Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A Yes 15.6 (15.3, 15.9) N/A 1,657 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.1)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Yates County Rural No 25.3 (15.5, 39.7) 1 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Chenango County Rural No 25.0 (17.8, 34.6) 2 (1, 43) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Orleans County Urban No 23.5 (15.1, 34.9) 3 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Schoharie County Urban No 23.4 (15.4, 34.9) 4 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Lewis County Rural No 22.3 (13.3, 35.4) 5 (1, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -1.3)
Otsego County Rural No 21.3 (15.4, 29.1) 6 (1, 52) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
Franklin County Rural No 20.7 (13.7, 30.0) 7 (1, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Allegany County Rural No 20.6 (13.9, 29.7) 8 (1, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.5)
Bronx County Urban No 20.5 (18.9, 22.3) 9 (3, 21) 118 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.7, -2.7)
Genesee County Rural No 20.5 (14.5, 28.3) 10 (1, 55) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.4)
Broome County Urban No 20.2 (16.8, 24.1) 11 (2, 39) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Greene County Rural No 20.2 (14.2, 28.3) 12 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Saratoga County Urban No 19.9 (16.5, 23.7) 13 (2, 40) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 11.9)
Fulton County Rural No 18.6 (12.4, 27.0) 14 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.4)
Warren County Urban No 18.5 (13.2, 25.5) 15 (1, 57) 9
*
*
Schenectady County Urban No 18.5 (14.7, 23.1) 16 (2, 51) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Chemung County Urban No 18.2 (13.4, 24.3) 17 (2, 56) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.2)
Dutchess County Urban No 18.1 (15.4, 21.3) 18 (4, 44) 32 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.0)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 18.1 (13.5, 23.8) 19 (2, 55) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -2.1)
Steuben County Rural No 18.0 (13.5, 23.6) 20 (2, 55) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.3)
Monroe County Urban No 17.9 (16.1, 19.8) 21 (8, 37) 74 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
Livingston County Urban No 17.7 (12.2, 25.0) 22 (1, 58) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.4)
Madison County Urban No 17.1 (11.7, 24.3) 23 (2, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Essex County Rural No 17.1 (11.0, 26.1) 24 (1, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.8)
Clinton County Rural No 17.1 (12.1, 23.6) 25 (2, 59) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Albany County Urban Yes 16.9 (14.1, 20.0) 26 (7, 51) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -2.0)
Erie County Urban Yes 16.7 (15.1, 18.3) 27 (12, 42) 90 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.5)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 16.3 (11.8, 22.0) 28 (3, 59) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.4, -2.7)
Suffolk County Urban Yes 16.3 (15.0, 17.6) 29 (16, 43) 135 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 6.9)
Niagara County Urban Yes 16.1 (13.1, 19.7) 30 (7, 55) 20 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Ulster County Urban Yes 16.0 (12.8, 19.7) 31 (8, 56) 19 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.7, -3.3)
Wayne County Urban Yes 15.9 (11.5, 21.4) 32 (4, 59) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.8, -2.5)
Orange County Urban Yes 15.7 (13.1, 18.7) 33 (10, 54) 27 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.1)
Herkimer County Urban Yes 15.6 (10.6, 22.4) 34 (3, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.8)
Onondaga County Urban Yes 15.5 (13.4, 17.9) 35 (13, 53) 41 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Tompkins County Urban Yes 15.4 (10.8, 21.4) 36 (4, 59) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -3.0)
New York County Urban Yes 15.3 (14.1, 16.5) 37 (22, 48) 136 falling falling trend -4.8 (-11.0, -3.6)
Kings County Urban Yes 15.1 (14.1, 16.2) 38 (23, 47) 177 falling falling trend -7.2 (-12.1, -3.3)
Oneida County Urban Yes 15.1 (12.3, 18.3) 39 (12, 56) 22 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.6)
Richmond County Urban Yes 14.4 (12.3, 16.8) 40 (19, 56) 35 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -3.0)
Wyoming County Rural Yes 14.4 (8.1, 23.7) 41 (2, 59) 3 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.1)
Cattaraugus County Rural Yes 14.4 (9.9, 20.3) 42 (5, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.5)
Ontario County Urban Yes 14.3 (10.5, 19.2) 43 (8, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.9)
Chautauqua County Rural Yes 14.1 (10.7, 18.3) 44 (12, 59) 12 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.5, -3.5)
Rensselaer County Urban Yes 14.0 (10.5, 18.1) 45 (11, 59) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.1)
Seneca County Rural Yes 13.9 (7.8, 23.2) 46 (2, 59) 3 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.7)
Nassau County Urban Yes 13.7 (12.6, 14.9) 47 (31, 54) 111 stable stable trend 3.8 (-3.2, 8.3)
Cayuga County Rural Yes 13.3 (9.1, 19.0) 48 (7, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.7)
Westchester County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.0, 14.8) 49 (31, 56) 75 falling falling trend -3.6 (-8.3, -3.2)
Sullivan County Rural Yes 13.3 (8.9, 19.2) 50 (7, 59) 6 falling falling trend -4.8 (-15.2, -3.3)
Queens County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.4, 14.2) 51 (36, 55) 162 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.5, -2.8)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 13.1 (7.9, 20.6) 52 (4, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.4)
Washington County Urban Yes 11.9 (7.7, 17.9) 53 (9, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.9)
Columbia County Rural Yes 11.6 (7.7, 17.2) 54 (15, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Putnam County Urban Yes 11.5 (7.8, 16.4) 55 (18, 59) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.5)
Oswego County Urban Yes 11.3 (7.7, 16.0) 56 (20, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.5)
Delaware County Rural Yes 11.2 (6.9, 17.9) 57 (10, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.0, -2.1)
Rockland County Urban Yes 11.2 (9.0, 13.7) 58 (37, 59) 19 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.0, -3.2)
Tioga County Urban Yes 10.9 (6.5, 17.5) 59 (14, 59) 4 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.8, -2.6)
Cortland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/11/2024 1:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top