29.8, 53.6) 10 (2, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.8)
Dakota County Urban No 39.7 (28.7, 53.6) 11 (2, 42) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Gage County Rural No 38.9 (29.6, 50.5) 12 (3, 41) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Butler County Rural No 37.7 (23.7, 58.1) 13 (2, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Hamilton County Rural No 37.3 (24.1, 56.1) 14 (2, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Pierce County Rural No 36.9 (22.4, 58.5) 15 (2, 45) 4
*
*
Cuming County Rural No 36.0 (22.8, 55.1) 16 (2, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.4)
Cass County Urban No 35.7 (27.5, 46.0) 17 (4, 43) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 34.7 (27.9, 42.8) 18 (5, 42) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 34.6 (21.0, 54.5) 19 (2, 45) 4
*
*
Adams County Rural No 34.2 (26.6, 43.4) 20 (5, 43) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Dawes County Rural No 33.0 (20.2, 52.6) 21 (3, 45) 4
*
*
Madison County Rural No 33.0 (25.8, 41.6) 22 (6, 44) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Keith County Rural No 32.9 (21.8, 50.0) 23 (3, 45) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Douglas County Urban No 32.9 (30.9, 35.0) 24 (14, 35) 203 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.8, -3.9)
Cedar County Rural No 32.9 (19.2, 53.4) 25 (2, 45) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.9)
Knox County Rural No 32.0 (20.0, 50.3) 26 (3, 45) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
Phelps County Rural No 31.9 (20.3, 49.2) 27 (3, 45) 5
*
*
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 31.7 (25.1, 39.6) 28 (8, 44) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Washington County Urban No 31.4 (22.8, 42.6) 29 (5, 45) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Burt County Rural No 31.1 (18.8, 51.0) 30 (3, 45) 4 falling falling trend -14.1 (-38.3, -1.6)
Sarpy County Urban No 31.0 (27.4, 34.9) 31 (15, 42) 56 falling falling trend -6.7 (-14.7, -2.9)
Seward County Urban No 30.8 (21.4, 43.2) 32 (5, 45) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Saunders County Urban No 30.5 (22.6, 40.8) 33 (7, 45) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Red Willow County Rural No 30.4 (19.1, 46.7) 34 (3, 45) 5 falling falling trend -23.5 (-39.0, -1.6)
Lancaster County Urban No 29.7 (27.2, 32.4) 35 (19, 41) 104 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -2.2)
Hall County Urban No 29.5 (24.2, 35.8) 36 (12, 44) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Holt County Rural No 29.3 (18.9, 44.8) 37 (5, 45) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
York County Rural No 29.1 (19.6, 42.1) 38 (6, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 4.7)
Buffalo County Rural No 29.0 (23.1, 36.0) 39 (13, 45) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Box Butte County Rural No 28.8 (17.9, 44.8) 40 (4, 45) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.8)
Colfax County Rural No 27.5 (15.8, 44.8) 41 (4, 45) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.6)
Platte County Rural No 27.4 (21.1, 35.2) 42 (14, 45) 13 falling falling trend -4.4 (-9.8, -2.2)
Saline County Rural No 26.8 (17.0, 40.5) 43 (7, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Dawson County Rural No 25.6 (18.3, 35.1) 44 (13, 45) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Merrick County Urban Yes 23.9 (13.6, 40.9) 45 (8, 45) 3 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.1)
Antelope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Furnas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thayer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top