Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York Yes 121.7 (120.9, 122.6) N/A 17,149 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
New York County Yes 103.4 (100.8, 106.1) 62 (59, 62) 1,236 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.6, -2.2)
Queens County Yes 103.6 (101.4, 105.9) 61 (58, 62) 1,661 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Westchester County Yes 107.2 (103.8, 110.7) 60 (56, 62) 814 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.2)
Rockland County Yes 109.3 (103.1, 115.8) 59 (52, 62) 244 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Kings County Yes 112.7 (110.3, 115.0) 58 (53, 59) 1,849 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Nassau County Yes 112.7 (109.8, 115.7) 57 (53, 60) 1,217 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Bronx County Yes 116.6 (113.4, 119.9) 56 (50, 58) 1,029 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -1.7)
Tioga County Yes 119.8 (104.7, 136.9) 55 (19, 62) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Madison County Yes 119.9 (106.6, 134.6) 54 (22, 62) 63 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.6)
Herkimer County Yes 120.0 (106.5, 135.1) 53 (20, 62) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Tompkins County Yes 122.3 (109.9, 135.9) 52 (20, 62) 74 stable stable trend -8.5 (-17.0, 0.9)
Suffolk County No 124.7 (121.6, 127.7) 51 (42, 55) 1,368 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Putnam County No 126.1 (114.4, 138.8) 50 (17, 59) 90 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Dutchess County No 126.7 (120.0, 133.8) 49 (29, 55) 279 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Saratoga County No 128.5 (120.9, 136.5) 48 (24, 55) 222 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Columbia County No 128.7 (114.9, 144.2) 47 (10, 59) 69 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Ontario County No 128.8 (118.4, 140.1) 46 (16, 57) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Onondaga County No 131.5 (125.9, 137.3) 45 (24, 52) 447 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Richmond County No 131.6 (126.0, 137.3) 44 (24, 52) 446 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
Schoharie County No 131.7 (111.5, 155.2) 43 (3, 62) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Delaware County No 132.7 (116.8, 150.8) 42 (5, 59) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Ulster County No 133.2 (124.6, 142.4) 41 (14, 54) 190 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Albany County No 133.3 (126.4, 140.5) 40 (18, 52) 303 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Genesee County No 133.6 (118.3, 150.6) 39 (5, 58) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Monroe County No 133.9 (129.5, 138.5) 38 (23, 49) 739 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Broome County No 134.8 (126.2, 143.9) 37 (12, 52) 205 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Warren County No 136.7 (122.9, 151.9) 36 (4, 56) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
St. Lawrence County No 137.8 (126.1, 150.5) 35 (6, 54) 107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Orange County No 138.0 (131.2, 145.1) 34 (12, 48) 321 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Livingston County No 138.5 (123.1, 155.6) 33 (3, 56) 64 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Rensselaer County No 138.6 (128.9, 149.0) 32 (7, 51) 159 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Cortland County No 138.8 (120.8, 159.0) 31 (2, 58) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Otsego County No 139.5 (124.0, 156.7) 30 (3, 55) 68 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Schenectady County No 139.5 (129.8, 149.9) 29 (7, 50) 165 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Cattaraugus County No 140.2 (126.5, 155.2) 28 (3, 53) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Oneida County No 140.4 (132.4, 148.9) 27 (8, 47) 252 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Lewis County No 142.3 (118.5, 170.0) 26 (1, 61) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Wyoming County No 142.5 (122.7, 165.1) 25 (1, 58) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Chautauqua County No 142.6 (132.1, 153.8) 24 (4, 48) 150 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Greene County No 142.9 (125.8, 162.1) 23 (1, 55) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Cayuga County No 142.9 (129.3, 157.9) 22 (2, 54) 86 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Erie County No 143.1 (139.1, 147.2) 21 (11, 34) 1,037 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Niagara County No 143.2 (134.9, 152.0) 20 (6, 44) 240 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Yates County No 145.0 (121.2, 172.8) 19 (1, 60) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Essex County No 145.2 (126.0, 167.0) 18 (1, 55) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Clinton County No 145.2 (131.1, 160.6) 17 (2, 51) 82 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Seneca County No 145.8 (124.8, 169.8) 16 (1, 57) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Steuben County No 146.0 (133.5, 159.5) 15 (2, 48) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Oswego County No 146.6 (134.6, 159.5) 14 (2, 46) 115 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Fulton County No 146.7 (130.1, 165.1) 13 (1, 52) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wayne County No 149.7 (136.6, 163.8) 12 (1, 43) 103 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Chenango County No 149.7 (132.1, 169.3) 11 (1, 51) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Montgomery County No 150.1 (132.4, 169.7) 10 (1, 51) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Franklin County No 151.2 (132.9, 171.8) 9 (1, 50) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Allegany County No 151.4 (132.8, 172.2) 8 (1, 51) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Sullivan County No 152.5 (137.6, 168.7) 7 (1, 45) 82 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Chemung County No 155.8 (142.2, 170.5) 6 (1, 37) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Hamilton County No 156.4 (102.2, 240.0) 5 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Jefferson County No 157.9 (144.0, 172.7) 4 (1, 35) 101 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Orleans County No 161.4 (140.8, 184.4) 3 (1, 45) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Washington County No 165.6 (149.1, 183.8) 2 (1, 30) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Schuyler County No 176.1 (144.9, 213.0) 1 (1, 48) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top