Death Rates Table
County![]() |
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina | *** | 10.9 (10.6, 11.2) | N/A | 1,414 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-0.1, 0.2) |
United States | *** | 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) | N/A | 44,868 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (0.0, 0.2) |
Washington County | *** | 18.6 (10.4, 31.7) | 1 (1, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Caswell County | *** | 17.7 (11.8, 26.0) | 2 (1, 74) | 6 |
|
|
Halifax County | *** | 17.6 (13.5, 22.6) | 3 (1, 39) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
1.3 (0.0, 2.6) |
Richmond County | *** | 16.0 (11.7, 21.5) | 4 (1, 67) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
1.5 (-0.1, 3.0) |
Anson County | *** | 15.6 (10.2, 23.2) | 5 (1, 78) | 5 |
|
|
Columbus County | *** | 15.6 (11.9, 20.1) | 6 (1, 61) | 13 |
stable ![]() |
0.6 (-0.8, 2.0) |
Vance County | *** | 14.9 (10.7, 20.4) | 7 (1, 72) | 9 |
stable ![]() |
-0.1 (-1.7, 1.6) |
Davie County | *** | 14.3 (10.4, 19.4) | 8 (1, 75) | 9 |
|
|
Stokes County | *** | 14.2 (10.4, 19.2) | 9 (1, 73) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-1.7, 1.8) |
Bertie County | *** | 14.1 (8.7, 22.5) | 10 (1, 80) | 4 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-3.0, 1.1) |
Lenoir County | *** | 14.1 (10.7, 18.4) | 11 (1, 72) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
0.4 (-0.9, 1.6) |
Henderson County | *** | 14.0 (11.8, 16.6) | 12 (2, 52) | 30 |
rising ![]() |
1.2 (0.3, 2.1) |
Rowan County | *** | 13.8 (11.5, 16.4) | 13 (2, 59) | 27 |
rising ![]() |
1.2 (0.4, 2.1) |
Harnett County | *** | 13.7 (11.0, 16.8) | 14 (1, 64) | 18 |
falling ![]() |
-10.0 (-18.9, -0.2) |
Robeson County | *** | 13.6 (11.1, 16.6) | 15 (2, 64) | 22 |
stable ![]() |
0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
Scotland County | *** | 12.9 (8.7, 18.7) | 16 (1, 79) | 6 |
|
|
Pitt County | *** | 12.7 (10.5, 15.4) | 17 (3, 68) | 23 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.4) |
Martin County | *** | 12.6 (7.9, 19.5) | 18 (1, 81) | 5 |
|
|
Surry County | *** | 12.6 (9.8, 16.0) | 19 (2, 74) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
1.3 (0.0, 2.7) |
Person County | *** | 12.3 (8.6, 17.4) | 20 (2, 79) | 7 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-2.2, 2.4) |
Carteret County | *** | 12.3 (9.7, 15.7) | 21 (3, 75) | 16 |
rising ![]() |
1.5 (0.1, 2.9) |
Alexander County | *** | 12.2 (8.3, 17.6) | 22 (1, 80) | 7 |
|
|
Montgomery County | *** | 12.1 (7.6, 18.7) | 23 (1, 80) | 5 |
|
|
McDowell County | *** | 12.1 (8.6, 16.7) | 24 (2, 78) | 8 |
|
|
Cumberland County | *** | 12.0 (10.3, 13.9) | 25 (8, 67) | 38 |
stable ![]() |
-0.1 (-0.9, 0.7) |
Pasquotank County | *** | 12.0 (8.0, 17.4) | 26 (1, 81) | 6 |
stable ![]() |
-1.5 (-3.2, 0.1) |
Stanly County | *** | 11.8 (8.8, 15.8) | 27 (2, 78) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
0.9 (-0.5, 2.4) |
Warren County | *** | 11.8 (7.4, 18.9) | 28 (1, 81) | 4 |
|
|
Yadkin County | *** | 11.8 (7.9, 17.1) | 29 (1, 80) | 6 |
stable ![]() |
1.2 (-0.6, 3.0) |
Rockingham County | *** | 11.8 (9.4, 14.8) | 30 (5, 75) | 17 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-0.9, 1.1) |
Buncombe County | *** | 11.7 (10.2, 13.4) | 31 (9, 66) | 45 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-0.9, 0.9) |
Lee County | *** | 11.7 (8.4, 15.8) | 32 (2, 79) | 9 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-2.3, 0.9) |
Edgecombe County | *** | 11.5 (8.2, 15.9) | 33 (3, 79) | 9 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
Davidson County | *** | 11.4 (9.6, 13.6) | 34 (9, 74) | 27 |
rising ![]() |
1.0 (0.2, 1.9) |
Lincoln County | *** | 11.4 (8.7, 14.8) | 35 (4, 78) | 12 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
Moore County | *** | 11.4 (9.1, 14.2) | 36 (6, 76) | 19 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Wayne County | *** | 11.3 (9.0, 14.0) | 37 (6, 77) | 17 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
Cleveland County | *** | 11.3 (8.9, 14.2) | 38 (5, 77) | 16 |
rising ![]() |
1.3 (0.3, 2.3) |
Pender County | *** | 11.2 (8.1, 15.2) | 39 (3, 79) | 9 |
stable ![]() |
0.7 (-1.0, 2.4) |
Caldwell County | *** | 11.2 (8.6, 14.3) | 40 (6, 78) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-1.4, 1.0) |
Haywood County | *** | 11.1 (8.5, 14.6) | 41 (4, 78) | 13 |
stable ![]() |
0.4 (-1.0, 1.8) |
Alamance County | *** | 11.1 (9.2, 13.3) | 42 (8, 75) | 24 |
stable ![]() |
0.9 (-0.1, 1.8) |
Franklin County | *** | 11.1 (8.2, 14.8) | 43 (4, 80) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
0.5 (-1.0, 2.1) |
Craven County | *** | 11.1 (8.7, 14.0) | 44 (7, 78) | 16 |
stable ![]() |
