Death Rates Table
County![]() |
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina | No | 19.7 (19.1, 20.2) | N/A | 993 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.6) |
United States | No | 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) | N/A | 31,337 |
stable ![]() |
-0.5 (-0.9, 0.0) |
Mecklenburg County | No | 21.4 (19.2, 23.7) | 34 (12, 53) | 76 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-3.8, -2.8) |
Wake County | No | 19.8 (17.8, 22.0) | 39 (18, 60) | 72 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-3.9, -2.9) |
Guilford County | No | 20.3 (17.9, 23.1) | 37 (13, 60) | 50 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-3.9, -2.7) |
Forsyth County | No | 21.7 (18.7, 25.0) | 28 (8, 57) | 40 |
falling ![]() |
-2.7 (-3.5, -1.9) |
Durham County | No | 22.7 (18.9, 26.9) | 19 (5, 59) | 27 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-4.2, -2.5) |
New Hanover County | No | 20.3 (16.8, 24.3) | 38 (10, 67) | 25 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-4.0, -2.2) |
Cumberland County | No | 19.5 (16.0, 23.5) | 41 (11, 71) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.8 (-4.7, -2.9) |
Buncombe County | Yes | 14.7 (12.1, 17.7) | 71 (40, 79) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-4.7, -3.1) |
Brunswick County | No | 18.8 (15.2, 23.3) | 45 (11, 75) | 21 |
falling ![]() |
-3.5 (-4.5, -2.5) |
Davidson County | No | 22.6 (18.3, 27.6) | 21 (4, 64) | 20 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-3.6, -1.3) |
Iredell County | No | 21.6 (17.2, 26.7) | 29 (4, 69) | 18 |
falling ![]() |
-2.3 (-3.3, -1.3) |
Catawba County | No | 21.6 (17.2, 26.7) | 31 (5, 68) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
2.1 (-3.0, 7.5) |
Union County | No | 21.4 (17.0, 26.5) | 33 (5, 68) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
-0.9 (-3.6, 1.8) |
Gaston County | Yes | 15.7 (12.5, 19.5) | 67 (26, 79) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.3, -2.0) |
Henderson County | No | 17.7 (14.1, 22.2) | 52 (15, 77) | 17 |
stable ![]() |
15.4 (-8.0, 44.7) |
Johnston County | No | 21.5 (16.8, 26.9) | 32 (4, 71) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.3, -2.1) |
Alamance County | No | 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) | 46 (12, 75) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-4.3, -2.4) |
Rowan County | No | 21.6 (17.1, 27.0) | 30 (5, 70) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-3.6 (-4.7, -2.4) |
Wayne County | No | 25.1 (19.6, 31.6) | 13 (1, 59) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.5 (-4.6, -2.4) |
Robeson County | No | 25.9 (20.1, 32.9) | 11 (1, 57) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-4.0, -2.0) |
Cabarrus County | No | 17.5 (13.5, 22.2) | 53 (14, 78) | 14 |
falling ![]() |
-2.8 (-4.0, -1.6) |
Moore County | No | 17.0 (13.3, 21.7) | 58 (17, 78) | 14 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-4.5, -1.6) |
Orange County | No | 21.9 (16.7, 28.2) | 26 (3, 73) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-5.3, -2.8) |
Chatham County | No | 22.0 (16.9, 28.5) | 25 (3, 72) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-4.3, -1.7) |
Harnett County | No | 23.8 (17.9, 30.8) | 17 (1, 69) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-4.4, -2.1) |
Randolph County | Yes | 15.7 (11.9, 20.3) | 66 (26, 79) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-4.6, -2.1) |
Onslow County | No | 22.2 (16.8, 28.6) | 23 (3, 73) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-5.7, -2.6) |
Pitt County | No | 17.0 (12.8, 22.0) | 59 (14, 78) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-5.4, -2.8) |
Nash County | No | 22.4 (16.7, 29.4) | 22 (2, 73) | 11 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.0, -2.4) |
Craven County | No | 16.9 (12.6, 22.4) | 60 (13, 79) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.3, -2.6) |
Burke County | No | 18.2 (13.5, 24.2) | 48 (9, 78) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-2.4 (-3.9, -0.9) |
Rockingham County | No | 17.3 (12.7, 23.1) | 54 (12, 79) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.4, -2.1) |
Halifax County | No | 28.9 (21.0, 39.1) | 3 (1, 62) | 9 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-3.7, -1.3) |
Haywood County | No | 19.5 (14.1, 26.7) | 42 (5, 77) | 9 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-3.0, -0.2) |
Caldwell County | No | 17.1 (12.2, 23.4) | 57 (11, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-4.8, -2.9) |
Wilkes County | No | 18.9 (13.6, 25.9) | 44 (6, 78) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-3.1, -0.8) |
Carteret County | Yes | 14.8 (10.5, 20.6) | 70 (24, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.2, -2.5) |
Cleveland County | Yes | 16.8 (11.9, 23.0) | 61 (12, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.2, -2.7) |
Granville County | No | 27.8 (19.7, 38.2) | 8 (1, 65) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-5.1, -1.7) |
