Death Rates Table
County![]() |
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina | No | 19.7 (19.1, 20.2) | N/A | 993 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.6) |
United States | No | 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) | N/A | 31,337 |
stable ![]() |
-0.5 (-0.9, 0.0) |
Hertford County | No | 31.6 (19.5, 48.9) | 1 (1, 75) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-5.0, -1.5) |
Edgecombe County | No | 29.0 (20.5, 39.9) | 2 (1, 67) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.8 (-4.4, -1.2) |
Halifax County | No | 28.9 (21.0, 39.1) | 3 (1, 62) | 9 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-3.7, -1.3) |
Pasquotank County | No | 28.7 (19.2, 41.4) | 4 (1, 72) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-3.6, -0.4) |
Chowan County | No | 28.5 (16.2, 49.0) | 5 (1, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Yancey County | No | 28.4 (16.9, 46.1) | 6 (1, 77) | 4 |
|
|
Martin County | No | 28.2 (17.6, 44.0) | 7 (1, 77) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.8 (-6.9, -2.7) |
Granville County | No | 27.8 (19.7, 38.2) | 8 (1, 65) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-5.1, -1.7) |
Hoke County | No | 27.2 (16.0, 42.4) | 9 (1, 78) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-5.8 (-7.9, -3.6) |
Caswell County | No | 26.8 (16.1, 42.8) | 10 (1, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-5.9, -0.7) |
Robeson County | No | 25.9 (20.1, 32.9) | 11 (1, 57) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-4.0, -2.0) |
Bladen County | No | 25.8 (16.6, 38.6) | 12 (1, 76) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.4 (-6.2, -2.5) |
Wayne County | No | 25.1 (19.6, 31.6) | 13 (1, 59) | 15 |
falling ![]() |
-3.5 (-4.6, -2.4) |
Macon County | No | 24.9 (17.3, 35.5) | 14 (1, 75) | 7 |
|
|
Montgomery County | No | 24.7 (15.4, 38.3) | 15 (1, 78) | 5 |
|
|
Sampson County | No | 24.1 (17.0, 33.2) | 16 (1, 74) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-4.2, -1.5) |
Harnett County | No | 23.8 (17.9, 30.8) | 17 (1, 69) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-4.4, -2.1) |
Warren County | No | 22.8 (13.4, 37.9) | 18 (1, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Durham County | No | 22.7 (18.9, 26.9) | 19 (5, 59) | 27 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-4.2, -2.5) |
Vance County | No | 22.6 (14.4, 33.7) | 20 (1, 78) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.5 (-6.1, -2.9) |
Davidson County | No | 22.6 (18.3, 27.6) | 21 (4, 64) | 20 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-3.6, -1.3) |
Nash County | No | 22.4 (16.7, 29.4) | 22 (2, 73) | 11 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.0, -2.4) |
Onslow County | No | 22.2 (16.8, 28.6) | 23 (3, 73) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-5.7, -2.6) |
Dare County | No | 22.0 (14.1, 33.1) | 24 (1, 79) | 5 |
stable ![]() |
-2.1 (-4.5, 0.4) |
Chatham County | No | 22.0 (16.9, 28.5) | 25 (3, 72) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-3.0 (-4.3, -1.7) |
Orange County | No | 21.9 (16.7, 28.2) | 26 (3, 73) | 13 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-5.3, -2.8) |
Pender County | No | 21.8 (14.9, 30.7) | 27 (1, 77) | 7 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-6.0, -2.3) |
Forsyth County | No | 21.7 (18.7, 25.0) | 28 (8, 57) | 40 |
falling ![]() |
-2.7 (-3.5, -1.9) |
Iredell County | No | 21.6 (17.2, 26.7) | 29 (4, 69) | 18 |
falling ![]() |
-2.3 (-3.3, -1.3) |
Rowan County | No | 21.6 (17.1, 27.0) | 30 (5, 70) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-3.6 (-4.7, -2.4) |
Catawba County | No | 21.6 (17.2, 26.7) | 31 (5, 68) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
2.1 (-3.0, 7.5) |
Johnston County | No | 21.5 (16.8, 26.9) | 32 (4, 71) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.3, -2.1) |
Union County | No | 21.4 (17.0, 26.5) | 33 (5, 68) | 18 |
stable ![]() |
-0.9 (-3.6, 1.8) |
Mecklenburg County | No | 21.4 (19.2, 23.7) | 34 (12, 53) | 76 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-3.8, -2.8) |
Rutherford County | No | 20.7 (14.8, 28.5) | 35 (3, 77) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.4 (-3.7, -1.2) |
Northampton County | No | 20.5 (11.6, 35.3) | 36 (1, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Guilford County | No | 20.3 (17.9, 23.1) | 37 (13, 60) | 50 |
falling ![]() |
-3.3 (-3.9, -2.7) |
New Hanover County | No | 20.3 (16.8, 24.3) | 38 (10, 67) | 25 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-4.0, -2.2) |
Wake County | No | 19.8 (17.8, 22.0) | 39 (18, 60) | 72 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-3.9, -2.9) |
Yadkin County | No | 19.6 (12.1, 30.4) | 40 (2, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Cumberland County | No | 19.5 (16.0, 23.5) | 41 (11, 71) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.8 (-4.7, -2.9) |
