Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
New York N/A No 426.9 (424.8, 429.0) N/A 31,648 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.0, -2.6)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Schuyler County Rural No 615.5 (540.3, 698.2) 1 (1, 35) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Orleans County Urban No 601.8 (547.9, 659.5) 2 (1, 24) 95 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Clinton County Rural No 568.6 (531.2, 607.8) 7 (1, 28) 177 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Cayuga County Rural No 497.5 (463.5, 533.4) 35 (10, 52) 164 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Chautauqua County Rural No 516.3 (489.5, 544.1) 25 (9, 45) 288 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Chemung County Urban No 600.3 (564.0, 638.4) 3 (1, 17) 210 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Cortland County Rural No 536.0 (487.0, 588.6) 16 (2, 49) 90 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Steuben County Rural No 587.4 (553.8, 622.6) 4 (1, 19) 233 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Wyoming County Rural No 518.2 (469.0, 571.2) 23 (2, 54) 84 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 547.5 (502.0, 596.0) 12 (1, 42) 111 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Oneida County Urban No 520.9 (500.4, 542.1) 22 (11, 39) 497 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Otsego County Rural No 501.2 (462.8, 541.9) 33 (8, 53) 130 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Franklin County Rural No 572.7 (524.7, 624.0) 6 (1, 34) 108 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Fulton County Rural No 544.7 (502.0, 590.0) 13 (1, 42) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Genesee County Rural No 524.8 (484.9, 567.1) 20 (4, 49) 131 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 553.0 (518.7, 588.9) 10 (1, 33) 198 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Niagara County Urban No 544.0 (522.3, 566.5) 14 (5, 28) 486 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -1.0)
Oswego County Urban No 552.3 (520.8, 585.2) 11 (2, 32) 240 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.8)
Schoharie County Urban No 562.4 (507.5, 621.7) 8 (1, 44) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Seneca County Rural No 504.2 (452.3, 560.5) 31 (4, 55) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Wayne County Urban No 509.4 (477.3, 543.0) 29 (9, 50) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Broome County Urban No 496.1 (474.8, 518.2) 36 (17, 49) 423 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Chenango County Rural No 530.5 (486.7, 577.1) 18 (2, 50) 111 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Delaware County Rural No 507.4 (466.9, 550.4) 30 (6, 53) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Greene County Rural No 581.7 (537.8, 628.3) 5 (1, 25) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Washington County Urban No 556.0 (516.4, 597.9) 9 (1, 36) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Yates County Rural No 533.9 (472.4, 601.2) 17 (1, 53) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Herkimer County Urban No 474.6 (437.9, 513.4) 48 (16, 55) 128 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Albany County Urban No 477.9 (460.2, 496.1) 43 (29, 52) 569 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.0, -1.0)
Columbia County Rural No 481.0 (446.5, 517.4) 41 (15, 55) 149 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Hamilton County Rural No 477.2 (375.5, 599.2) 45 (1, 62) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 516.6 (481.5, 553.5) 24 (6, 50) 167 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Essex County Rural No 498.7 (454.8, 545.9) 34 (7, 54) 97 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Ontario County Urban No 476.2 (449.0, 504.6) 46 (23, 54) 235 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Schenectady County Urban No 487.7 (462.8, 513.6) 38 (20, 52) 297 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.7, -1.3)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 543.6 (512.2, 576.4) 15 (3, 37) 229 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Warren County Urban No 501.6 (466.4, 538.7) 32 (9, 52) 155 falling falling trend -1.6 (-6.7, -1.0)
Allegany County Rural No 529.3 (483.6, 578.2) 19 (2, 51) 102 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Sullivan County Rural No 510.0 (474.5, 547.5) 28 (7, 51) 158 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Tompkins County Urban No 417.6 (386.6, 450.4) 55 (47, 59) 139 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Ulster County Urban No 467.1 (445.8, 489.3) 50 (31, 54) 370 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Lewis County Rural No 480.9 (423.5, 543.8) 42 (6, 57) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Madison County Urban No 495.3 (458.3, 534.5) 37 (11, 54) 136 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.8, -1.4)
Monroe County Urban No 481.6 (470.2, 493.1) 40 (30, 50) 1,400 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.5)
Rensselaer County Urban No 523.7 (497.9, 550.5) 21 (8, 40) 319 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.5)
Richmond County Urban No 456.4 (442.2, 471.0) 52 (41, 54) 806 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Tioga County Urban No 477.7 (437.2, 520.9) 44 (13, 55) 105 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Orange County Urban No 475.5 (458.3, 493.2) 47 (30, 52) 595 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -1.7)
Dutchess County Urban No 461.2 (444.0, 479.0) 51 (37, 54) 553 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.8)
Livingston County Urban No 511.3 (472.0, 553.1) 26 (6, 52) 129 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.5)
Nassau County Urban No 399.7 (392.2, 407.3) 57 (54, 58) 2,220 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -2.0)
Putnam County Urban No 438.6 (409.1, 469.6) 54 (36, 57) 169 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
Rockland County Urban No 377.0 (361.3, 393.3) 58 (56, 60) 440 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.2)
Saratoga County Urban No 484.0 (464.1, 504.6) 39 (22, 52) 455 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.1, -1.5)
Erie County Urban No 510.9 (500.6, 521.3) 27 (18, 37) 1,932 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.9)
Suffolk County Urban No 441.8 (434.1, 449.6) 53 (49, 55) 2,572 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -2.2)
Onondaga County Urban No 469.3 (455.1, 483.8) 49 (35, 53) 857 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.3)
New York County Urban No 348.6 (342.0, 355.3) 61 (60, 62) 2,144 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.1, -3.2)
Westchester County Urban No 372.3 (363.7, 381.1) 59 (57, 60) 1,459 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.2, -2.9)
Queens County Urban No 340.5 (334.9, 346.1) 62 (61, 62) 2,920 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.3, -3.4)
Kings County Urban No 361.2 (355.5, 367.1) 60 (58, 61) 3,062 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.7, -3.6)
Bronx County Urban No 403.6 (395.1, 412.2) 56 (54, 58) 1,757 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.1, -3.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 12:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top