Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
New York No 11.9 (11.7, 12.1) N/A 2,948 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.2, -2.7)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Lewis County No 18.4 (12.4, 26.6) 1 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 13.2 (10.4, 16.6) 21 (2, 59) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Nassau County No 10.8 (10.2, 11.5) 51 (35, 57) 205 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Allegany County No 16.9 (12.5, 22.5) 2 (1, 54) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Cattaraugus County No 13.4 (10.4, 17.1) 20 (2, 59) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Franklin County No 16.0 (11.8, 21.2) 4 (1, 56) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Fulton County No 14.9 (11.1, 19.8) 10 (1, 58) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Orleans County No 14.7 (10.4, 20.4) 12 (1, 60) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Steuben County No 15.3 (12.5, 18.7) 7 (1, 51) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Broome County No 12.4 (10.5, 14.6) 35 (7, 58) 34 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Warren County No 13.1 (10.0, 17.1) 22 (1, 61) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Cortland County No 13.7 (9.7, 18.8) 18 (1, 61) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Herkimer County No 15.3 (11.7, 19.7) 8 (1, 57) 13 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Wyoming County No 12.8 (8.7, 18.3) 26 (1, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Monroe County No 12.5 (11.5, 13.5) 33 (14, 48) 123 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Chautauqua County No 13.0 (10.7, 15.7) 25 (4, 57) 24 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Columbia County No 14.2 (10.8, 18.4) 13 (1, 58) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.9)
Genesee County No 12.4 (9.1, 16.6) 36 (2, 61) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.7)
Madison County No 13.1 (9.9, 17.2) 23 (1, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Onondaga County No 12.0 (10.7, 13.4) 41 (15, 55) 71 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.5)
Queens County No 11.5 (10.9, 12.1) 47 (30, 53) 324 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.1, -2.7)
Chemung County No 10.5 (7.9, 13.6) 53 (10, 61) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Erie County No 12.7 (11.8, 13.6) 30 (14, 46) 161 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.3, -2.7)
Greene County No 12.2 (8.7, 17.0) 39 (1, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -2.0)
Livingston County No 14.1 (10.6, 18.7) 14 (1, 60) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Otsego County No 13.4 (10.1, 17.7) 19 (1, 60) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Richmond County No 13.8 (12.4, 15.2) 16 (6, 41) 82 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.5)
Chenango County No 13.7 (9.8, 18.7) 17 (1, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Oswego County No 12.2 (9.8, 15.2) 38 (5, 60) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.2)
Washington County No 16.4 (12.8, 20.9) 3 (1, 50) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Wayne County No 12.7 (10.0, 16.0) 28 (3, 60) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -2.0)
Delaware County No 11.8 (8.6, 16.2) 45 (3, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.1)
Essex County No 15.5 (11.2, 21.3) 5 (1, 59) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.6)
Niagara County No 11.9 (10.1, 13.9) 44 (10, 59) 35 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Schoharie County No 11.9 (7.7, 17.9) 42 (1, 61) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Sullivan County No 14.8 (11.6, 18.6) 11 (1, 55) 15 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Clinton County No 14.0 (10.9, 17.8) 15 (1, 58) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Kings County No 12.7 (12.1, 13.3) 29 (16, 42) 358 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.8)
Oneida County No 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 46 (13, 59) 39 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.8, -2.8)
Orange County No 12.7 (11.2, 14.4) 27 (7, 52) 53 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.7)
Putnam County No 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) 57 (15, 61) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Saratoga County No 13.1 (11.3, 15.0) 24 (6, 54) 41 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.0, -2.6)
Albany County No 10.5 (9.1, 12.1) 52 (25, 60) 42 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Rensselaer County No 10.4 (8.5, 12.8) 54 (15, 61) 21 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
St. Lawrence County No 15.5 (12.7, 18.9) 6 (1, 48) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.3)
Ulster County No 12.6 (10.6, 14.8) 31 (6, 57) 32 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.7)
Cayuga County No 12.4 (9.7, 15.8) 34 (3, 60) 14 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.5, -2.5)
Schenectady County Yes 8.7 (7.0, 10.8) 60 (39, 61) 19 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.7)
Seneca County No 11.1 (7.1, 16.7) 49 (1, 61) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.9)
Westchester County No 10.2 (9.5, 11.0) 56 (40, 60) 138 falling falling trend -3.5 (-3.7, -3.3)
Rockland County No 11.0 (9.6, 12.6) 50 (20, 60) 44 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.3, -3.0)
Dutchess County No 10.4 (9.0, 11.9) 55 (27, 61) 42 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.2, -3.4)
Suffolk County No 12.0 (11.3, 12.8) 40 (20, 49) 235 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.0, -3.5)
Tioga County No 11.9 (8.6, 16.3) 43 (3, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.5)
Yates County No 10.2 (6.1, 16.4) 58 (3, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3)
New York County No 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 59 (47, 61) 201 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.4, -3.5)
Montgomery County No 11.1 (7.9, 15.4) 48 (4, 61) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.6)
Ontario County No 12.2 (9.9, 15.1) 37 (6, 60) 20 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.8, -3.1)
Tompkins County Yes 8.4 (6.1, 11.5) 61 (29, 61) 9 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.4, -3.2)
Bronx County No 12.5 (11.7, 13.3) 32 (16, 46) 185 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.4, -3.2)
Schuyler County No 15.0 (8.7, 24.5) 9 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2022 9:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top