Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 6.6 (6.4, 6.8) N/A 884 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
United States *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.7) N/A 27,509 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Mecklenburg County *** 7.0 (6.3, 7.8) 33 (16, 52) 75 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.9, 3.3)
Wake County *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.5) 58 (33, 68) 63 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.2, 4.0)
Guilford County *** 6.1 (5.3, 7.0) 53 (25, 67) 39 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.9, 3.7)
Forsyth County *** 7.0 (6.0, 8.2) 35 (12, 61) 34 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.3, 4.3)
Gaston County *** 8.8 (7.4, 10.6) 12 (2, 40) 26 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.4, 4.7)
Buncombe County *** 6.3 (5.2, 7.6) 49 (18, 68) 24 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.4, 3.8)
Cumberland County *** 6.8 (5.6, 8.1) 37 (13, 66) 24 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.1, 3.9)
Durham County *** 6.5 (5.3, 7.9) 41 (14, 68) 22 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.1)
Alamance County *** 8.5 (6.9, 10.4) 17 (2, 53) 19 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.5, 5.9)
New Hanover County *** 5.9 (4.7, 7.3) 55 (22, 71) 19 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Davidson County *** 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 38 (11, 68) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.1, 4.9)
Union County *** 6.4 (5.0, 8.0) 47 (12, 70) 16 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.4)
Cabarrus County *** 7.0 (5.5, 8.8) 34 (8, 68) 16 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.1)
Brunswick County *** 4.8 (3.7, 6.4) 70 (35, 72) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Onslow County *** 9.7 (7.5, 12.2) 6 (1, 46) 14
*
*
Randolph County *** 7.1 (5.5, 9.0) 31 (6, 67) 14 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.8, 5.1)
Rowan County *** 7.4 (5.7, 9.4) 26 (5, 67) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.8, 5.2)
Iredell County *** 6.1 (4.7, 7.7) 54 (16, 71) 14 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.0)
Robeson County *** 8.8 (6.8, 11.2) 13 (1, 56) 14 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.6, 6.1)
Wayne County *** 8.1 (6.2, 10.4) 19 (2, 63) 13
*
*
Pitt County *** 6.4 (4.9, 8.2) 44 (11, 71) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.1, 4.5)
Catawba County *** 5.7 (4.3, 7.3) 60 (18, 72) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Cleveland County *** 8.6 (6.5, 11.2) 16 (1, 59) 12
*
*
Johnston County *** 5.0 (3.7, 6.5) 68 (30, 72) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Moore County *** 6.5 (4.8, 8.5) 42 (8, 71) 11
*
*
Craven County *** 7.6 (5.6, 10.1) 23 (3, 67) 11
*
*
Nash County *** 8.1 (6.0, 10.8) 18 (2, 65) 10 stable stable trend -16.7 (-42.3, 20.4)
Rockingham County *** 6.9 (5.1, 9.3) 36 (6, 71) 10
*
*
Burke County *** 7.1 (5.2, 9.6) 30 (4, 70) 10
*
*
Henderson County *** 4.7 (3.4, 6.4) 71 (32, 72) 10
*
*
Rutherford County *** 8.9 (6.5, 12.1) 10 (1, 64) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.8, 6.1)
Orange County *** 5.4 (3.9, 7.3) 63 (17, 72) 9
*
*
Stanly County *** 9.6 (7.0, 13.1) 7 (1, 57) 9 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.9, 5.4)
Harnett County *** 6.1 (4.4, 8.3) 52 (9, 72) 9 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.7)
Carteret County *** 7.4 (5.2, 10.4) 27 (2, 71) 8
*
*
Lincoln County *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.3) 39 (5, 71) 8
*
*
Caldwell County *** 6.4 (4.5, 9.0) 43 (6, 72) 8
*
*
Granville County *** 8.7 (6.1, 12.1) 15 (1, 68) 8
*
*
Haywood County *** 6.4 (4.4, 9.2) 46 (6, 72) 7
*
*
Vance County *** 9.9 (6.8, 14.2) 5 (1, 62) 7
*
*
Wilson County *** 5.9 (4.0, 8.4) 56 (10, 72) 7
*
*
Chatham County *** 4.9 (3.4, 7.1) 69 (22, 72) 7
*
*
Edgecombe County *** 8.0 (5.4, 11.5) 22 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Lee County *** 8.1 (5.5, 11.5) 21 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Pender County *** 7.2 (4.9, 10.5) 29 (2, 72) 6
*
*
Surry County *** 6.2 (4.2, 8.9) 51 (5, 72) 6
*
*
McDowell County *** 8.7 (5.8, 12.7) 14 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Halifax County *** 7.5 (4.9, 11.1) 24 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Wilkes County *** 5.1 (3.4, 7.6) 67 (15, 72) 6
*
*
Scotland County *** 10.9 (7.2, 16.1) 2 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Dare County *** 8.1 (5.2, 12.4) 20 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Columbus County *** 6.4 (4.1, 9.6) 45 (4, 72) 5
*
*
Franklin County *** 5.7 (3.7, 8.5) 61 (8, 72) 5
*
*
Sampson County *** 5.5 (3.6, 8.3) 62 (9, 72) 5
*
*
Jackson County *** 8.9 (5.5, 13.6) 11 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Bladen County *** 9.2 (5.8, 14.2) 8 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Lenoir County *** 5.3 (3.4, 8.1) 65 (12, 72) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.6)
Beaufort County *** 5.8 (3.6, 9.1) 57 (6, 72) 5
*
*
Macon County *** 6.4 (3.9, 10.3) 48 (3, 72) 4
*
*
Yadkin County *** 7.3 (4.5, 11.5) 28 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Duplin County *** 4.6 (2.8, 7.4) 72 (14, 72) 4
*
*
Person County *** 7.4 (4.5, 11.9) 25 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Richmond County *** 6.6 (3.9, 10.5) 40 (2, 72) 4 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 4.6)
Stokes County *** 5.4 (3.2, 8.7) 64 (8, 72) 4
*
*
Alexander County *** 6.2 (3.7, 10.1) 50 (3, 72) 4
*
*
Ashe County *** 7.0 (4.1, 12.1) 32 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Greene County *** 12.5 (7.3, 20.4) 1 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Montgomery County *** 9.2 (5.4, 15.1) 9 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Transylvania County *** 5.7 (3.1, 10.2) 59 (2, 72) 4
*
*
Martin County *** 10.0 (5.5, 17.0) 4 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Watauga County *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.7) 66 (7, 72) 3
*
*
Yancey County *** 10.0 (5.7, 17.4) 3 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/07/2023 8:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top