Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Ovary, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.8) N/A 394 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -2.1)
United States N/A *** 6.0 (6.0, 6.1) N/A 13,455 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Alamance County Urban *** 7.4 (5.4, 10.0) 6 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.3)
Beaufort County Rural *** 8.2 (4.3, 14.5) 4 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Brunswick County Urban *** 5.1 (3.5, 7.5) 30 (5, 41) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.1)
Buncombe County Urban *** 5.2 (3.9, 6.8) 27 (9, 40) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Burke County Urban *** 4.7 (2.7, 7.9) 35 (4, 41) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.6)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 3.5 (2.2, 5.3) 41 (20, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.5)
Caldwell County Urban *** 5.7 (3.1, 9.7) 23 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Catawba County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.6) 7 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Chatham County Urban *** 6.5 (4.0, 10.5) 13 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Cleveland County Rural *** 6.2 (3.8, 9.5) 20 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Craven County Rural *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.4) 21 (2, 41) 5
*
*
Cumberland County Urban *** 5.0 (3.6, 6.7) 31 (8, 41) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Davidson County Urban *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.8) 25 (3, 41) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.2)
Durham County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 37 (13, 41) 8 falling falling trend -7.1 (-26.6, -1.7)
Forsyth County Urban *** 5.7 (4.5, 7.2) 22 (5, 38) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-13.9, -1.7)
Gaston County Urban *** 5.0 (3.5, 6.9) 32 (7, 41) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.2, 24.4)
Guilford County Urban *** 6.4 (5.2, 7.7) 15 (4, 32) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Harnett County Rural *** 6.6 (4.3, 9.7) 12 (1, 40) 5
*
*
Haywood County Rural *** 6.3 (3.7, 10.6) 18 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Henderson County Urban *** 6.7 (4.9, 9.4) 10 (2, 37) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.1)
Iredell County Urban *** 5.6 (3.8, 7.9) 24 (3, 41) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Jackson County Rural *** 10.6 (5.9, 18.0) 1 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Johnston County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.4) 8 (1, 37) 9
*
*
Lincoln County Urban *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.7) 29 (2, 41) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.7)
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 5.2 (4.4, 6.1) 28 (14, 38) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Moore County Urban *** 4.1 (2.4, 7.0) 39 (7, 41) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Nash County Urban *** 4.6 (2.6, 7.7) 36 (5, 41) 3
*
*
New Hanover County Urban *** 6.7 (5.0, 8.9) 11 (2, 36) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)
Onslow County Urban *** 8.8 (6.0, 12.3) 2 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 3.3)
Orange County Urban *** 3.5 (2.0, 5.8) 40 (15, 41) 3 falling falling trend -10.8 (-41.8, -2.3)
Pitt County Urban *** 4.9 (3.1, 7.3) 33 (5, 41) 5
*
*
Randolph County Urban *** 6.4 (4.3, 9.2) 17 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.1)
Robeson County Rural *** 7.5 (5.0, 11.0) 5 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Rockingham County Urban *** 4.9 (2.6, 8.4) 34 (3, 41) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -1.0)
Rowan County Urban *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.8) 38 (8, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.4 (3.6, 10.9) 14 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Surry County Rural *** 6.3 (3.7, 10.2) 19 (1, 41) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.4)
Union County Urban *** 6.8 (5.0, 9.1) 9 (2, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 1.2)
Wake County Urban *** 5.3 (4.5, 6.2) 26 (11, 37) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.2)
Wayne County Urban *** 6.4 (4.2, 9.4) 16 (1, 40) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Wilkes County Rural *** 8.6 (5.1, 13.9) 3 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lenoir County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sampson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 11:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top