Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico N/A No 19.3 (18.2, 20.4) N/A 279 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Bernalillo County Urban No 19.3 (17.5, 21.2) 10 (5, 15) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Dona Ana County Urban No 23.6 (19.9, 27.8) 5 (1, 11) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
San Juan County Urban Yes 14.9 (11.2, 19.4) 18 (8, 19) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Sandoval County Urban No 17.0 (13.6, 21.1) 15 (6, 19) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.2)
Santa Fe County Urban No 19.0 (15.6, 22.9) 11 (4, 17) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.0)
Torrance County Urban No 25.6 (14.3, 44.4) 3 (1, 19) 3
*
*
Valencia County Urban No 17.5 (12.6, 23.8) 14 (4, 19) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.6)
Chaves County Rural No 17.6 (12.2, 24.7) 13 (3, 19) 7 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.1)
Cibola County Rural No 22.1 (13.4, 34.9) 6 (1, 19) 4
*
*
Curry County Rural No 20.8 (13.3, 30.9) 7 (1, 19) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Eddy County Rural No 19.9 (13.5, 28.3) 8 (1, 19) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Grant County Rural No 15.5 (9.2, 25.8) 17 (3, 19) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.9)
Lea County Rural No 28.1 (20.5, 37.5) 1 (1, 12) 9
*
*
Luna County Rural No 28.1 (17.2, 43.5) 2 (1, 17) 5
*
*
McKinley County Rural No 18.0 (12.3, 25.2) 12 (3, 19) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Otero County Rural No 24.0 (17.5, 32.3) 4 (1, 16) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
Rio Arriba County Rural Yes 12.0 (6.9, 20.0) 19 (8, 19) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 2.3)
San Miguel County Rural No 16.7 (10.3, 27.0) 16 (3, 19) 4
*
*
Taos County Rural No 19.5 (12.9, 29.3) 9 (1, 19) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.9)
Catron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colfax County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Baca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guadalupe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Los Alamos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mora County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roosevelt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Socorro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 9:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top