Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Prostate, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 19.7 (19.1, 20.3) N/A 957 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
United States *** 18.9 (18.8, 19.0) N/A 30,566 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Halifax County *** 34.9 (26.0, 46.1) 1 (1, 32) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Chowan County *** 31.7 (18.3, 53.1) 2 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Hoke County *** 29.2 (17.9, 44.2) 3 (1, 75) 5 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.3, -3.7)
Granville County *** 28.7 (20.3, 39.3) 4 (1, 64) 8 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.7)
Montgomery County *** 28.5 (17.9, 43.4) 5 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Hertford County *** 27.1 (16.0, 43.3) 6 (1, 77) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.4)
Robeson County *** 26.9 (20.8, 34.1) 7 (1, 54) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.9)
Sampson County *** 26.9 (19.4, 36.3) 8 (1, 67) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.4)
Anson County *** 26.7 (15.1, 43.7) 9 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Pasquotank County *** 26.6 (17.4, 39.1) 10 (1, 73) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Martin County *** 26.5 (16.3, 41.9) 11 (1, 76) 4 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.9, -2.6)
Pender County *** 25.9 (18.1, 35.8) 12 (1, 71) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.2)
Bladen County *** 24.8 (15.7, 37.7) 13 (1, 76) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.3)
Wayne County *** 24.8 (19.2, 31.4) 14 (2, 63) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.8, -2.4)
Harnett County *** 23.8 (17.7, 31.2) 15 (2, 68) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.2)
Warren County *** 23.8 (14.0, 39.3) 16 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Richmond County *** 23.5 (15.3, 34.5) 17 (1, 75) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.6, -1.8)
Rowan County *** 22.7 (18.0, 28.2) 18 (3, 66) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.7, -2.3)
Durham County *** 22.4 (18.6, 26.8) 19 (5, 61) 25 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.5)
Onslow County *** 22.4 (16.8, 28.9) 20 (3, 71) 12 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.6, -2.4)
Ashe County *** 22.3 (14.1, 34.7) 21 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.5)
Nash County *** 22.2 (16.5, 29.4) 22 (3, 73) 11 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.2, -2.3)
Macon County *** 21.8 (14.8, 31.8) 23 (2, 76) 6
*
*
Guilford County *** 21.7 (19.1, 24.6) 24 (9, 56) 52 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.7)
Orange County *** 21.7 (16.3, 28.2) 25 (4, 72) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.4, -2.7)
Burke County *** 21.6 (16.3, 28.1) 26 (4, 72) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Davie County *** 21.3 (14.4, 30.9) 27 (2, 76) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.0)
Iredell County *** 21.3 (16.8, 26.4) 28 (5, 69) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Union County *** 21.0 (16.5, 26.3) 29 (6, 70) 16 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.3, -3.1)
Yadkin County *** 20.9 (13.0, 31.9) 30 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Mecklenburg County *** 20.7 (18.6, 23.1) 31 (14, 58) 71 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -2.9)
Chatham County *** 20.6 (15.5, 27.2) 32 (5, 74) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Person County *** 20.5 (12.9, 31.2) 33 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Edgecombe County *** 20.4 (13.3, 30.0) 34 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.4)
Catawba County *** 20.4 (16.0, 25.5) 35 (6, 72) 16 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.8)
Wilson County *** 20.3 (14.5, 27.7) 36 (4, 76) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.4)
Alamance County *** 20.3 (16.2, 25.1) 37 (7, 71) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Rutherford County *** 20.2 (14.3, 27.9) 38 (3, 76) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Beaufort County *** 20.2 (13.5, 29.4) 39 (3, 77) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.4, -2.4)
Haywood County *** 19.8 (14.3, 27.1) 40 (5, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Wake County *** 19.8 (17.7, 22.1) 41 (17, 62) 69 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.9)
Cumberland County *** 19.8 (16.2, 23.9) 42 (10, 70) 22 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.8)
Vance County *** 19.7 (12.3, 30.0) 43 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.4, -2.9)
Davidson County *** 19.6 (15.5, 24.3) 44 (8, 73) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Rockingham County *** 19.6 (14.6, 25.8) 45 (6, 76) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.7, -2.2)
Lee County *** 19.4 (12.9, 28.1) 46 (3, 77) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.0)
Cherokee County *** 19.4 (12.3, 30.5) 47 (3, 77) 5
*
*
Johnston County *** 19.4 (14.8, 24.8) 48 (7, 75) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Pitt County *** 19.2 (14.6, 24.9) 49 (7, 75) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.7)
Cleveland County *** 18.8 (13.6, 25.2) 50 (7, 76) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -2.5)
Forsyth County *** 18.8 (16.0, 21.9) 51 (18, 70) 33 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.4)
Dare County *** 18.6 (11.3, 29.2) 52 (2, 77) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.0)
Jackson County *** 18.5 (11.6, 28.1) 53 (3, 77) 5
*
*
New Hanover County *** 18.5 (15.1, 22.4) 54 (16, 74) 22 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.6)
Caldwell County *** 18.2 (13.0, 24.9) 55 (8, 77) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.8)
Brunswick County *** 18.2 (14.4, 22.8) 56 (14, 75) 18 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.7)
Cabarrus County *** 18.1 (13.9, 23.0) 57 (12, 76) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Lenoir County *** 18.0 (12.0, 26.1) 58 (6, 77) 6 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.3, -3.4)
Scotland County *** 17.9 (10.0, 29.7) 59 (2, 77) 3 falling falling trend -6.4 (-8.5, -4.4)
Moore County *** 17.1 (13.4, 21.9) 60 (16, 76) 14 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.5)
Wilkes County *** 17.1 (12.0, 23.9) 61 (9, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Franklin County *** 16.8 (10.8, 24.8) 62 (6, 77) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.4, -2.4)
Stokes County *** 16.6 (10.7, 25.0) 63 (8, 77) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.0)
Henderson County *** 16.5 (13.0, 20.8) 64 (20, 77) 15 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.7)
Randolph County *** 16.3 (12.4, 21.1) 65 (19, 77) 12 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Buncombe County *** 16.1 (13.3, 19.3) 66 (29, 76) 24 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.8, -3.1)
Gaston County *** 15.9 (12.6, 19.9) 67 (25, 77) 17 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
Craven County *** 15.4 (11.2, 20.7) 68 (21, 77) 9 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.7, -2.8)
Stanly County *** 15.2 (9.8, 22.5) 69 (12, 77) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Watauga County *** 15.0 (9.2, 23.4) 70 (10, 77) 4
*
*
Carteret County *** 14.6 (10.3, 20.5) 71 (22, 77) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.6)
Surry County *** 14.5 (9.8, 20.9) 72 (18, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Lincoln County *** 14.0 (9.3, 20.2) 73 (20, 77) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.8, -2.6)
McDowell County *** 13.6 (7.9, 21.9) 74 (13, 77) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.6)
Columbus County *** 13.2 (7.9, 20.7) 75 (18, 77) 4 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.6)
Duplin County *** 12.8 (7.7, 19.9) 76 (20, 77) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.0, -4.1)
Transylvania County *** 12.5 (7.8, 20.4) 77 (28, 77) 4 falling falling trend -5.1 (-6.8, -3.3)
Alexander County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/22/2022 7:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alexander, Alleghany, Avery, Bertie, Camden, Caswell, Clay, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hyde, Jones, Madison, Mitchell, Northampton, Pamlico, Perquimans, Polk, Swain, Tyrrell, Washington, Yancey

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top