Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Bladder, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate†
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina *** 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) N/A 500 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.6)
United States *** 4.2 (4.2, 4.3) N/A 16,599 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Robeson County *** 2.6 (1.6, 4.1) 53 (24, 53) 4
*
*
Orange County *** 2.7 (1.6, 4.2) 52 (22, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.6)
Durham County *** 2.9 (2.1, 3.9) 51 (27, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Union County *** 3.2 (2.2, 4.5) 50 (15, 53) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Chatham County *** 3.2 (2.0, 5.2) 49 (8, 53) 4
*
*
Buncombe County *** 3.3 (2.5, 4.3) 48 (20, 53) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Mecklenburg County *** 3.4 (2.8, 4.0) 47 (27, 52) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Pitt County *** 3.4 (2.3, 4.9) 46 (10, 53) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Cumberland County *** 3.6 (2.7, 4.7) 45 (13, 53) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Henderson County *** 3.8 (2.8, 5.3) 44 (9, 53) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Nash County *** 3.9 (2.5, 5.9) 43 (4, 53) 5
*
*
Wake County *** 3.9 (3.3, 4.6) 42 (17, 49) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Haywood County *** 3.9 (2.4, 6.4) 41 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Catawba County *** 4.0 (2.8, 5.4) 40 (7, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Brunswick County *** 4.0 (2.9, 5.5) 39 (6, 53) 9
*
*
Guilford County *** 4.0 (3.3, 4.8) 38 (14, 50) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Harnett County *** 4.0 (2.5, 6.0) 37 (3, 53) 5
*
*
New Hanover County *** 4.1 (3.1, 5.3) 36 (7, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Edgecombe County *** 4.1 (2.3, 7.0) 35 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Carteret County *** 4.1 (2.6, 6.4) 34 (3, 53) 5
*
*
Beaufort County *** 4.1 (2.3, 7.1) 33 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Caldwell County *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.4) 32 (2, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Lincoln County *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.5) 31 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Johnston County *** 4.2 (3.0, 5.8) 30 (4, 52) 8
*
*
Randolph County *** 4.3 (3.1, 5.9) 29 (4, 52) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Wayne County *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.1) 28 (2, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Rowan County *** 4.3 (3.0, 5.9) 27 (4, 52) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Iredell County *** 4.4 (3.1, 5.9) 26 (3, 52) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Forsyth County *** 4.4 (3.6, 5.4) 25 (6, 47) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Craven County *** 4.6 (3.1, 6.5) 24 (2, 52) 7
*
*
Rutherford County *** 4.6 (2.9, 7.1) 23 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1)
Moore County *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.4) 22 (2, 52) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Stanly County *** 4.7 (2.9, 7.4) 21 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Davidson County *** 4.8 (3.5, 6.3) 20 (2, 50) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Franklin County *** 4.8 (2.8, 7.7) 19 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Lenoir County *** 4.8 (2.9, 7.7) 18 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Cleveland County *** 4.9 (3.3, 7.1) 17 (1, 52) 6
*
*
Wilkes County *** 5.0 (3.3, 7.5) 16 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Wilson County *** 5.0 (3.3, 7.4) 15 (1, 52) 6
*
*
Cabarrus County *** 5.1 (3.8, 6.7) 14 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Transylvania County *** 5.2 (3.1, 8.8) 13 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Granville County *** 5.3 (3.2, 8.4) 12 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Halifax County *** 5.4 (3.3, 8.5) 11 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Rockingham County *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 10 (1, 48) 7
*
*
Surry County *** 5.5 (3.6, 8.0) 9 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Alamance County *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.2) 8 (1, 42) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Gaston County *** 5.5 (4.3, 7.0) 7 (1, 40) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.6)
Sampson County *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.6) 6 (1, 51) 5
*
*
McDowell County *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.3) 5 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Burke County *** 5.8 (4.1, 8.2) 4 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.0)
Onslow County *** 6.0 (4.3, 8.2) 3 (1, 45) 8
*
*
Vance County *** 6.2 (3.5, 10.3) 2 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Cherokee County *** 7.5 (4.2, 13.0) 1 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Alexander County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/28/2022 4:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Bertie, Bladen, Camden, Caswell, Chowan, Clay, Columbus, Currituck, Dare, Davie, Duplin, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Lee, Macon, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Person, Polk, Richmond, Scotland, Stokes, Swain, Tyrrell, Warren, Washington, Watauga, Yadkin, Yancey

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top