0.5 (-0.8, 1.8) |
New Hanover County | *** | 11.0 (9.4, 12.8) | 45 (13, 72) | 35 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-1.5, 0.7) |
Dare County | *** | 11.0 (7.3, 16.2) | 46 (2, 81) | 6 |
|
|
Guilford County | *** | 11.0 (9.8, 12.2) | 47 (18, 69) | 68 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-0.7, 0.6) |
Sampson County | *** | 10.8 (8.0, 14.5) | 48 (6, 80) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
0.9 (-0.7, 2.4) |
Johnston County | *** | 10.7 (8.8, 13.0) | 49 (11, 77) | 23 |
stable ![]() |
0.6 (-0.4, 1.7) |
Union County | *** | 10.7 (8.9, 12.7) | 50 (12, 77) | 26 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Wake County | *** | 10.6 (9.7, 11.6) | 51 (25, 69) | 108 |
stable ![]() |
-0.1 (-0.5, 0.2) |
Iredell County | *** | 10.6 (8.7, 12.8) | 52 (14, 77) | 23 |
stable ![]() |
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) |
Hoke County | *** | 10.6 (6.3, 16.4) | 53 (1, 81) | 4 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-2.7, 1.3) |
Onslow County | *** | 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) | 54 (10, 79) | 16 |
stable ![]() |
0.3 (-0.9, 1.6) |
Rutherford County | *** | 10.5 (7.9, 13.9) | 55 (6, 80) | 11 |
stable ![]() |
0.1 (-1.3, 1.5) |
Cherokee County | *** | 10.5 (6.7, 16.3) | 56 (2, 81) | 5 |
|
|
Forsyth County | *** | 10.5 (9.2, 11.9) | 57 (21, 74) | 49 |
stable ![]() |
-0.1 (-0.9, 0.7) |
Chatham County | *** | 10.4 (8.1, 13.5) | 58 (9, 79) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
0.2 (-1.1, 1.5) |
Mecklenburg County | *** | 10.4 (9.5, 11.4) | 59 (28, 70) | 105 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-1.0, 0.1) |
Macon County | *** | 10.3 (7.0, 15.1) | 60 (4, 81) | 7 |
stable ![]() |
-1.0 (-2.4, 0.4) |
Nash County | *** | 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) | 61 (9, 79) | 13 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.4) |
Randolph County | *** | 10.2 (8.3, 12.5) | 62 (14, 78) | 20 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
Burke County | *** | 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) | 63 (10, 79) | 14 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
Ashe County | *** | 10.0 (6.5, 15.5) | 64 (4, 81) | 5 |
|
|
Durham County | *** | 10.0 (8.5, 11.7) | 65 (20, 77) | 32 |
stable ![]() |
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Gaston County | *** | 10.0 (8.4, 11.9) | 66 (19, 78) | 27 |
stable ![]() |
0.6 (-0.3, 1.5) |
Cabarrus County | *** | 9.9 (8.1, 12.0) | 67 (19, 79) | 22 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.4) |
Beaufort County | *** | 9.6 (6.7, 13.5) | 68 (8, 81) | 8 |
stable ![]() |
0.2 (-1.1, 1.6) |
Catawba County | *** | 9.5 (7.7, 11.6) | 69 (21, 79) | 21 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.7) |
Duplin County | *** | 9.5 (6.7, 13.2) | 70 (9, 81) | 8 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-2.7, 1.4) |
Wilkes County | *** | 9.5 (7.0, 12.7) | 71 (11, 81) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-1.7, 1.0) |
Brunswick County | *** | 9.3 (7.6, 11.3) | 72 (23, 79) | 25 |
stable ![]() |
0.0 (-1.4, 1.3) |
Wilson County | *** | 9.0 (6.6, 12.0) | 73 (15, 81) | 10 |
stable ![]() |
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
Hertford County | *** | 8.3 (4.7, 14.1) | 74 (7, 81) | 3 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-3.7, -0.4) |
Polk County | *** | 8.3 (4.8, 14.6) | 75 (7, 81) | 4 |
stable ![]() |
-0.2 (-2.3, 1.9) |
Granville County | *** | 8.1 (5.5, 11.7) | 76 (14, 81) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-3.6, -0.6) |
Orange County | *** | 8.1 (6.2, 10.5) | 77 (29, 81) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-2.3 (-3.6, -1.0) |
Transylvania County | *** | 7.8 (5.3, 11.8) | 78 (23, 81) | 6 |
stable ![]() |
0.2 (-1.7, 2.1) |
Watauga County | *** | 7.5 (4.8, 11.4) | 79 (21, 81) | 5 |
|
|
Jackson County | *** | 5.9 (3.4, 9.8) | 80 (39, 81) | 3 |
stable ![]() |
-0.7 (-2.7, 1.4) |
Bladen County | *** | 5.8 (3.3, 9.8) | 81 (46, 81) | 3 |
stable ![]() |
-1.5 (-3.9, 0.9) |
Alleghany County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Avery County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Chowan County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Currituck County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Greene County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Northampton County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Swain County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Yancey County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2023 3:53 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2023 3:53 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.