Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico No 135.1 (133.1, 137.1) N/A 3,623 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Guadalupe County No 176.4 (132.6, 232.0) 1 (1, 29) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Sierra County No 167.0 (143.4, 195.1) 2 (1, 21) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Quay County No 166.5 (136.5, 202.3) 3 (1, 26) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Luna County No 165.8 (146.4, 187.2) 4 (1, 17) 58 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Torrance County No 164.5 (140.6, 191.9) 5 (1, 22) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Lea County No 159.2 (145.4, 173.8) 6 (1, 17) 102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Eddy County No 154.9 (141.6, 169.3) 7 (2, 18) 102 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Otero County No 154.5 (142.8, 166.9) 8 (2, 18) 134 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Union County No 152.7 (111.1, 206.9) 9 (1, 32) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Hidalgo County No 151.7 (112.9, 202.2) 10 (1, 32) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Curry County No 149.1 (134.0, 165.4) 11 (2, 24) 73 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
De Baca County No 147.9 (97.6, 228.0) 12 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Grant County No 146.2 (130.4, 163.7) 13 (2, 26) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
McKinley County No 145.4 (132.7, 159.0) 14 (4, 24) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Chaves County No 144.0 (132.1, 156.6) 15 (5, 25) 112 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Roosevelt County No 142.5 (120.0, 168.1) 16 (2, 30) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Valencia County No 139.2 (128.9, 150.2) 17 (7, 26) 140 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Bernalillo County No 135.1 (131.5, 138.7) 18 (13, 24) 1,123 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
San Juan County No 134.5 (125.9, 143.5) 19 (11, 27) 190 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Socorro County No 133.4 (112.8, 157.1) 20 (4, 31) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
San Miguel County No 132.9 (117.4, 150.3) 21 (7, 30) 57 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Sandoval County No 131.4 (123.9, 139.2) 22 (13, 28) 246 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Dona Ana County No 130.4 (124.0, 137.0) 23 (14, 28) 327 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Colfax County No 126.9 (105.8, 152.0) 24 (5, 32) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Cibola County No 126.8 (109.9, 145.7) 25 (8, 32) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Rio Arriba County Yes 121.8 (108.9, 136.0) 26 (14, 32) 68 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Mora County Yes 121.3 (85.0, 170.3) 27 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Taos County Yes 119.3 (106.2, 133.9) 28 (16, 32) 70 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Lincoln County Yes 114.6 (99.1, 132.5) 29 (16, 32) 45 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Santa Fe County Yes 114.3 (108.0, 120.9) 30 (24, 32) 276 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Los Alamos County Yes 114.0 (96.4, 134.2) 31 (14, 32) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Catron County Yes 92.3 (66.7, 137.5) 32 (16, 32) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Harding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 3:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top