Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Jersey by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey *** 4.9 (4.7, 5.1) N/A 548 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -1.5)
United States *** 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) N/A 20,291 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Bergen County *** 4.7 (4.2, 5.2) 16 (6, 19) 61 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.5, -2.9)
Middlesex County *** 5.3 (4.6, 6.0) 9 (2, 17) 51 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Ocean County *** 5.0 (4.4, 5.7) 12 (3, 19) 51 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Monmouth County *** 5.3 (4.7, 6.1) 7 (2, 17) 46 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Essex County *** 4.6 (4.0, 5.3) 17 (5, 20) 40 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1)
Burlington County *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.6) 3 (1, 16) 33 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Camden County *** 5.2 (4.4, 6.0) 10 (2, 19) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.9)
Union County *** 4.4 (3.7, 5.2) 18 (7, 20) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Passaic County *** 4.7 (4.0, 5.6) 15 (3, 20) 26 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Morris County *** 3.9 (3.2, 4.7) 20 (12, 21) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -2.3)
Mercer County *** 4.8 (3.9, 5.8) 13 (3, 20) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.5)
Somerset County *** 5.3 (4.3, 6.4) 8 (1, 19) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Hudson County *** 3.2 (2.6, 3.9) 21 (18, 21) 21 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.9, -3.1)
Atlantic County *** 5.5 (4.5, 6.8) 5 (1, 19) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Gloucester County *** 5.4 (4.4, 6.6) 6 (1, 19) 19 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.8, -2.6)
Warren County *** 6.9 (5.2, 9.2) 1 (1, 16) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Cumberland County *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.0) 2 (1, 20) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Sussex County *** 5.2 (3.7, 7.0) 11 (1, 21) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Cape May County *** 4.8 (3.4, 6.7) 14 (1, 21) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Hunterdon County *** 4.1 (2.9, 5.8) 19 (3, 21) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Salem County *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.6) 4 (1, 21) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 2:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top