Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 11.4 (11.2, 11.7) N/A 1,517 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 2.4)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Alamance County Urban *** 12.0 (10.0, 14.2) 36 (7, 78) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.2)
Alexander County Urban *** 13.9 (9.8, 19.5) 10 (1, 82) 8
*
*
Anson County Urban *** 12.9 (7.9, 20.3) 22 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Ashe County Rural *** 10.1 (6.6, 15.6) 75 (4, 85) 5
*
*
Beaufort County Rural *** 10.1 (7.1, 14.3) 76 (7, 85) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Bertie County Rural *** 11.5 (6.5, 19.6) 46 (1, 85) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Bladen County Rural *** 8.0 (4.9, 12.8) 82 (13, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.6)
Brunswick County Urban *** 10.6 (8.9, 12.7) 62 (16, 82) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.9)
Buncombe County Urban *** 12.0 (10.5, 13.6) 37 (12, 72) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Burke County Urban *** 10.4 (8.0, 13.3) 69 (11, 84) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.8)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 10.4 (8.6, 12.5) 68 (19, 82) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.5)
Caldwell County Urban *** 13.1 (10.3, 16.4) 20 (2, 77) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.5)
Carteret County Rural *** 10.8 (8.4, 13.9) 60 (8, 84) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.8)
Caswell County Rural *** 18.9 (12.9, 27.3) 1 (1, 70) 7
*
*
Catawba County Urban *** 10.3 (8.4, 12.4) 72 (19, 82) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.3)
Chatham County Urban *** 10.6 (8.3, 13.4) 63 (12, 83) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.5)
Cherokee County Rural *** 13.2 (8.7, 19.6) 19 (1, 84) 7
*
*
Chowan County Rural *** 13.3 (7.3, 23.4) 16 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Cleveland County Rural *** 11.9 (9.5, 14.8) 39 (5, 80) 17 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.2)
Columbus County Rural *** 18.2 (14.1, 23.4) 2 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.7)
Craven County Rural *** 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) 41 (6, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.6)
Cumberland County Urban *** 11.7 (10.1, 13.5) 42 (11, 77) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Currituck County Urban *** 9.0 (5.2, 14.9) 80 (4, 85) 4
*
*
Dare County Rural *** 10.8 (7.2, 16.0) 58 (2, 85) 6
*
*
Davidson County Urban *** 11.4 (9.5, 13.5) 50 (12, 79) 28 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.8)
Davie County Urban *** 12.3 (8.8, 17.1) 33 (1, 83) 8
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 8.6 (5.8, 12.4) 81 (18, 85) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 2.0)
Durham County Urban *** 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) 45 (12, 77) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.1)
Edgecombe County Urban *** 14.8 (10.9, 19.8) 7 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Forsyth County Urban *** 11.5 (10.1, 13.0) 47 (16, 74) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Franklin County Urban *** 11.1 (8.1, 14.9) 55 (5, 84) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 2.4)
Gaston County Urban *** 10.2 (8.6, 12.0) 74 (23, 82) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.5)
Granville County Rural *** 10.5 (7.5, 14.4) 66 (5, 85) 8 stable stable trend 18.4 (-1.7, 38.3)
Greene County Rural *** 10.7 (6.1, 18.1) 61 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Guilford County Urban *** 11.3 (10.2, 12.5) 53 (22, 74) 73 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Halifax County Rural *** 17.9 (13.8, 23.0) 3 (1, 50) 14 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.8)
Harnett County Rural *** 14.9 (12.1, 18.1) 6 (1, 62) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 3.0)
Haywood County Rural *** 12.8 (10.0, 16.3) 24 (3, 79) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.5)
Henderson County Urban *** 13.5 (11.3, 16.0) 14 (3, 66) 29 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.3)
Hertford County Rural *** 10.3 (5.9, 17.2) 71 (2, 85) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.3)
Hoke County Urban *** 10.4 (6.3, 15.9) 70 (2, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.5)
Iredell County Urban *** 10.8 (9.0, 12.9) 59 (14, 81) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.3)
