Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico N/A No 133.0 (131.1, 135.0) N/A 3,680 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Bernalillo County Urban No 131.6 (128.1, 135.2) 19 (13, 25) 1,116 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Dona Ana County Urban No 135.7 (129.3, 142.4) 17 (9, 25) 348 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Santa Fe County Urban Yes 114.2 (108.2, 120.5) 29 (23, 32) 301 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Sandoval County Urban No 130.8 (123.5, 138.4) 22 (12, 27) 257 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
San Juan County Urban No 131.6 (123.1, 140.5) 20 (10, 27) 187 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Valencia County Urban No 140.7 (130.3, 151.7) 14 (5, 25) 143 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Otero County Rural No 158.6 (146.6, 171.3) 6 (1, 14) 136 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.0)
Lea County Rural No 161.4 (147.6, 176.0) 4 (1, 14) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Chaves County Rural No 131.9 (120.5, 144.1) 18 (8, 28) 103 falling falling trend -2.1 (-9.5, -1.3)
Eddy County Rural No 150.4 (137.4, 164.3) 8 (2, 20) 102 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.2, -0.9)
McKinley County Rural No 143.0 (130.4, 156.5) 12 (4, 25) 99 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Grant County Rural No 142.2 (127.1, 158.9) 13 (3, 26) 76 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Curry County Rural No 153.9 (138.5, 170.5) 7 (1, 20) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Taos County Rural Yes 117.3 (104.8, 131.2) 28 (15, 32) 75 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Rio Arriba County Rural No 123.5 (110.9, 137.4) 25 (11, 31) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.3, -1.0)
San Miguel County Rural No 131.3 (115.8, 148.7) 21 (6, 30) 57 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Luna County Rural No 145.0 (127.6, 164.3) 11 (2, 27) 54 falling falling trend -5.7 (-13.0, -0.8)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 110.6 (96.1, 127.3) 30 (19, 32) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Sierra County Rural No 160.8 (138.0, 187.8) 5 (1, 22) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Cibola County Rural No 126.7 (110.1, 145.3) 24 (7, 32) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Torrance County Urban No 146.4 (124.9, 171.2) 10 (1, 28) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Socorro County Rural No 130.3 (109.7, 154.0) 23 (4, 32) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Roosevelt County Rural No 138.4 (116.6, 163.3) 15 (2, 31) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Colfax County Rural Yes 122.1 (102.2, 145.9) 26 (7, 32) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Los Alamos County Rural Yes 105.9 (88.9, 125.6) 31 (18, 32) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Quay County Rural No 166.8 (137.6, 201.5) 2 (1, 23) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Hidalgo County Rural No 147.2 (109.7, 196.5) 9 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Union County Rural No 171.6 (126.2, 229.9) 1 (1, 31) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Catron County Rural Yes 100.3 (73.8, 147.1) 32 (9, 32) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.1)
Mora County Rural Yes 120.7 (86.9, 167.2) 27 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Guadalupe County Rural No 137.2 (100.5, 185.4) 16 (1, 32) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.6)
De Baca County Rural No 162.6 (108.0, 247.9) 3 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top