Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County
Pancreas, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | N/A | *** | 11.4 (11.2, 11.7) | N/A | 1,517 |
rising 
|
0.7 (0.2, 2.4) |
| United States | N/A | *** | 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) | N/A | 46,760 |
rising
|
0.3 (0.2, 0.3) |
| Chowan County | Rural | *** | 13.3 (7.3, 23.4) | 16 (1, 85) | 3 |
|
|
| Greene County | Rural | *** | 10.7 (6.1, 18.1) | 61 (1, 85) | 3 |
|
|
| Bertie County | Rural | *** | 11.5 (6.5, 19.6) | 46 (1, 85) | 3 |
stable 
|
-1.0 (-3.2, 1.2) |
| Hertford County | Rural | *** | 10.3 (5.9, 17.2) | 71 (2, 85) | 3 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.1, 0.3) |
| Northampton County | Rural | *** | 9.0 (5.2, 15.9) | 79 (5, 85) | 3 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.5, 3.1) |
| Polk County | Rural | *** | 7.7 (4.3, 14.1) | 83 (11, 85) | 3 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.5, 1.8) |
| Currituck County | Urban | *** | 9.0 (5.2, 14.9) | 80 (4, 85) | 4 |
|
|
| Anson County | Urban | *** | 12.9 (7.9, 20.3) | 22 (1, 85) | 4 |
|
|
| Bladen County | Rural | *** | 8.0 (4.9, 12.8) | 82 (13, 85) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.1, 1.6) |
| Jackson County | Rural | *** | 7.0 (4.3, 11.1) | 85 (28, 85) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.9, 2.4) |
| Hoke County | Urban | *** | 10.4 (6.3, 15.9) | 70 (2, 85) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.3, 1.5) |
| Watauga County | Rural | *** | 7.1 (4.5, 11.1) | 84 (29, 85) | 4 |
|
|
| Martin County | Rural | *** | 12.6 (7.8, 19.9) | 27 (1, 85) | 5 |
|
|
| Yancey County | Rural | *** | 13.5 (8.6, 21.2) | 13 (1, 85) | 5 |
|
|
| Warren County | Rural | *** | 14.0 (9.1, 21.6) | 9 (1, 84) | 5 |
|
|
| Ashe County | Rural | *** | 10.1 (6.6, 15.6) | 75 (4, 85) | 5 |
|
|
| Montgomery County | Rural | *** | 12.5 (8.1, 18.8) | 31 (1, 85) | 5 |
|
|
| Pasquotank County | Rural | *** | 11.3 (7.5, 16.5) | 51 (2, 85) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.2, 0.4) |
| Dare County | Rural | *** | 10.8 (7.2, 16.0) | 58 (2, 85) | 6 |
|
|
| Duplin County | Rural | *** | 8.6 (5.8, 12.4) | 81 (18, 85) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.0, 2.0) |
| Scotland County | Rural | *** | 13.2 (8.9, 19.0) | 17 (1, 84) | 6 |
|
|
| Cherokee County | Rural | *** | 13.2 (8.7, 19.6) | 19 (1, 84) | 7 |
|
|
| Transylvania County | Rural | *** | 9.0 (6.0, 13.8) | 77 (8, 85) | 7 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.4, 2.9) |
| Yadkin County | Urban | *** | 11.9 (8.1, 17.1) | 38 (2, 85) | 7 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.7, 3.3) |
| Caswell County | Rural | *** | 18.9 (12.9, 27.3) | 1 (1, 70) | 7 |
|
|
| Vance County | Rural | *** | 12.0 (8.3, 16.9) | 35 (2, 84) | 7 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.7, 1.9) |
| Alexander County | Urban | *** | 13.9 (9.8, 19.5) | 10 (1, 82) | 8 |
|
|
| Beaufort County | Rural | *** | 10.1 (7.1, 14.3) | 76 (7, 85) | 8 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.8, 1.6) |
| Macon County | Rural | *** | 11.1 (7.8, 15.7) | 56 (4, 85) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.7, 0.8) |
| Stokes County | Urban | *** | 11.3 (7.9, 15.9) | 52 (2, 85) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.9, 1.8) |
| Davie County | Urban | *** | 12.3 (8.8, 17.1) | 33 (1, 83) | 8 |
|
|
| Granville County | Rural | *** | 10.5 (7.5, 14.4) | 66 (5, 85) | 8 |
stable
|
18.4 (-1.7, 38.3) |
| McDowell County | Rural | *** | 12.6 (9.0, 17.4) | 28 (1, 83) | 9 |
|
|
