Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico N/A No 765.3 (752.4, 778.3) N/A 2,757 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Sierra County Rural No 950.0 (821.8, 1,092.5) 1 (1, 18) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Otero County Rural No 944.4 (864.8, 1,029.4) 2 (1, 11) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Quay County Rural No 901.2 (729.8, 1,100.7) 3 (1, 29) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
De Baca County Rural No 890.5 (557.0, 1,352.1) 4 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Hidalgo County Rural No 876.8 (625.4, 1,196.1) 5 (1, 32) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Curry County Rural No 875.6 (773.7, 987.1) 6 (1, 23) 54 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lea County Rural No 873.7 (781.4, 973.9) 7 (1, 21) 67 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Torrance County Urban No 864.1 (721.6, 1,026.4) 8 (1, 29) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Union County Rural No 836.8 (583.6, 1,161.2) 9 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Luna County Rural No 835.7 (727.0, 956.1) 10 (1, 27) 43 falling falling trend -6.1 (-14.2, -1.5)
Eddy County Rural No 833.4 (747.7, 926.1) 11 (2, 25) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.3, -0.8)
Grant County Rural No 825.7 (736.9, 922.3) 12 (2, 26) 64 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
McKinley County Rural No 817.4 (731.8, 910.2) 13 (2, 26) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Valencia County Urban No 807.3 (738.5, 880.7) 14 (4, 25) 104 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.7, -1.2)
Roosevelt County Rural No 805.3 (661.8, 970.8) 15 (1, 31) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Sandoval County Urban No 779.5 (730.4, 831.0) 16 (7, 25) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.7)
Guadalupe County Rural No 774.8 (535.7, 1,084.3) 17 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Bernalillo County Urban No 771.0 (747.6, 795.0) 18 (11, 24) 835 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -1.1)
Dona Ana County Urban No 761.7 (720.6, 804.6) 19 (10, 26) 260 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
San Juan County Urban No 757.2 (700.5, 817.3) 20 (9, 28) 135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.3, -1.1)
Colfax County Rural No 738.6 (611.2, 884.7) 21 (3, 32) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Socorro County Rural No 733.8 (602.5, 884.9) 22 (3, 32) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Chaves County Rural No 727.2 (653.6, 806.7) 23 (9, 31) 73 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 1.4)
San Miguel County Rural No 721.0 (625.2, 827.3) 24 (7, 32) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Rio Arriba County Rural No 705.5 (624.5, 794.2) 25 (10, 32) 56 falling falling trend -2.1 (-9.7, -0.6)
Los Alamos County Rural No 704.5 (582.6, 844.2) 26 (5, 32) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.3)
Cibola County Rural No 703.1 (596.0, 823.7) 27 (7, 32) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Lincoln County Rural No 676.0 (582.3, 780.3) 28 (12, 32) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Santa Fe County Urban No 659.3 (621.4, 699.0) 29 (22, 32) 237 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Mora County Rural No 641.4 (454.7, 879.7) 30 (3, 32) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.4)
Catron County Rural No 629.2 (451.9, 851.5) 31 (4, 32) 9
*
*
Taos County Rural No 623.6 (551.9, 701.9) 32 (21, 32) 57 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top