Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota *** 144.9 (141.2, 148.8) N/A 1,221 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States 6 *** 160.2 (160.0, 160.4) N/A 465,913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Mercer County *** 196.6 (160.4, 239.3) 1 (1, 26) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Burke County *** 196.3 (133.2, 284.1) 2 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Nelson County *** 179.1 (135.3, 240.7) 3 (1, 42) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Bottineau County *** 177.9 (141.9, 221.9) 4 (1, 39) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Walsh County *** 177.5 (148.2, 212.0) 5 (1, 33) 30 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.1, 9.0)
Adams County *** 174.7 (120.7, 252.6) 6 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Dickey County *** 174.4 (136.1, 222.7) 7 (1, 41) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Williams County *** 172.5 (149.8, 197.6) 8 (1, 29) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Wells County *** 171.6 (132.6, 222.9) 9 (1, 42) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Grand Forks County *** 166.5 (152.3, 181.8) 10 (3, 26) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Eddy County *** 165.0 (109.3, 245.8) 11 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Renville County *** 163.6 (109.8, 239.1) 12 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.3)
Richland County *** 161.0 (136.8, 188.6) 13 (2, 38) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Traill County *** 160.5 (127.8, 200.1) 14 (1, 42) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
McHenry County *** 159.5 (122.3, 205.7) 15 (1, 44) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Stutsman County *** 158.5 (137.8, 181.8) 16 (3, 37) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Morton County *** 157.8 (139.6, 177.8) 17 (4, 35) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bowman County *** 157.3 (110.4, 221.5) 18 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Ransom County *** 154.5 (116.3, 202.9) 19 (1, 46) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Sargent County *** 153.7 (110.5, 211.2) 20 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Dunn County *** 153.7 (103.7, 220.2) 21 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Benson County *** 153.2 (105.9, 219.4) 22 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Barnes County *** 148.2 (121.6, 179.7) 23 (3, 44) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Pembina County *** 146.1 (115.4, 184.3) 24 (2, 46) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Logan County *** 144.6 (94.5, 222.4) 25 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
McLean County *** 144.5 (116.3, 178.6) 26 (4, 46) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Cass County *** 140.3 (131.9, 149.1) 27 (17, 39) 220 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Golden Valley County *** 139.6 (78.5, 234.4) 28 (1, 48) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Ramsey County *** 138.0 (113.7, 167.1) 29 (7, 45) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Cavalier County *** 137.7 (98.9, 190.7) 30 (2, 48) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Stark County *** 134.7 (117.0, 154.4) 31 (13, 44) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Ward County *** 133.9 (121.3, 147.3) 32 (18, 43) 87 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Pierce County *** 133.7 (97.7, 182.2) 33 (3, 48) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Griggs County *** 133.4 (84.7, 208.1) 34 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Burleigh County *** 131.8 (122.0, 142.1) 35 (21, 42) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Kidder County *** 130.9 (82.2, 203.5) 36 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Foster County *** 128.9 (87.7, 186.6) 37 (2, 48) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Rolette County *** 127.6 (88.3, 185.2) 38 (3, 48) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Divide County *** 126.4 (82.8, 193.8) 39 (2, 48) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Mountrail County *** 125.6 (91.1, 169.4) 40 (5, 48) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Emmons County *** 122.6 (83.4, 179.2) 41 (3, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
McIntosh County *** 118.6 (79.3, 179.9) 42 (4, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Steele County *** 117.9 (71.7, 192.8) 43 (2, 48) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Towner County *** 110.2 (70.2, 176.4) 44 (5, 48) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
McKenzie County *** 106.1 (75.5, 144.2) 45 (16, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Hettinger County *** 105.8 (67.7, 164.7) 46 (7, 48) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Grant County *** 103.4 (68.4, 161.4) 47 (13, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
LaMoure County *** 101.0 (67.0, 149.1) 48 (13, 48) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Billings County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2021 5:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2018) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top