Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.1) N/A 342 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 3.7)
United States *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 10,923 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Alamance County *** 4.6 (3.0, 6.8) 24 (4, 34) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Brunswick County *** 4.9 (3.0, 7.8) 19 (2, 34) 6
*
*
Buncombe County *** 4.3 (3.1, 5.8) 27 (8, 34) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Cabarrus County *** 4.2 (2.7, 6.3) 29 (5, 34) 5
*
*
Catawba County *** 4.3 (2.7, 6.5) 26 (5, 34) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.9)
Chatham County *** 6.7 (4.1, 10.8) 3 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Cleveland County *** 6.0 (3.6, 9.5) 11 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Craven County *** 5.1 (2.8, 8.6) 18 (1, 34) 3
*
*
Cumberland County *** 6.7 (5.0, 8.6) 5 (1, 24) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Davidson County *** 4.6 (3.1, 6.8) 23 (4, 34) 6
*
*
Durham County *** 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 15 (3, 32) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Forsyth County *** 4.8 (3.6, 6.2) 21 (6, 32) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Gaston County *** 4.2 (2.9, 6.0) 28 (7, 34) 7
*
*
Guilford County *** 4.4 (3.5, 5.6) 25 (10, 32) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Harnett County *** 5.6 (3.5, 8.7) 14 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Henderson County *** 2.9 (1.7, 5.0) 33 (18, 34) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Iredell County *** 3.1 (1.9, 5.0) 32 (14, 34) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Johnston County *** 2.9 (1.7, 4.7) 34 (17, 34) 3
*
*
Mecklenburg County *** 5.2 (4.3, 6.1) 16 (7, 28) 29 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 2.9)
Moore County *** 6.2 (4.0, 9.5) 9 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Nash County *** 6.6 (4.2, 10.2) 6 (1, 32) 5
*
*
New Hanover County *** 4.9 (3.5, 6.7) 20 (4, 33) 9
*
*
Onslow County *** 8.0 (5.5, 11.4) 2 (1, 26) 6
*
*
Orange County *** 5.9 (3.8, 8.7) 12 (1, 33) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Pitt County *** 4.7 (2.9, 7.0) 22 (3, 34) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Randolph County *** 3.5 (2.1, 5.7) 31 (9, 34) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.8)
Robeson County *** 6.7 (4.5, 9.7) 4 (1, 30) 6
*
*
Rockingham County *** 6.5 (4.1, 10.2) 7 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Rowan County *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.7) 17 (2, 34) 5
*
*
Surry County *** 6.1 (3.6, 10.1) 10 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Union County *** 3.9 (2.5, 5.8) 30 (8, 34) 5
*
*
Wake County *** 5.8 (4.9, 6.8) 13 (4, 24) 32 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.0)
Wayne County *** 6.3 (4.2, 9.2) 8 (1, 31) 6
*
*
Wilson County *** 9.2 (6.1, 13.6) 1 (1, 21) 6
*
*
Alexander County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lenoir County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rutherford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sampson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2021 9:32 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top