| Richmond County | Rural | *** | 15.2 (10.9, 20.7) | 5 (1, 79) | 9 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.2, 3.6) |
| Person County | Urban | *** | 13.9 (10.0, 19.0) | 11 (1, 81) | 9 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.4, 3.0) |
| Franklin County | Urban | *** | 11.1 (8.1, 14.9) | 55 (5, 84) | 10 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 2.4) |
| Lee County | Rural | *** | 12.5 (9.2, 16.6) | 30 (2, 84) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.1, 1.2) |
| Sampson County | Rural | *** | 12.3 (9.1, 16.4) | 34 (2, 83) | 10 |
stable
|
1.2 (0.0, 2.8) |
| Edgecombe County | Urban | *** | 14.8 (10.9, 19.8) | 7 (1, 78) | 10 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.4, 1.8) |
| Pender County | Urban | *** | 12.6 (9.4, 16.7) | 29 (2, 82) | 11 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.3, 3.1) |
| Rutherford County | Rural | *** | 10.5 (7.9, 13.9) | 65 (8, 85) | 11 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.1, 1.5) |
| Lenoir County | Rural | *** | 13.0 (9.8, 17.1) | 21 (1, 81) | 11 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.1, 1.7) |
| Stanly County | Rural | *** | 14.1 (10.8, 18.3) | 8 (1, 77) | 12 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.2, 3.4) |
| Wilkes County | Rural | *** | 11.6 (8.8, 15.0) | 43 (5, 83) | 12 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.5) |
| Wilson County | Rural | *** | 11.1 (8.5, 14.4) | 54 (5, 83) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 1.0) |
| Lincoln County | Urban | *** | 11.6 (8.9, 14.9) | 44 (4, 82) | 13 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.9) |
| Columbus County | Rural | *** | 18.2 (14.1, 23.4) | 2 (1, 39) | 14 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.2, 2.7) |
| Nash County | Urban | *** | 10.2 (7.8, 13.1) | 73 (12, 84) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.8) |
| Halifax County | Rural | *** | 17.9 (13.8, 23.0) | 3 (1, 50) | 14 |
rising
|
1.4 (0.2, 2.8) |
| Surry County | Rural | *** | 12.5 (9.7, 15.9) | 32 (3, 80) | 14 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.1, 2.8) |
| Carteret County | Rural | *** | 10.8 (8.4, 13.9) | 60 (8, 84) | 14 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.1, 2.8) |
| Burke County | Urban | *** | 10.4 (8.0, 13.3) | 69 (11, 84) | 14 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.1, 1.8) |
| Orange County | Urban | *** | 9.0 (7.1, 11.4) | 78 (28, 85) | 15 |
falling 
|
-1.7 (-3.0, -0.2) |
| Chatham County | Urban | *** | 10.6 (8.3, 13.4) | 63 (12, 83) | 15 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Haywood County | Rural | *** | 12.8 (10.0, 16.3) | 24 (3, 79) | 15 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.5) |
| Caldwell County | Urban | *** | 13.1 (10.3, 16.4) | 20 (2, 77) | 16 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.7, 1.5) |
| Cleveland County | Rural | *** | 11.9 (9.5, 14.8) | 39 (5, 80) | 17 |
rising
|
1.2 (0.4, 2.2) |
| Craven County | Rural | *** | 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) | 41 (6, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.6) |
| Rockingham County | Urban | *** | 12.7 (10.2, 15.8) | 26 (3, 78) | 18 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.9, 1.2) |
| Onslow County | Urban | *** | 12.8 (10.3, 15.6) | 23 (3, 77) | 20 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.3, 2.2) |
| Wayne County | Urban | *** | 13.5 (10.9, 16.5) | 15 (2, 75) | 20 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.9, 1.4) |
| Harnett County | Rural | *** | 14.9 (12.1, 18.1) | 6 (1, 62) | 21 |
stable
|
1.2 (0.0, 3.0) |