Jackson County Rural *** 7.0 (4.3, 11.1) 85 (28, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 2.4)
Johnston County Urban *** 11.8 (9.8, 14.1) 40 (9, 79) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8)
Lee County Rural *** 12.5 (9.2, 16.6) 30 (2, 84) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.2)
Lenoir County Rural *** 13.0 (9.8, 17.1) 21 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
Lincoln County Urban *** 11.6 (8.9, 14.9) 44 (4, 82) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.9)
Macon County Rural *** 11.1 (7.8, 15.7) 56 (4, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Martin County Rural *** 12.6 (7.8, 19.9) 27 (1, 85) 5
*
*
McDowell County Rural *** 12.6 (9.0, 17.4) 28 (1, 83) 9
*
*
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 10.5 (9.6, 11.5) 64 (32, 77) 108 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.3)
Montgomery County Rural *** 12.5 (8.1, 18.8) 31 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Moore County Urban *** 13.2 (10.8, 16.0) 18 (3, 75) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.6)
Nash County Urban *** 10.2 (7.8, 13.1) 73 (12, 84) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.8)
New Hanover County Urban *** 11.4 (9.7, 13.2) 49 (13, 78) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.3)
Northampton County Rural *** 9.0 (5.2, 15.9) 79 (5, 85) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.1)
Onslow County Urban *** 12.8 (10.3, 15.6) 23 (3, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.2)
Orange County Urban *** 9.0 (7.1, 11.4) 78 (28, 85) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.2)
Pasquotank County Rural *** 11.3 (7.5, 16.5) 51 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Pender County Urban *** 12.6 (9.4, 16.7) 29 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 3.1)
Person County Urban *** 13.9 (10.0, 19.0) 11 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 3.0)
Pitt County Urban *** 13.7 (11.3, 16.4) 12 (2, 67) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.1)
Polk County Rural *** 7.7 (4.3, 14.1) 83 (11, 85) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.8)
Randolph County Urban *** 11.5 (9.5, 13.8) 48 (8, 80) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.1)
Richmond County Rural *** 15.2 (10.9, 20.7) 5 (1, 79) 9 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.6)
Robeson County Rural *** 16.1 (13.2, 19.5) 4 (1, 48) 22 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 3.0)
Rockingham County Urban *** 12.7 (10.2, 15.8) 26 (3, 78) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Rowan County Urban *** 12.7 (10.6, 15.3) 25 (5, 75) 25 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.0)
Rutherford County Rural *** 10.5 (7.9, 13.9) 65 (8, 85) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Sampson County Rural *** 12.3 (9.1, 16.4) 34 (2, 83) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.8)
Scotland County Rural *** 13.2 (8.9, 19.0) 17 (1, 84) 6
*
*
Stanly County Rural *** 14.1 (10.8, 18.3) 8 (1, 77) 12 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.4)
Stokes County Urban *** 11.3 (7.9, 15.9) 52 (2, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.8)
Surry County Rural *** 12.5 (9.7, 15.9) 32 (3, 80) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.8)
Transylvania County Rural *** 9.0 (6.0, 13.8) 77 (8, 85) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.9)
Union County Urban *** 10.9 (9.1, 13.0) 57 (15, 81) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.3)
Vance County Rural *** 12.0 (8.3, 16.9) 35 (2, 84) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.9)
Wake County Urban *** 10.5 (9.6, 11.4) 67 (37, 78) 115 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Warren County Rural *** 14.0 (9.1, 21.6) 9 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Watauga County Rural *** 7.1 (4.5, 11.1) 84 (29, 85) 4
*
*
Wayne County Urban *** 13.5 (10.9, 16.5) 15 (2, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.4)
Wilkes County Rural *** 11.6 (8.8, 15.0) 43 (5, 83) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.5)
Wilson County Rural *** 11.1 (8.5, 14.4) 54 (5, 83) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Yadkin County Urban *** 11.9 (8.1, 17.1) 38 (2, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.3)
Yancey County Rural *** 13.5 (8.6, 21.2) 13 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top