Haywood County | No | 19.5 (14.1, 26.7) | 42 (5, 77) | 9 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-3.0, -0.2) |
Richmond County | No | 18.9 (11.9, 28.8) | 43 (2, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.8, -2.2) |
Wilkes County | No | 18.9 (13.6, 25.9) | 44 (6, 78) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-3.1, -0.8) |
Brunswick County | No | 18.8 (15.2, 23.3) | 45 (11, 75) | 21 |
falling ![]() |
-3.5 (-4.5, -2.5) |
Alamance County | No | 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) | 46 (12, 75) | 16 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-4.3, -2.4) |
Person County | No | 18.3 (11.1, 28.6) | 47 (3, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-4.8, -0.3) |
Burke County | No | 18.2 (13.5, 24.2) | 48 (9, 78) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-2.4 (-3.9, -0.9) |
Davie County | No | 18.1 (11.8, 26.9) | 49 (5, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.7, -2.2) |
Wilson County | No | 17.9 (12.6, 24.8) | 50 (6, 79) | 8 |
stable ![]() |
-1.7 (-32.0, 42.2) |
Surry County | No | 17.7 (12.5, 24.6) | 51 (9, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-2.5 (-4.1, -0.9) |
Henderson County | No | 17.7 (14.1, 22.2) | 52 (15, 77) | 17 |
stable ![]() |
15.4 (-8.0, 44.7) |
Cabarrus County | No | 17.5 (13.5, 22.2) | 53 (14, 78) | 14 |
falling ![]() |
-2.8 (-4.0, -1.6) |
Rockingham County | No | 17.3 (12.7, 23.1) | 54 (12, 79) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.4, -2.1) |
Beaufort County | No | 17.3 (11.5, 25.4) | 55 (7, 79) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.4, -2.5) |
Franklin County | No | 17.1 (11.2, 24.9) | 56 (7, 79) | 6 |
falling ![]() |
-4.4 (-6.3, -2.5) |
Caldwell County | No | 17.1 (12.2, 23.4) | 57 (11, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-4.8, -2.9) |
Moore County | No | 17.0 (13.3, 21.7) | 58 (17, 78) | 14 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-4.5, -1.6) |
Pitt County | No | 17.0 (12.8, 22.0) | 59 (14, 78) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-4.1 (-5.4, -2.8) |
Craven County | No | 16.9 (12.6, 22.4) | 60 (13, 79) | 10 |
falling ![]() |
-4.0 (-5.3, -2.6) |
Cleveland County | Yes | 16.8 (11.9, 23.0) | 61 (12, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.2, -2.7) |
Lenoir County | Yes | 16.7 (10.9, 24.5) | 62 (7, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-4.6 (-5.9, -3.2) |
Cherokee County | Yes | 16.6 (10.3, 26.9) | 63 (6, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Stokes County | Yes | 16.5 (10.6, 24.8) | 64 (7, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.6, -2.2) |
Lincoln County | Yes | 16.1 (11.2, 22.4) | 65 (14, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.3, -2.4) |
Randolph County | Yes | 15.7 (11.9, 20.3) | 66 (26, 79) | 12 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-4.6, -2.1) |
Gaston County | Yes | 15.7 (12.5, 19.5) | 67 (26, 79) | 17 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.3, -2.0) |
Jackson County | Yes | 15.5 (9.3, 24.5) | 68 (7, 79) | 4 |
|
|
Columbus County | Yes | 15.3 (9.6, 23.3) | 69 (10, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.6, -2.3) |
Carteret County | Yes | 14.8 (10.5, 20.6) | 70 (24, 79) | 8 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-5.2, -2.5) |
Buncombe County | Yes | 14.7 (12.1, 17.7) | 71 (40, 79) | 23 |
falling ![]() |
-3.9 (-4.7, -3.1) |
Lee County | Yes | 14.4 (8.9, 22.0) | 72 (13, 79) | 4 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.2, -2.2) |
Transylvania County | Yes | 14.4 (9.4, 22.5) | 73 (16, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-5.0 (-6.5, -3.3) |
Stanly County | Yes | 14.3 (9.1, 21.4) | 74 (15, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-3.7 (-5.6, -1.7) |
Duplin County | Yes | 14.1 (9.0, 21.3) | 75 (17, 79) | 5 |
falling ![]() |
-5.6 (-6.9, -4.3) |
Alexander County | Yes | 13.8 (7.7, 23.0) | 76 (10, 79) | 3 |
|
|
Ashe County | Yes | 13.5 (7.5, 23.7) | 77 (13, 79) | 3 |
falling ![]() |
-2.9 (-5.0, -0.7) |
Watauga County | Yes | 12.9 (7.6, 20.7) | 78 (19, 79) | 4 |
|
|
McDowell County | Yes | 11.6 (6.7, 19.1) | 79 (27, 79) | 3 |
falling ![]() |
-3.1 (-5.1, -1.0) |
Alleghany County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Anson County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Avery County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bertie County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Currituck County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Greene County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Scotland County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Swain County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/28/2023 8:32 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/28/2023 8:32 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.