Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 130.8 (129.6, 132.0) N/A 9,449 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Alamance County Urban No 147.0 (137.4, 157.1) 26 (10, 62) 184 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Alexander County Urban No 131.0 (112.5, 152.1) 63 (9, 98) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Anson County Urban No 164.8 (137.1, 197.1) 11 (1, 82) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Brunswick County Urban No 123.5 (114.7, 133.0) 82 (41, 95) 182 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.9)
Buncombe County Urban Yes 118.3 (111.8, 125.2) 90 (63, 96) 263 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Burke County Urban No 130.3 (118.6, 143.0) 64 (23, 94) 97 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.0, -0.7)
Cabarrus County Urban Yes 122.0 (113.7, 130.9) 86 (46, 96) 161 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Caldwell County Urban No 145.8 (132.4, 160.3) 29 (7, 76) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.5)
Camden County Urban Yes 119.9 (85.4, 165.0) 89 (3, 100) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.6)
Catawba County Urban No 126.3 (117.2, 136.0) 74 (37, 94) 150 falling falling trend -1.4 (-4.2, -1.0)
Chatham County Urban Yes 106.9 (96.1, 118.9) 97 (71, 100) 80 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Cumberland County Urban No 150.5 (142.6, 158.7) 22 (10, 49) 279 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Currituck County Urban No 125.3 (102.5, 152.0) 79 (10, 100) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Davidson County Urban No 145.7 (136.3, 155.7) 30 (12, 64) 187 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Davie County Urban No 129.1 (112.9, 147.6) 68 (17, 99) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Durham County Urban Yes 122.2 (115.2, 129.6) 85 (51, 95) 234 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Edgecombe County Urban No 149.6 (132.7, 168.4) 23 (4, 79) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Forsyth County Urban No 137.7 (131.4, 144.3) 42 (27, 70) 370 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -1.0)
Franklin County Urban No 133.9 (119.1, 150.1) 55 (12, 95) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Gaston County Urban No 135.5 (127.4, 144.0) 49 (24, 79) 217 falling falling trend -2.1 (-5.6, -1.0)
Gates County Urban No 137.3 (101.0, 184.2) 43 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.4)
Guilford County Urban No 129.7 (124.3, 135.2) 67 (42, 83) 462 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Henderson County Urban No 125.8 (116.3, 136.0) 76 (36, 93) 147 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hoke County Urban No 157.5 (135.2, 182.3) 16 (2, 83) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Iredell County Urban No 123.7 (115.1, 132.8) 81 (44, 94) 159 falling falling trend -1.0 (-5.4, -0.3)
Johnston County Urban No 136.6 (127.5, 146.2) 45 (22, 81) 174 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 122.4 (110.3, 135.6) 84 (34, 98) 79 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Madison County Urban No 133.2 (109.3, 161.7) 57 (5, 100) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Mecklenburg County Urban Yes 114.9 (111.0, 118.9) 93 (77, 97) 678 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -1.7)
Moore County Urban No 126.7 (116.0, 138.3) 72 (31, 95) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Nash County Urban No 138.9 (126.9, 152.0) 38 (13, 84) 103 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.3, -0.7)
New Hanover County Urban No 126.3 (118.6, 134.3) 75 (43, 93) 216 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Onslow County Urban No 178.0 (165.3, 191.5) 2 (1, 18) 149 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.5)
Orange County Urban Yes 106.7 (97.3, 116.9) 98 (76, 100) 98 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -2.0)
Pender County Urban No 141.9 (126.2, 159.4) 34 (6, 87) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.4)
Person County Urban No 139.9 (121.8, 160.5) 36 (8, 92) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Pitt County Urban No 137.9 (127.6, 148.7) 41 (17, 81) 141 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Randolph County Urban No 146.7 (136.3, 157.9) 27 (10, 66) 154 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Rockingham County Urban No 133.8 (122.1, 146.5) 56 (18, 89) 103 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -1.1)
Rowan County Urban No 136.5 (126.6, 147.2) 46 (19, 83) 146 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.3, -1.8)
Stokes County Urban No 143.8 (126.7, 163.1) 32 (5, 89) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Union County Urban Yes 118.0 (109.9, 126.6) 91 (59, 98) 160 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Wake County Urban Yes 108.8 (105.1, 112.7) 95 (85, 100) 658 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -1.9)
Wayne County Urban No 164.9 (152.2, 178.5) 10 (2, 38) 131 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Yadkin County Urban No 132.8 (115.0, 153.2) 60 (11, 97) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Alleghany County Rural No 128.8 (100.1, 166.5) 69 (3, 100) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Ashe County Rural No 134.2 (114.3, 157.5) 54 (7, 98) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Avery County Rural No 125.5 (98.9, 158.5) 78 (6, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Beaufort County Rural No 135.0 (118.6, 153.5) 51 (12, 94) 54 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Bertie County Rural No 157.1 (127.1, 193.2) 17 (1, 94) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Bladen County Rural No 144.6 (123.2, 169.1) 31 (3, 92) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Carteret County Rural No 134.4 (121.5, 148.7) 52 (17, 91) 89 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Caswell County Rural No 138.9 (115.1, 167.2) 39 (4, 99) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Cherokee County Rural No 133.0 (114.3, 154.9) 59 (10, 99) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.6, -0.5)