| Robeson County | Rural | *** | 16.1 (13.2, 19.5) | 4 (1, 48) | 22 |
rising
|
1.5 (0.4, 3.0) |
| Catawba County | Urban | *** | 10.3 (8.4, 12.4) | 72 (19, 82) | 23 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.8, 1.3) |
| Moore County | Urban | *** | 13.2 (10.8, 16.0) | 18 (3, 75) | 23 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.2, 1.6) |
| Randolph County | Urban | *** | 11.5 (9.5, 13.8) | 48 (8, 80) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 1.1) |
| Cabarrus County | Urban | *** | 10.4 (8.6, 12.5) | 68 (19, 82) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.5) |
| Pitt County | Urban | *** | 13.7 (11.3, 16.4) | 12 (2, 67) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 1.1) |
| Iredell County | Urban | *** | 10.8 (9.0, 12.9) | 59 (14, 81) | 25 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.0, 1.3) |
| Rowan County | Urban | *** | 12.7 (10.6, 15.3) | 25 (5, 75) | 25 |
rising
|
1.1 (0.3, 2.0) |
| Johnston County | Urban | *** | 11.8 (9.8, 14.1) | 40 (9, 79) | 27 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.2, 1.8) |
| Alamance County | Urban | *** | 12.0 (10.0, 14.2) | 36 (7, 78) | 27 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.1, 2.2) |
| Union County | Urban | *** | 10.9 (9.1, 13.0) | 57 (15, 81) | 27 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.8, 1.3) |
| Davidson County | Urban | *** | 11.4 (9.5, 13.5) | 50 (12, 79) | 28 |
rising
|
0.8 (0.1, 1.8) |
| Henderson County | Urban | *** | 13.5 (11.3, 16.0) | 14 (3, 66) | 29 |
rising
|
1.1 (0.2, 2.3) |
| Gaston County | Urban | *** | 10.2 (8.6, 12.0) | 74 (23, 82) | 30 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.3, 1.5) |
| Brunswick County | Urban | *** | 10.6 (8.9, 12.7) | 62 (16, 82) | 32 |
stable
|
1.1 (0.0, 2.9) |
| New Hanover County | Urban | *** | 11.4 (9.7, 13.2) | 49 (13, 78) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 1.3) |
| Cumberland County | Urban | *** | 11.7 (10.1, 13.5) | 42 (11, 77) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.9, 1.0) |
| Durham County | Urban | *** | 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) | 45 (12, 77) | 39 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.8, 1.1) |
| Buncombe County | Urban | *** | 12.0 (10.5, 13.6) | 37 (12, 72) | 49 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.6, 1.2) |
| Forsyth County | Urban | *** | 11.5 (10.1, 13.0) | 47 (16, 74) | 55 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.8, 1.0) |
| Guilford County | Urban | *** | 11.3 (10.2, 12.5) | 53 (22, 74) | 73 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
| Mecklenburg County | Urban | *** | 10.5 (9.6, 11.5) | 64 (32, 77) | 108 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-0.7, 0.3) |
| Wake County | Urban | *** | 10.5 (9.6, 11.4) | 67 (37, 78) | 115 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.4, 0.3) |
| Alleghany County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Avery County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clay County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jones County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Madison County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitchell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pamlico County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perquimans County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Swain County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/09/2025 9:10 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/09/2025 9:10 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.