Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 6.6 (6.4, 6.8) N/A 811 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.6)
United States *** 6.6 (6.5, 6.6) N/A 25,633 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Yancey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County *** 7.1 (5.0, 9.8) 32 (3, 64) 8
*
*
Wilkes County *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.5) 65 (27, 66) 5
*
*
Wayne County *** 6.5 (4.8, 8.5) 45 (8, 65) 11
*
*
Watauga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wake County *** 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) 53 (28, 62) 55 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.4, 4.5)
Vance County *** 11.1 (7.7, 15.7) 2 (1, 54) 7
*
*
Union County *** 5.3 (4.0, 6.9) 62 (21, 66) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.5)
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County *** 7.6 (5.4, 10.6) 18 (2, 64) 8
*
*
Stokes County *** 7.8 (5.1, 11.7) 13 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Stanly County *** 6.6 (4.3, 9.8) 44 (3, 66) 5 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 4.7)
Scotland County *** 10.1 (6.3, 15.5) 3 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Sampson County *** 6.2 (4.1, 9.2) 48 (5, 66) 6
*
*
Rutherford County *** 6.6 (4.5, 9.4) 43 (3, 66) 7 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 5.5)
Rowan County *** 5.9 (4.4, 7.8) 55 (13, 66) 11 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.5, 5.7)
Rockingham County *** 9.5 (7.3, 12.3) 7 (1, 50) 13
*
*
Robeson County *** 7.1 (5.3, 9.4) 31 (3, 64) 11 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.0, 6.5)
Richmond County *** 9.7 (6.4, 14.2) 6 (1, 63) 6 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 5.4)
Randolph County *** 6.8 (5.2, 8.8) 40 (6, 63) 13 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.4)
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitt County *** 7.7 (6.0, 9.9) 16 (3, 59) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.7, 5.3)
Person County *** 8.2 (5.1, 12.7) 11 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.8) 21 (2, 66) 6
*
*
Pasquotank County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County *** 5.6 (4.0, 7.7) 58 (12, 66) 8
*
*
Onslow County *** 7.3 (5.4, 9.7) 23 (2, 63) 10
*
*
Northampton County *** 9.8 (5.6, 16.9) 4 (1, 66) 3
*
*
New Hanover County *** 7.0 (5.7, 8.6) 35 (7, 60) 19 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.0, 5.3)
Nash County *** 9.8 (7.4, 12.7) 5 (1, 48) 12 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.1, 6.6)
Moore County *** 7.1 (5.4, 9.4) 30 (4, 64) 11
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecklenburg County *** 6.9 (6.1, 7.7) 39 (14, 53) 67 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.9, 3.6)
McDowell County *** 5.5 (3.3, 8.8) 60 (6, 66) 4
*
*
Martin County *** 13.6 (8.4, 21.1) 1 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County *** 7.2 (5.1, 10.0) 28 (3, 65) 8
*
*
Lenoir County *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.3) 37 (2, 66) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.5)
Lee County *** 7.7 (5.0, 11.4) 17 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County *** 4.4 (3.2, 5.9) 64 (38, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Jackson County *** 7.9 (4.6, 12.8) 12 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Iredell County *** 5.9 (4.5, 7.6) 54 (13, 65) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.0)
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County *** 5.9 (4.3, 7.9) 56 (10, 66) 11
*
*
Haywood County *** 5.3 (3.5, 7.9) 61 (12, 66) 6
*
*
Harnett County *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.1) 42 (4, 65) 8 stable stable trend -31.3 (-59.5, 16.3)
Halifax County *** 6.9 (4.6, 10.2) 38 (2, 66) 6
*
*
Guilford County *** 6.4 (5.5, 7.4) 46 (16, 60) 39 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.2, 4.3)
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.7) 24 (2, 66) 6
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaston County *** 9.0 (7.5, 10.9) 8 (1, 38) 24 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.4)
Franklin County *** 6.2 (4.0, 9.3) 49 (5, 66) 5
*
*
Forsyth County *** 6.3 (5.3, 7.4) 47 (16, 62) 29 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.4, 4.8)
Edgecombe County *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.3) 50 (4, 66) 5
*
*
Durham County *** 7.3 (5.9, 8.8) 26 (7, 58) 23 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.6, 4.0)
Duplin County *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.3) 36 (3, 66) 6
*
*
Davie County *** 7.3 (4.7, 11.2) 22 (2, 66) 5
*
*
Davidson County *** 7.5 (5.9, 9.4) 20 (4, 58) 17 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.1, 5.7)
Dare County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County *** 7.3 (6.0, 8.7) 25 (6, 58) 23 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.6, 4.7)
Craven County *** 7.0 (5.1, 9.4) 34 (3, 64) 10
*
*
Columbus County *** 6.0 (3.8, 9.1) 52 (5, 66) 5
*
*
Cleveland County *** 7.8 (5.8, 10.4) 14 (2, 61) 10
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County *** 7.1 (4.1, 12.0) 33 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Chatham County *** 3.6 (2.2, 5.7) 66 (47, 66) 4
*
*
Catawba County *** 5.7 (4.3, 7.4) 57 (15, 66) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.2, 5.4)
Caswell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.9) 63 (22, 66) 5
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County *** 7.8 (5.6, 10.5) 15 (2, 62) 9
*
*
Cabarrus County *** 6.8 (5.3, 8.6) 41 (7, 63) 14 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.5)
Burke County *** 8.4 (6.2, 11.2) 10 (1, 59) 10
*
*
Buncombe County *** 7.2 (6.0, 8.7) 27 (6, 57) 26 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 4.5)
Brunswick County *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.3) 59 (18, 66) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Bladen County *** 9.0 (5.4, 14.2) 9 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Bertie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County *** 6.0 (3.7, 9.4) 51 (4, 66) 5
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alexander County *** 7.5 (4.6, 11.9) 19 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Alamance County *** 7.1 (5.6, 9.0) 29 (6, 61) 15 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.8, 6.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2020 2:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top