Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A *** 5.2 (5.1, 5.3) N/A 1,317 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.5)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Queens County Urban *** 4.1 (3.8, 4.5) 52 (43, 55) 120 falling falling trend -7.9 (-13.2, -4.2)
Kings County Urban *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.2) 54 (46, 56) 115 falling falling trend -7.2 (-13.9, -2.4)
Suffolk County Urban *** 5.4 (4.9, 5.9) 41 (21, 47) 108 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Nassau County Urban *** 5.5 (5.0, 6.0) 38 (20, 46) 106 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -1.4)
New York County Urban *** 4.6 (4.1, 5.0) 48 (35, 53) 96 falling falling trend -5.1 (-12.3, -1.9)
Erie County Urban *** 6.0 (5.4, 6.7) 25 (11, 40) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Bronx County Urban *** 4.5 (4.0, 5.0) 50 (36, 55) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Westchester County Urban *** 4.7 (4.2, 5.3) 46 (31, 54) 65 falling falling trend -2.3 (-9.7, -1.6)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.9 (5.2, 6.6) 27 (13, 44) 59 falling falling trend -3.6 (-10.0, -1.5)
Richmond County Urban *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.8) 32 (11, 47) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Onondaga County Urban *** 5.5 (4.7, 6.4) 39 (13, 50) 34 falling falling trend -4.2 (-13.8, -1.1)
Albany County Urban *** 6.1 (5.0, 7.3) 24 (7, 48) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Niagara County Urban *** 8.0 (6.6, 9.6) 5 (1, 29) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Dutchess County Urban *** 5.9 (4.8, 7.1) 30 (8, 49) 24 falling falling trend -3.0 (-12.8, -1.6)
Orange County Urban *** 5.0 (4.1, 6.1) 43 (18, 55) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Oneida County Urban *** 6.5 (5.3, 7.9) 20 (4, 46) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Rockland County Urban *** 5.0 (4.1, 6.2) 44 (16, 54) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Saratoga County Urban *** 6.3 (5.1, 7.7) 22 (5, 47) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Broome County Urban *** 5.5 (4.3, 7.0) 36 (8, 54) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Ulster County Urban *** 5.5 (4.3, 7.0) 37 (8, 54) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Schenectady County Urban *** 7.2 (5.6, 9.1) 9 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Rensselaer County Urban *** 6.7 (5.2, 8.5) 17 (2, 49) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Ontario County Urban *** 7.0 (5.3, 9.1) 11 (1, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.6)
Chemung County Urban *** 9.1 (6.7, 12.1) 2 (1, 36) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Steuben County Rural *** 7.0 (5.1, 9.5) 10 (1, 51) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Chautauqua County Rural *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.3) 47 (15, 56) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
St. Lawrence County Rural *** 6.4 (4.6, 8.7) 21 (2, 54) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Clinton County Rural *** 7.9 (5.6, 10.8) 6 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.2)
Oswego County Urban *** 6.0 (4.2, 8.2) 26 (3, 55) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Putnam County Urban *** 5.9 (4.1, 8.2) 29 (4, 56) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.5)
Wayne County Urban *** 5.6 (3.9, 7.9) 34 (4, 56) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Cayuga County Rural *** 5.8 (4.0, 8.4) 31 (3, 56) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Columbia County Rural *** 6.8 (4.5, 10.0) 13 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Jefferson County Urban *** 5.5 (3.7, 7.7) 40 (5, 56) 7 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Delaware County Rural *** 9.0 (5.8, 13.5) 3 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Warren County Urban *** 5.9 (4.0, 8.6) 28 (3, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural *** 10.1 (6.8, 14.6) 1 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.7)
Herkimer County Urban *** 6.8 (4.5, 10.0) 14 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Livingston County Urban *** 6.5 (4.4, 9.6) 18 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Genesee County Rural *** 6.8 (4.4, 10.1) 12 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Washington County Urban *** 6.7 (4.4, 10.0) 15 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Cattaraugus County Rural *** 4.5 (2.9, 6.8) 49 (9, 56) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.2)
Montgomery County Rural *** 8.5 (5.5, 12.6) 4 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Otsego County Rural *** 5.6 (3.5, 8.7) 35 (2, 56) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Allegany County Rural *** 7.3 (4.5, 11.4) 8 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Fulton County Rural *** 6.7 (4.1, 10.4) 16 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.9)
Sullivan County Rural *** 4.0 (2.5, 6.2) 53 (14, 56) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Tompkins County Urban *** 3.5 (2.1, 5.5) 56 (25, 56) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Chenango County Rural *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.1) 33 (2, 56) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.7)
Madison County Urban *** 4.2 (2.5, 6.8) 51 (9, 56) 4
*
*
Tioga County Urban *** 4.9 (3.0, 8.0) 45 (4, 56) 4
*
*
Schoharie County Urban *** 7.8 (4.6, 12.9) 7 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 3.9 (2.2, 6.6) 55 (13, 56) 3
*
*
Orleans County Urban *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.1) 23 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Cortland County Rural *** 5.3 (3.0, 8.9) 42 (2, 56) 3
*
*
Seneca County Rural *** 6.5 (3.7, 11.0) 19 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Essex County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yates County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 5:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top