Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Dakota N/A Yes 40.4 (38.4, 42.6) N/A 312 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.3)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Williams County Rural Yes 41.0 (31.8, 51.9) 13 (5, 20) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Ward County Urban Yes 39.2 (32.3, 47.1) 14 (6, 20) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.8)
Walsh County Rural Yes 44.4 (27.8, 68.1) 9 (2, 21) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.6)
Traill County Rural Yes 37.8 (21.8, 62.6) 17 (3, 21) 4
*
*
Stutsman County Rural Yes 44.2 (32.9, 58.5) 10 (3, 20) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Stark County Rural Yes 32.0 (23.4, 42.7) 20 (8, 21) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Rolette County Rural Yes 79.1 (57.3, 106.6) 1 (1, 7) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Richland County Rural Yes 37.6 (25.2, 54.3) 18 (4, 21) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Ramsey County Rural Yes 24.2 (13.2, 41.6) 21 (11, 21) 3 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.2)
Pembina County Rural Yes 66.2 (42.6, 100.4) 3 (1, 17) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.5)
Mountrail County Rural Yes 55.7 (36.0, 82.5) 4 (1, 20) 5
*
*
Morton County Urban Yes 46.2 (36.0, 58.5) 8 (3, 19) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Mercer County Rural Yes 53.6 (33.1, 83.1) 5 (1, 20) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
McLean County Rural Yes 47.0 (29.9, 71.7) 7 (2, 21) 5
*
*
McHenry County Urban Yes 50.4 (27.0, 87.8) 6 (1, 21) 3
*
*
Grand Forks County Urban Yes 42.0 (34.6, 50.4) 12 (5, 19) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Cass County Urban Yes 38.2 (34.0, 42.7) 16 (8, 20) 63 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Burleigh County Urban Yes 38.5 (33.1, 44.6) 15 (7, 20) 39 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Bottineau County Rural Yes 44.0 (23.6, 76.5) 11 (1, 21) 3
*
*
Benson County Rural Yes 77.2 (45.8, 121.9) 2 (1, 17) 4
*
*
Barnes County Rural Yes 35.1 (20.9, 56.3) 19 (4, 21) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.0)
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cavalier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eddy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmons County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hettinger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kidder County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaMoure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McKenzie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nelson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ransom County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sargent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top