Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York *** 5.7 (5.5, 5.8) N/A 1,437 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
United States *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.7) N/A 27,509 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Cattaraugus County *** 3.1 (1.7, 5.2) 54 (16, 54) 3
*
*
Wayne County *** 3.5 (2.2, 5.4) 53 (18, 54) 5
*
*
Steuben County *** 3.8 (2.5, 5.6) 52 (13, 54) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.2)
Otsego County *** 3.9 (2.1, 6.7) 51 (4, 54) 3
*
*
Jefferson County *** 3.9 (2.5, 5.9) 50 (8, 54) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Fulton County *** 4.2 (2.4, 7.0) 49 (3, 54) 3
*
*
Cayuga County *** 4.3 (2.8, 6.5) 48 (5, 54) 5
*
*
Putnam County *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.3) 47 (5, 54) 6
*
*
Nassau County *** 4.4 (4.0, 4.9) 46 (29, 51) 85 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.7)
Montgomery County *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.6) 45 (2, 54) 3
*
*
Saratoga County *** 4.5 (3.6, 5.8) 44 (11, 53) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
St. Lawrence County *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.4) 43 (5, 54) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Westchester County *** 4.7 (4.2, 5.2) 42 (23, 50) 62 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.6)
Chemung County *** 4.7 (3.2, 6.9) 41 (4, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.4)
Ontario County *** 4.8 (3.4, 6.7) 40 (4, 54) 8
*
*
Tioga County *** 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 39 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Rockland County *** 4.9 (4.0, 6.0) 38 (9, 52) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Dutchess County *** 4.9 (4.0, 6.0) 37 (10, 51) 21 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.3)
Sullivan County *** 5.0 (3.4, 7.3) 36 (2, 54) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Suffolk County *** 5.0 (4.6, 5.5) 35 (20, 44) 101 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.8, 1.7)
Genesee County *** 5.1 (3.1, 7.9) 34 (2, 54) 4
*
*
Columbia County *** 5.1 (3.4, 7.7) 33 (2, 54) 6 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.7)
Onondaga County *** 5.1 (4.3, 6.0) 32 (9, 49) 32 stable stable trend -5.6 (-12.9, 2.4)
Delaware County *** 5.2 (2.9, 8.7) 31 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Clinton County *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.7) 30 (2, 54) 6
*
*
Essex County *** 5.3 (2.9, 9.1) 29 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Tompkins County *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.7) 28 (2, 54) 6
*
*
Franklin County *** 5.4 (3.1, 8.7) 27 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Chautauqua County *** 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 26 (3, 52) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 3.0)
Oneida County *** 5.4 (4.3, 6.7) 25 (4, 50) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.4, 3.5)
Chenango County *** 5.4 (3.2, 8.8) 24 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Rensselaer County *** 5.6 (4.2, 7.3) 23 (2, 51) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
New York County *** 5.6 (5.2, 6.1) 22 (9, 36) 118 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.4)
Broome County *** 5.7 (4.4, 7.2) 21 (3, 49) 16 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.0, 3.1)
Erie County *** 5.7 (5.2, 6.4) 20 (7, 36) 75 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.4, 2.6)
Niagara County *** 5.8 (4.6, 7.2) 19 (3, 47) 18 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.5, 3.8)
Monroe County *** 5.8 (5.2, 6.6) 18 (5, 38) 57 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.6, 3.0)
Greene County *** 6.0 (3.9, 9.2) 17 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Kings County *** 6.0 (5.6, 6.4) 16 (6, 29) 172 falling falling trend -6.9 (-12.2, -1.2)
Schenectady County *** 6.1 (4.6, 7.8) 15 (2, 49) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.6, 4.7)
Washington County *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.2) 14 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Queens County *** 6.1 (5.7, 6.5) 13 (6, 28) 174 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 1.0)
Oswego County *** 6.1 (4.4, 8.3) 12 (1, 52) 9 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 4.9)
Wyoming County *** 6.3 (3.6, 10.4) 11 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Livingston County *** 6.4 (4.2, 9.4) 10 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Ulster County *** 6.4 (5.1, 8.0) 9 (2, 44) 17 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.4)
Warren County *** 6.4 (4.4, 9.3) 8 (1, 51) 7 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Albany County *** 6.4 (5.4, 7.7) 7 (2, 38) 26 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.4, 3.1)
Richmond County *** 6.5 (5.6, 7.4) 6 (2, 33) 40 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Orange County *** 6.5 (5.5, 7.7) 5 (2, 35) 29 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.8)
Orleans County *** 6.8 (4.0, 10.9) 4 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Seneca County *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.5) 3 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Cortland County *** 7.3 (4.5, 11.4) 2 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Bronx County *** 9.0 (8.3, 9.7) 1 (1, 4) 138 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Allegany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Herkimer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoharie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2022 11:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top