Rutherford County | No | 20.7 (14.8, 28.5) | 35 (3, 77) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.4 (-3.7, -1.2) |
Edgecombe County | No | 29.0 (20.5, 39.9) | 2 (1, 67) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.8 (-4.4, -1.2) |
Sampson County | No | 24.1 (17.0, 33.2) | 16 (1, 74) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.2, -1.5) |
Wilson County | No | 17.9 (12.6, 24.8) | 50 (6, 79) | 8 |
stable ![]() |
-1.7 (-32.0, 42.2) |
Lincoln County | Yes | 16.1 (11.2, 22.4) | 65 (14, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.3, -2.4) |
Surry County | No | 17.7 (12.5, 24.6) | 51 (9, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-4.1, -0.9) |
Macon County | No | 24.9 (17.3, 35.5) | 14 (1, 75) | 7 |
|
|
Pender County | No | 21.8 (14.9, 30.7) | 27 (1, 77) | 7 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-6.0, -2.3) |
Beaufort County | No | 17.3 (11.5, 25.4) | 55 (7, 79) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.4, -2.5) |
Pasquotank County | No | 28.7 (19.2, 41.4) | 4 (1, 72) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-3.6, -0.4) |
Franklin County | No | 17.1 (11.2, 24.9) | 56 (7, 79) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-4.4 (-6.3, -2.5) |
Davie County | No | 18.1 (11.8, 26.9) | 49 (5, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.7, -2.2) |
Lenoir County | Yes | 16.7 (10.9, 24.5) | 62 (7, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.6 (-5.9, -3.2) |
Bladen County | No | 25.8 (16.6, 38.6) | 12 (1, 76) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.4 (-6.2, -2.5) |
Dare County | No | 22.0 (14.1, 33.1) | 24 (1, 79) | 5 |
stable ![]() |
-2.1 (-4.5, 0.4) |
Stokes County | Yes | 16.5 (10.6, 24.8) | 64 (7, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.6, -2.2) |
Transylvania County | Yes | 14.4 (9.4, 22.5) | 73 (16, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-5.0 (-6.5, -3.3) |
Vance County | No | 22.6 (14.4, 33.7) | 20 (1, 78) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.5 (-6.1, -2.9) |
Stanly County | Yes | 14.3 (9.1, 21.4) | 74 (15, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.6, -1.7) |
Duplin County | Yes | 14.1 (9.0, 21.3) | 75 (17, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-5.6 (-6.9, -4.3) |
Columbus County | Yes | 15.3 (9.6, 23.3) | 69 (10, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.6, -2.3) |
Martin County | No | 28.2 (17.6, 44.0) | 7 (1, 77) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.8 (-6.9, -2.7) |
Montgomery County | No | 24.7 (15.4, 38.3) | 15 (1, 78) | 5 |
|
|
Richmond County | No | 18.9 (11.9, 28.8) | 43 (2, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.8, -2.2) |
Cherokee County | Yes | 16.6 (10.3, 26.9) | 63 (6, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Hertford County | No | 31.6 (19.5, 48.9) | 1 (1, 75) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-5.0, -1.5) |
Lee County | Yes | 14.4 (8.9, 22.0) | 72 (13, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.2, -2.2) |
Person County | No | 18.3 (11.1, 28.6) | 47 (3, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.8, -0.3) |
Hoke County | No | 27.2 (16.0, 42.4) | 9 (1, 78) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-5.8 (-7.9, -3.6) |
Yadkin County | No | 19.6 (12.1, 30.4) | 40 (2, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Caswell County | No | 26.8 (16.1, 42.8) | 10 (1, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-5.9, -0.7) |
Jackson County | Yes | 15.5 (9.3, 24.5) | 68 (7, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Watauga County | Yes | 12.9 (7.6, 20.7) | 78 (19, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Yancey County | No | 28.4 (16.9, 46.1) | 6 (1, 77) | 4 |
|
|
Warren County | No | 22.8 (13.4, 37.9) | 18 (1, 79) | 4 |
|
|
McDowell County | Yes | 11.6 (6.7, 19.1) | 79 (27, 79) | 3 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-5.1, -1.0) |
Alexander County | Yes | 13.8 (7.7, 23.0) | 76 (10, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Ashe County | Yes | 13.5 (7.5, 23.7) | 77 (13, 79) | 3 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-5.0, -0.7) |
Chowan County | No | 28.5 (16.2, 49.0) | 5 (1, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Northampton County | No | 20.5 (11.6, 35.3) | 36 (1, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Alleghany County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Anson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Avery County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bertie County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Currituck County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Greene County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Scotland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Swain County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2023 10:24 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2023 10:24 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.