Chowan County Rural Yes 120.2 (93.8, 153.5) 88 (8, 100) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 126.5 (96.0, 166.8) 73 (3, 100) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Cleveland County Rural No 158.0 (145.1, 171.8) 14 (3, 53) 118 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.4)
Columbus County Rural No 165.9 (147.9, 185.9) 8 (1, 52) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Craven County Rural No 141.4 (129.4, 154.3) 35 (12, 80) 112 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Dare County Rural Yes 120.3 (102.8, 140.5) 87 (22, 100) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Duplin County Rural No 138.5 (121.0, 157.9) 40 (7, 92) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Graham County Rural No 145.8 (107.1, 197.3) 28 (1, 100) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Granville County Rural No 152.4 (136.1, 170.4) 20 (3, 71) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Greene County Rural No 136.0 (108.2, 169.6) 47 (3, 100) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Halifax County Rural No 166.0 (148.0, 185.9) 7 (1, 50) 69 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Harnett County Rural No 147.1 (135.1, 159.9) 25 (8, 69) 113 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Haywood County Rural No 128.8 (115.7, 143.4) 70 (22, 96) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Hertford County Rural No 130.0 (107.0, 157.5) 65 (7, 100) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Hyde County Rural No 153.1 (105.3, 225.8) 19 (1, 100) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 105.0 (88.9, 123.6) 100 (51, 100) 33 falling falling trend -3.4 (-12.0, -1.6)
Jones County Rural No 135.6 (100.4, 181.9) 48 (1, 100) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Lee County Rural No 134.2 (119.0, 151.0) 53 (12, 94) 59 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lenoir County Rural No 137.1 (121.8, 154.1) 44 (10, 92) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Macon County Rural Yes 115.6 (100.0, 133.6) 92 (35, 100) 45 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Martin County Rural No 158.8 (134.3, 187.4) 13 (1, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
McDowell County Rural No 164.0 (144.9, 185.4) 12 (2, 58) 58 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.3)
Mitchell County Rural No 165.5 (133.4, 204.4) 9 (1, 89) 22 stable stable trend 12.7 (-0.1, 23.1)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 108.6 (89.4, 131.6) 96 (34, 100) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Northampton County Rural No 128.4 (103.1, 159.6) 71 (4, 100) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Pamlico County Rural Yes 122.5 (92.6, 162.1) 83 (3, 100) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Pasquotank County Rural No 133.1 (114.5, 154.1) 58 (8, 99) 39 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.8, -1.1)
Perquimans County Rural No 124.9 (98.2, 158.8) 80 (5, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Polk County Rural No 129.8 (104.5, 160.9) 66 (4, 100) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Richmond County Rural No 175.9 (155.1, 199.1) 4 (1, 37) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Robeson County Rural No 152.0 (139.5, 165.2) 21 (6, 62) 116 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Rutherford County Rural No 139.7 (125.4, 155.5) 37 (10, 87) 76 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Sampson County Rural No 154.0 (137.4, 172.2) 18 (4, 73) 66 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Scotland County Rural No 177.9 (154.5, 204.3) 3 (1, 41) 45 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Stanly County Rural No 147.3 (131.8, 164.3) 24 (6, 79) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.2)
Surry County Rural No 157.9 (143.5, 173.4) 15 (3, 54) 95 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Swain County Rural No 219.1 (180.1, 264.9) 1 (1, 19) 24 rising rising trend 8.0 (0.8, 21.6)
Transylvania County Rural Yes 105.4 (90.1, 123.6) 99 (57, 100) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Tyrrell County Rural No 125.7 (77.6, 205.2) 77 (1, 100) 4
*
*
Vance County Rural No 166.4 (146.4, 188.6) 6 (1, 53) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Warren County Rural No 131.3 (106.5, 161.6) 61 (6, 100) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 175.5 (136.3, 224.0) 5 (1, 89) 17 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.3, 24.1)
Watauga County Rural Yes 114.4 (97.9, 133.3) 94 (33, 100) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Wilkes County Rural No 142.0 (127.8, 157.7) 33 (8, 83) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Wilson County Rural No 135.4 (122.2, 149.7) 50 (15, 90) 83 falling falling trend -2.5 (-9.8, -1.0)
Yancey County Rural No 131.0 (107.8, 159.2) 62 (6, 100) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/17/2025 4:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top