Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Pancreas, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 10.9 (10.6, 11.2) N/A 1,414 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.1, 0.2)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 44,868 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Washington County *** 18.6 (10.4, 31.7) 1 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Caswell County *** 17.7 (11.8, 26.0) 2 (1, 74) 6
*
*
Halifax County *** 17.6 (13.5, 22.6) 3 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Richmond County *** 16.0 (11.7, 21.5) 4 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.0)
Anson County *** 15.6 (10.2, 23.2) 5 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Columbus County *** 15.6 (11.9, 20.1) 6 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Vance County *** 14.9 (10.7, 20.4) 7 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Davie County *** 14.3 (10.4, 19.4) 8 (1, 75) 9
*
*
Stokes County *** 14.2 (10.4, 19.2) 9 (1, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Bertie County *** 14.1 (8.7, 22.5) 10 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Lenoir County *** 14.1 (10.7, 18.4) 11 (1, 72) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Henderson County *** 14.0 (11.8, 16.6) 12 (2, 52) 30 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Rowan County *** 13.8 (11.5, 16.4) 13 (2, 59) 27 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.1)
Harnett County *** 13.7 (11.0, 16.8) 14 (1, 64) 18 falling falling trend -10.0 (-18.9, -0.2)
Robeson County *** 13.6 (11.1, 16.6) 15 (2, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Scotland County *** 12.9 (8.7, 18.7) 16 (1, 79) 6
*
*
Pitt County *** 12.7 (10.5, 15.4) 17 (3, 68) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Martin County *** 12.6 (7.9, 19.5) 18 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Surry County *** 12.6 (9.8, 16.0) 19 (2, 74) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Person County *** 12.3 (8.6, 17.4) 20 (2, 79) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Carteret County *** 12.3 (9.7, 15.7) 21 (3, 75) 16 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.9)
Alexander County *** 12.2 (8.3, 17.6) 22 (1, 80) 7
*
*
Montgomery County *** 12.1 (7.6, 18.7) 23 (1, 80) 5
*
*
McDowell County *** 12.1 (8.6, 16.7) 24 (2, 78) 8
*
*
Cumberland County *** 12.0 (10.3, 13.9) 25 (8, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Pasquotank County *** 12.0 (8.0, 17.4) 26 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Stanly County *** 11.8 (8.8, 15.8) 27 (2, 78) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Warren County *** 11.8 (7.4, 18.9) 28 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Yadkin County *** 11.8 (7.9, 17.1) 29 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Rockingham County *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.8) 30 (5, 75) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Buncombe County *** 11.7 (10.2, 13.4) 31 (9, 66) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Lee County *** 11.7 (8.4, 15.8) 32 (2, 79) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Edgecombe County *** 11.5 (8.2, 15.9) 33 (3, 79) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Davidson County *** 11.4 (9.6, 13.6) 34 (9, 74) 27 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Lincoln County *** 11.4 (8.7, 14.8) 35 (4, 78) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Moore County *** 11.4 (9.1, 14.2) 36 (6, 76) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Wayne County *** 11.3 (9.0, 14.0) 37 (6, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Cleveland County *** 11.3 (8.9, 14.2) 38 (5, 77) 16 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
Pender County *** 11.2 (8.1, 15.2) 39 (3, 79) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Caldwell County *** 11.2 (8.6, 14.3) 40 (6, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Haywood County *** 11.1 (8.5, 14.6) 41 (4, 78) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Alamance County *** 11.1 (9.2, 13.3) 42 (8, 75) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.8)
Franklin County *** 11.1 (8.2, 14.8) 43 (4, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Craven County *** 11.1 (8.7, 14.0) 44 (7, 78) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
New Hanover County *** 11.0 (9.4, 12.8) 45 (13, 72) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Dare County *** 11.0 (7.3, 16.2) 46 (2, 81) 6
*
*
Guilford County *** 11.0 (9.8, 12.2) 47 (18, 69) 68 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Sampson County *** 10.8 (8.0, 14.5) 48 (6, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.4)
Johnston County *** 10.7 (8.8, 13.0) 49 (11, 77) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Union County *** 10.7 (8.9, 12.7) 50 (12, 77) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Wake County *** 10.6 (9.7, 11.6) 51 (25, 69) 108 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Iredell County *** 10.6 (8.7, 12.8) 52 (14, 77) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Hoke County *** 10.6 (6.3, 16.4) 53 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Onslow County *** 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) 54 (10, 79) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Rutherford County *** 10.5 (7.9, 13.9) 55 (6, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Cherokee County *** 10.5 (6.7, 16.3) 56 (2, 81) 5
*
*
Forsyth County *** 10.5 (9.2, 11.9) 57 (21, 74) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Chatham County *** 10.4 (8.1, 13.5) 58 (9, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Mecklenburg County *** 10.4 (9.5, 11.4) 59 (28, 70) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Macon County *** 10.3 (7.0, 15.1) 60 (4, 81) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Nash County *** 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) 61 (9, 79) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Randolph County *** 10.2 (8.3, 12.5) 62 (14, 78) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Burke County *** 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) 63 (10, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Ashe County *** 10.0 (6.5, 15.5) 64 (4, 81) 5
*
*
Durham County *** 10.0 (8.5, 11.7) 65 (20, 77) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Gaston County *** 10.0 (8.4, 11.9) 66 (19, 78) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Cabarrus County *** 9.9 (8.1, 12.0) 67 (19, 79) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Beaufort County *** 9.6 (6.7, 13.5) 68 (8, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Catawba County *** 9.5 (7.7, 11.6) 69 (21, 79) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Duplin County *** 9.5 (6.7, 13.2) 70 (9, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Wilkes County *** 9.5 (7.0, 12.7) 71 (11, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Brunswick County *** 9.3 (7.6, 11.3) 72 (23, 79) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Wilson County *** 9.0 (6.6, 12.0) 73 (15, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Hertford County *** 8.3 (4.7, 14.1) 74 (7, 81) 3 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Polk County *** 8.3 (4.8, 14.6) 75 (7, 81) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Granville County *** 8.1 (5.5, 11.7) 76 (14, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Orange County *** 8.1 (6.2, 10.5) 77 (29, 81) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Transylvania County *** 7.8 (5.3, 11.8) 78 (23, 81) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Watauga County *** 7.5 (4.8, 11.4) 79 (21, 81) 5
*
*
Jackson County *** 5.9 (3.4, 9.8) 80 (39, 81) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Bladen County *** 5.8 (3.3, 9.8) 81 (46, 81) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 9:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top