Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 6.0 (5.8, 6.2) N/A 754 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Yancey County Rural *** 8.7 (4.9, 15.3) 3 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Yadkin County Urban *** 8.3 (5.0, 13.1) 5 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Wilson County Rural *** 4.5 (2.9, 6.9) 60 (13, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Wilkes County Rural *** 7.1 (5.0, 10.0) 15 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.6)
Wayne County Urban *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 37 (3, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.8)
Watauga County Rural *** 6.2 (3.5, 10.2) 41 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Wake County Urban *** 5.4 (4.7, 6.1) 53 (28, 60) 55 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.9, -1.6)
Union County Urban *** 6.2 (4.9, 7.9) 35 (5, 61) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.5)
Transylvania County Rural *** 5.5 (3.3, 9.4) 50 (3, 64) 4
*
*
Surry County Rural *** 7.6 (5.3, 10.6) 11 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Stokes County Urban *** 6.8 (4.2, 10.7) 22 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Stanly County Rural *** 6.7 (4.5, 9.8) 25 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Sampson County Rural *** 8.9 (6.0, 12.7) 2 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 4.0)
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.8 (4.5, 9.9) 23 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Rowan County Urban *** 7.6 (5.9, 9.7) 10 (1, 54) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Rockingham County Urban *** 8.0 (5.9, 10.7) 7 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Robeson County Rural *** 5.8 (4.1, 7.9) 45 (5, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Richmond County Rural *** 7.1 (4.3, 11.2) 16 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Randolph County Urban *** 6.4 (4.8, 8.3) 32 (4, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.7)
Pitt County Urban *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.0) 42 (4, 63) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.5)
Person County Urban *** 7.3 (4.3, 11.8) 12 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Pender County Urban *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.6) 14 (1, 63) 6
*
*
Orange County Urban *** 4.0 (2.7, 5.8) 63 (31, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.3)
Onslow County Urban *** 7.0 (5.1, 9.2) 19 (2, 60) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.8)
New Hanover County Urban *** 6.5 (5.2, 8.0) 29 (6, 57) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Nash County Urban *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.3) 62 (21, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Moore County Urban *** 5.6 (4.0, 7.7) 48 (6, 64) 9
*
*
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 5.5 (4.8, 6.2) 51 (25, 59) 54 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Lincoln County Urban *** 6.9 (4.8, 9.6) 21 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.5)
Lenoir County Rural *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.8) 13 (1, 63) 6
*
*
Lee County Rural *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.3) 61 (7, 64) 3
*
*
Johnston County Urban *** 4.9 (3.6, 6.5) 57 (18, 64) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.2) 20 (1, 64) 4 falling falling trend -5.8 (-26.2, -1.6)
Iredell County Urban *** 6.6 (5.2, 8.4) 26 (3, 59) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Henderson County Urban *** 6.6 (5.1, 8.6) 27 (4, 60) 14 rising rising trend 25.9 (2.1, 41.3)
Haywood County Rural *** 6.3 (4.1, 9.3) 33 (2, 64) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.3)
Harnett County Rural *** 5.5 (3.9, 7.6) 49 (7, 64) 8 stable stable trend 17.4 (-2.4, 34.5)
Halifax County Rural *** 8.1 (5.3, 12.2) 6 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.5)
Guilford County Urban *** 6.2 (5.4, 7.2) 36 (11, 55) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Granville County Rural *** 4.8 (2.8, 7.7) 59 (6, 64) 4
*
*
Gaston County Urban *** 6.4 (5.2, 8.0) 31 (5, 58) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Franklin County Urban *** 10.4 (7.4, 14.2) 1 (1, 42) 8 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.1, 4.0)
Forsyth County Urban *** 6.2 (5.2, 7.3) 38 (10, 57) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Edgecombe County Urban *** 4.8 (2.9, 7.9) 58 (5, 64) 4
*
*
Durham County Urban *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.2) 56 (23, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Duplin County Rural *** 5.2 (3.0, 8.4) 55 (3, 64) 4
*
*
Davie County Urban *** 6.5 (3.9, 10.3) 30 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Davidson County Urban *** 7.1 (5.6, 8.9) 17 (2, 56) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.7)
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.2 (5.0, 7.6) 39 (7, 59) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Craven County Rural *** 5.7 (4.1, 7.8) 46 (6, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Columbus County Rural *** 5.6 (3.6, 8.7) 47 (3, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Cleveland County Rural *** 6.2 (4.4, 8.7) 34 (3, 63) 8 falling falling trend -29.3 (-52.0, -0.9)
Cherokee County Rural *** 8.4 (4.9, 14.0) 4 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Chatham County Urban *** 5.9 (4.2, 8.3) 43 (4, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 1.2)
Catawba County Urban *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.1) 52 (10, 64) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2)
Carteret County Rural *** 7.7 (5.5, 10.6) 9 (1, 59) 9
*
*
Caldwell County Urban *** 3.9 (2.4, 6.0) 64 (23, 64) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.3)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 5.9 (4.5, 7.5) 44 (8, 63) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)
Burke County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.7) 18 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 2.0)
Buncombe County Urban *** 6.2 (5.1, 7.4) 40 (9, 59) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 5.5)
Brunswick County Urban *** 6.7 (5.2, 8.6) 24 (3, 58) 17
*
*
Beaufort County Rural *** 5.3 (2.9, 9.1) 54 (2, 64) 3
*
*
Ashe County Rural *** 7.7 (4.7, 12.8) 8 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Alamance County Urban *** 6.6 (5.1, 8.4) 28 (3, 59) 14 stable stable trend 13.0 (-0.6, 24.1)
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/19/2024 8:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top