Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) N/A 1,224 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
United States *** 5.3 (5.2, 5.3) N/A 20,288 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Franklin County *** 5.5 (3.1, 9.0) 26 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Genesee County *** 3.8 (2.1, 6.3) 54 (8, 54) 3
*
*
Schoharie County *** 6.8 (3.8, 11.6) 7 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Wyoming County *** 6.3 (3.6, 10.5) 11 (1, 54) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Essex County *** 5.3 (3.1, 9.0) 32 (1, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Fulton County *** 4.9 (2.9, 8.1) 39 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -29.7 (-54.3, 8.2)
Orleans County *** 6.3 (3.7, 10.2) 12 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Seneca County *** 7.6 (4.4, 12.4) 2 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Tioga County *** 4.9 (2.9, 8.0) 40 (2, 54) 4
*
*
Chenango County *** 5.8 (3.5, 9.3) 22 (1, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.1)
Livingston County *** 4.6 (2.8, 7.3) 47 (3, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.5)
Delaware County *** 5.5 (3.4, 8.7) 27 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.8)
Herkimer County *** 5.0 (3.1, 7.9) 36 (2, 54) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Washington County *** 5.2 (3.2, 8.1) 35 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Greene County *** 6.6 (4.1, 10.3) 10 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.7)
Jefferson County *** 4.0 (2.5, 6.0) 53 (9, 54) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Tompkins County *** 4.7 (3.0, 7.0) 46 (4, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Clinton County *** 5.3 (3.5, 7.9) 33 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Otsego County *** 5.8 (3.7, 8.9) 19 (1, 54) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Warren County *** 5.9 (3.9, 8.8) 16 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Madison County *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 5 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Cattaraugus County *** 5.8 (4.0, 8.3) 21 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Steuben County *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.6) 34 (2, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Cayuga County *** 5.9 (4.1, 8.4) 17 (1, 54) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Wayne County *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.8) 24 (2, 54) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Oswego County *** 5.5 (3.9, 7.6) 25 (2, 54) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
St. Lawrence County *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 29 (2, 54) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Columbia County *** 7.6 (5.3, 10.7) 3 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Chemung County *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.2) 9 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Putnam County *** 6.8 (4.9, 9.3) 6 (1, 52) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Schenectady County *** 5.0 (3.7, 6.6) 38 (6, 54) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Chautauqua County *** 5.8 (4.4, 7.6) 20 (2, 53) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Rensselaer County *** 6.1 (4.6, 7.9) 14 (1, 52) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Ontario County *** 8.0 (6.1, 10.4) 1 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Broome County *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.4) 37 (8, 54) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Ulster County *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.0) 28 (4, 53) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Dutchess County *** 4.5 (3.6, 5.5) 49 (18, 54) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Rockland County *** 4.7 (3.8, 5.8) 43 (14, 54) 18 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Niagara County *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.5) 13 (2, 47) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Saratoga County *** 6.7 (5.4, 8.2) 8 (1, 38) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Albany County *** 5.4 (4.4, 6.6) 30 (6, 51) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Oneida County *** 7.1 (5.8, 8.6) 4 (1, 32) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Orange County *** 5.7 (4.7, 6.8) 23 (5, 49) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Richmond County *** 4.3 (3.6, 5.2) 50 (24, 54) 24 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.7)
Onondaga County *** 4.7 (3.9, 5.6) 44 (17, 54) 28 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Monroe County *** 6.0 (5.4, 6.8) 15 (5, 35) 58 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Westchester County *** 4.7 (4.2, 5.3) 45 (24, 52) 62 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.1, -2.7)
Bronx County *** 4.9 (4.4, 5.4) 41 (21, 50) 70 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Erie County *** 5.8 (5.2, 6.5) 18 (8, 36) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
New York County *** 4.3 (3.9, 4.7) 51 (33, 54) 88 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -2.4)
Suffolk County *** 4.8 (4.4, 5.3) 42 (23, 49) 92 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Nassau County *** 5.4 (4.9, 5.9) 31 (15, 42) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Kings County *** 4.1 (3.8, 4.5) 52 (38, 54) 113 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Queens County *** 4.5 (4.1, 4.9) 48 (31, 52) 125 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Allegany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cortland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/22/2021 3:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top