Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend ascending
North Dakota N/A Yes 119.3 (114.9, 123.9) N/A 597 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
LaMoure County Rural No 131.0 (72.2, 222.0) 14 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Traill County Rural Yes 117.2 (80.9, 166.9) 23 (3, 33) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Cass County Urban Yes 114.4 (104.8, 124.7) 24 (12, 29) 111 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Sargent County Rural No 147.3 (92.3, 231.4) 7 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.8)
Cavalier County Rural No 167.9 (105.3, 261.7) 3 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.0)
Mountrail County Rural No 154.4 (106.2, 216.9) 4 (1, 31) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.4)
Barnes County Rural No 125.5 (95.1, 165.2) 18 (3, 32) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Rolette County Rural No 221.3 (172.4, 280.1) 1 (1, 8) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Dickey County Rural No 141.5 (95.2, 207.8) 8 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Morton County Urban No 133.7 (112.1, 158.6) 13 (4, 27) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.6)
Mercer County Rural No 138.0 (98.2, 191.0) 10 (2, 32) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Stark County Rural Yes 118.1 (96.4, 143.3) 22 (6, 31) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Burleigh County Urban Yes 113.3 (101.9, 125.7) 25 (12, 29) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Hettinger County Rural No 150.1 (82.8, 260.2) 6 (1, 33) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.0)
McHenry County Urban No 137.7 (92.8, 202.5) 11 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Stutsman County Rural Yes 119.0 (96.0, 146.8) 19 (5, 31) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Ward County Urban Yes 112.3 (97.7, 128.7) 26 (10, 30) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Wells County Rural Yes 118.5 (68.0, 199.5) 20 (1, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.6)
Grand Forks County Urban No 129.3 (113.3, 147.0) 16 (5, 26) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Walsh County Rural No 136.4 (101.9, 180.7) 12 (2, 31) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Pierce County Rural Yes 106.5 (64.8, 174.8) 27 (3, 33) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Bottineau County Rural Yes 79.1 (49.6, 125.3) 32 (12, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.6)
McLean County Rural Yes 85.6 (56.9, 125.9) 31 (11, 33) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Pembina County Rural No 152.8 (107.3, 215.0) 5 (1, 30) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.1)
Richland County Rural Yes 94.4 (70.2, 125.2) 30 (11, 33) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Ramsey County Rural Yes 101.4 (74.8, 136.5) 28 (7, 33) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Ransom County Rural Yes 77.3 (45.2, 129.1) 33 (11, 33) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.7)
Nelson County Rural Yes 100.6 (57.5, 182.2) 29 (3, 33) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -1.2)
Williams County Rural Yes 118.4 (95.1, 145.6) 21 (6, 31) 19 falling falling trend -13.0 (-25.4, -0.4)
Benson County Rural No 172.8 (113.3, 253.8) 2 (1, 30) 6
*
*
Foster County Rural No 129.3 (79.9, 209.0) 15 (1, 33) 5
*
*
McIntosh County Rural No 140.5 (69.0, 266.4) 9 (1, 33) 5
*
*
McKenzie County Rural No 128.3 (87.7, 180.3) 17 (2, 33) 7
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eddy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmons County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kidder County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 12:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top