Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | Yes | 43.2 (42.8, 43.6) | N/A | 9,307 |
falling 
|
-2.2 (-2.2, -2.1) |
| United States | Yes | 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) | N/A | 168,038 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Hamilton County | Yes | 51.4 (26.5, 98.3) | 23 (1, 62) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-4.3, -0.1) |
| Lewis County | Yes | 39.2 (29.6, 51.3) | 56 (9, 62) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.3, -0.7) |
| Schuyler County | Yes | 62.5 (47.2, 81.8) | 1 (1, 56) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.3) |
| Yates County | Yes | 48.0 (36.7, 62.1) | 40 (1, 62) | 14 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.1, -0.9) |
| Schoharie County | Yes | 50.4 (40.0, 63.1) | 28 (1, 62) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.5, -1.1) |
| Seneca County | Yes | 48.3 (38.6, 59.9) | 38 (2, 62) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.4) |
| Essex County | Yes | 50.5 (41.1, 61.6) | 27 (1, 58) | 25 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.1, -1.3) |
| Wyoming County | Yes | 48.6 (40.2, 58.6) | 37 (2, 59) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -0.9) |
| Delaware County | Yes | 47.5 (39.0, 57.7) | 41 (3, 60) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Cortland County | Yes | 52.2 (43.2, 62.6) | 19 (1, 57) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| Tioga County | Yes | 44.0 (36.3, 53.1) | 49 (7, 62) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.6, -1.3) |
| Orleans County | Yes | 56.2 (46.6, 67.3) | 8 (1, 53) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Allegany County | Yes | 54.2 (45.0, 65.0) | 14 (1, 54) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.6, -1.1) |
| Franklin County | Yes | 51.2 (43.0, 60.7) | 25 (1, 56) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.6, -1.2) |
| Chenango County | Yes | 54.6 (45.8, 64.8) | 13 (1, 53) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.9) |
| Otsego County | Yes | 50.2 (42.0, 59.7) | 30 (2, 58) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Montgomery County | Yes | 58.3 (49.2, 68.6) | 4 (1, 46) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.5) |
| Madison County | Yes | 42.0 (35.6, 49.4) | 52 (19, 62) | 36 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.6, -1.4) |
| Greene County | Yes | 62.1 (52.9, 72.7) | 2 (1, 35) | 37 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Herkimer County | Yes | 49.8 (42.5, 58.3) | 33 (3, 57) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.4, -1.1) |
| Fulton County | Yes | 58.1 (49.7, 67.8) | 5 (1, 45) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Columbia County | Yes | 48.1 (41.0, 56.4) | 39 (4, 58) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Livingston County | Yes | 50.3 (42.9, 58.8) | 29 (2, 55) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.1) |
| Genesee County | Yes | 56.6 (48.6, 65.7) | 6 (1, 45) | 41 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Tompkins County | Yes | 43.1 (37.2, 49.8) | 50 (17, 61) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.9) |
| Warren County | Yes | 53.7 (46.2, 62.3) | 15 (1, 51) | 43 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Sullivan County | Yes | 49.3 (42.7, 56.7) | 34 (4, 55) | 45 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.2, -2.3) |
| Washington County | Yes | 60.1 (52.1, 69.1) | 3 (1, 39) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.6) |
| Putnam County | Yes | 36.9 (32.1, 42.3) | 58 (45, 62) | 47 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.4, -2.2) |
| Cayuga County | Yes | 51.3 (44.8, 58.5) | 24 (2, 53) | 51 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Clinton County | Yes | 51.6 (45.2, 58.9) | 21 (2, 52) | 51 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.0) |
| Jefferson County | Yes | 51.7 (45.5, 58.5) | 20 (2, 51) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Cattaraugus County | Yes | 56.4 (49.4, 64.1) | 7 (1, 44) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Chemung County | Yes | 55.2 (48.6, 62.6) | 12 (1, 46) | 56 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
| Wayne County | Yes | 53.1 (46.9, 60.0) | 17 (2, 49) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.9) |
| Steuben County | Yes | 53.7 (47.5, 60.6) | 16 (2, 48) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -1.0) |
| Ontario County | Yes | 45.6 (40.4, 51.3) | 45 (13, 58) | 64 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.5) |
| St. Lawrence County | Yes | 55.5 (49.5, 62.1) | 10 (1, 40) | 69 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Chautauqua County | Yes | 50.5 (45.1, 56.4) | 26 (5, 51) | 75 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Oswego County | Yes | 55.6 (49.9, 61.8) | 9 (1, 40) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Schenectady County | Yes | 49.8 (45.1, 54.9) | 32 (8, 50) | 89 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.3) |
| Rensselaer County | Yes | 48.9 (44.3, 54.0) | 36 (8, 52) | 90 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.3, -1.5) |
| Ulster County | Yes | 44.5 (40.4, 48.9) | 48 (23, 57) | 99 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.7, -1.8) |
| Broome County | Yes | 52.4 (47.9, 57.3) | 18 (4, 44) | 114 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Rockland County | Yes | 35.5 (32.6, 38.7) | 59 (53, 62) | 115 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-3.3, -2.7) |
| Saratoga County | Yes | 42.3 (38.8, 46.0) | 51 (34, 58) | 119 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.4, -1.7) |
| Oneida County | Yes | 51.5 (47.5, 55.9) | 22 (6, 44) | 134 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -1.0) |
| Niagara County | Yes | 55.5 (51.2, 60.0) | 11 (1, 34) | 145 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
| Dutchess County | Yes | 41.4 (38.3, 44.7) | 54 (39, 58) | 150 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Albany County | Yes | 47.2 (43.8, 50.8) | 42 (18, 51) | 159 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.2, -1.7) |
| Orange County | Yes | 46.5 (43.5, 49.6) | 43 (22, 52) | 191 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Richmond County | Yes | 41.9 (39.4, 44.5) | 53 (40, 57) | 227 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.0, -2.6) |
| Onondaga County | Yes | 45.7 (43.0, 48.6) | 44 (26, 53) | 238 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.6) |
| Westchester County | Yes | 33.6 (32.1, 35.3) | 62 (57, 62) | 372 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-3.1, -2.7) |
| Monroe County | Yes | 45.4 (43.3, 47.7) | 46 (30, 52) | 377 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.0, -1.6) |
| Erie County | Yes | 49.1 (47.2, 51.2) | 35 (18, 43) | 532 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
| Nassau County | Yes | 35.1 (33.8, 36.5) | 61 (56, 62) | 553 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.0, -2.7) |
| New York County | Yes | 35.2 (33.8, 36.5) | 60 (56, 62) | 565 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-3.2, -2.9) |
| Bronx County | Yes | 49.9 (48.3, 51.7) | 31 (17, 39) | 699 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.4, -2.1) |
| Suffolk County | Yes | 39.4 (38.1, 40.8) | 55 (49, 58) | 701 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.0, -2.7) |
| Queens County | Yes | 39.0 (37.9, 40.2) | 57 (50, 59) | 970 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.0, -1.2) |
| Kings County | Yes | 45.0 (43.8, 46.2) | 47 (36, 51) | 1,115 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-4.1, -2.4) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 8:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 8:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.