Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota No 142.0 (138.4, 145.6) N/A 1,295 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Rolette County No 202.1 (168.7, 240.0) 1 (1, 18) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Sioux County No 174.3 (112.7, 255.4) 2 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Grand Forks County No 168.1 (154.4, 182.6) 3 (2, 23) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Wells County No 167.7 (125.5, 223.1) 4 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Adams County No 163.7 (110.2, 240.9) 5 (1, 47) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Williams County No 162.1 (141.2, 185.1) 6 (2, 34) 47 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Eddy County No 161.7 (110.9, 234.7) 7 (1, 47) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
McHenry County No 161.2 (123.8, 207.7) 8 (1, 44) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Nelson County No 159.2 (117.3, 218.2) 9 (1, 45) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Mercer County No 158.2 (126.8, 195.8) 10 (1, 42) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Burke County No 158.0 (102.6, 237.9) 11 (1, 48) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Barnes County No 157.8 (131.6, 188.6) 12 (1, 40) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Traill County No 157.7 (126.7, 194.9) 13 (1, 42) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Walsh County No 156.6 (130.7, 186.9) 14 (2, 40) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.3)
Dickey County No 156.5 (120.4, 202.2) 15 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Cavalier County No 156.0 (112.9, 213.2) 16 (1, 46) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Morton County No 154.2 (136.9, 173.1) 17 (3, 36) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Hettinger County No 154.0 (104.7, 223.4) 18 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Benson County No 149.4 (110.6, 197.6) 19 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Divide County No 148.4 (96.8, 223.7) 20 (1, 48) 6 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.8, 10.5)
Ramsey County No 148.0 (122.9, 177.4) 21 (2, 43) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Bottineau County No 146.3 (114.2, 186.2) 22 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Renville County No 144.2 (96.5, 213.0) 23 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.7)
Pembina County No 143.4 (115.1, 178.5) 24 (2, 45) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
McLean County No 142.9 (116.1, 175.0) 25 (3, 45) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Richland County No 141.6 (119.4, 167.1) 26 (4, 43) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Sargent County No 141.3 (102.4, 192.9) 27 (1, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
McIntosh County No 139.8 (91.6, 210.9) 28 (1, 48) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Stutsman County No 139.4 (120.6, 160.5) 29 (7, 43) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Ransom County No 138.4 (102.5, 184.5) 30 (2, 48) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Cass County No 138.1 (130.1, 146.4) 31 (16, 38) 238 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Bowman County No 137.8 (95.9, 195.8) 32 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Stark County No 136.4 (118.8, 155.7) 33 (10, 43) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Mountrail County No 134.5 (102.1, 173.6) 34 (3, 47) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Ward County No 132.0 (119.9, 145.0) 35 (16, 43) 91 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Burleigh County No 129.7 (120.5, 139.4) 36 (20, 43) 156 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Foster County No 128.9 (89.6, 183.6) 37 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Towner County Yes 120.6 (78.2, 187.2) 38 (2, 48) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Pierce County Yes 120.4 (87.8, 164.8) 39 (5, 48) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Dunn County Yes 119.7 (79.6, 173.4) 40 (3, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Logan County Yes 116.8 (69.7, 192.7) 41 (1, 48) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Kidder County Yes 116.4 (71.9, 183.3) 42 (2, 48) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
McKenzie County Yes 116.4 (87.1, 151.7) 43 (9, 48) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Grant County Yes 105.0 (67.6, 165.3) 44 (7, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Emmons County Yes 104.5 (71.6, 153.5) 45 (11, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
LaMoure County Yes 103.7 (68.8, 152.6) 46 (10, 48) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Steele County Yes 100.0 (59.0, 168.5) 47 (6, 48) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Griggs County Yes 99.6 (62.1, 161.5) 48 (7, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Billings County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 4:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top