Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico N/A Yes 114.4 (111.9, 116.9) N/A 1,698 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -1.0)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Valencia County Urban No 124.0 (110.5, 138.8) 9 (3, 23) 65 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 189.3 (118.6, 291.2) 1 (1, 29) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Torrance County Urban No 136.8 (107.7, 172.7) 6 (1, 27) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 1.0)
Taos County Rural Yes 93.6 (78.5, 111.5) 27 (12, 31) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.6)
Socorro County Rural Yes 102.2 (76.2, 135.0) 26 (3, 31) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Sierra County Rural Yes 105.2 (82.6, 136.6) 22 (4, 31) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Santa Fe County Urban Yes 104.6 (96.7, 113.1) 23 (13, 29) 150 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Sandoval County Urban Yes 109.0 (100.1, 118.5) 19 (10, 28) 116 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.6)
San Miguel County Rural Yes 119.9 (99.5, 143.9) 12 (3, 29) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
San Juan County Urban Yes 111.5 (101.0, 122.9) 18 (8, 27) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Roosevelt County Rural Yes 122.0 (94.4, 155.5) 10 (1, 30) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Rio Arriba County Rural Yes 103.4 (87.3, 121.9) 24 (8, 31) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Quay County Rural No 150.4 (112.0, 200.5) 2 (1, 27) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Otero County Rural No 142.6 (126.9, 159.7) 4 (1, 12) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Mora County Rural Yes 89.7 (50.5, 157.3) 29 (2, 31) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
McKinley County Rural Yes 107.8 (93.7, 123.5) 21 (8, 30) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Luna County Rural No 130.7 (107.3, 158.1) 8 (1, 27) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Los Alamos County Rural Yes 85.9 (65.2, 112.1) 31 (11, 31) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 89.3 (71.7, 111.7) 30 (13, 31) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lea County Rural No 143.8 (126.1, 163.3) 3 (1, 14) 49 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Hidalgo County Rural Yes 119.9 (75.0, 189.9) 11 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Guadalupe County Rural No 131.0 (79.6, 210.4) 7 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Grant County Rural Yes 112.0 (93.9, 133.7) 17 (4, 30) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Eddy County Rural Yes 118.2 (102.3, 135.9) 14 (4, 27) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.8, -0.8)
Dona Ana County Urban Yes 118.2 (110.0, 126.9) 13 (6, 23) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Curry County Rural No 138.5 (118.7, 160.6) 5 (1, 19) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Colfax County Rural Yes 102.7 (77.8, 135.9) 25 (4, 31) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Cibola County Rural Yes 113.2 (92.1, 138.1) 16 (3, 30) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Chaves County Rural Yes 108.8 (94.8, 124.4) 20 (7, 29) 45 falling falling trend -2.5 (-12.3, -1.2)
Catron County Rural Yes 92.0 (57.4, 180.0) 28 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Bernalillo County Urban Yes 113.9 (109.5, 118.5) 15 (9, 23) 532 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
De Baca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 7:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top