Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
North Dakota N/A No 162.1 (156.6, 167.7) N/A 690 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Eddy County Rural No 210.2 (124.8, 342.1) 2 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.6)
Benson County Rural No 186.0 (122.3, 271.1) 12 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.3)
McHenry County Urban No 178.8 (121.2, 256.4) 17 (1, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Towner County Rural No 167.7 (94.1, 293.8) 21 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.3)
Bowman County Rural No 183.9 (111.8, 292.0) 15 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Dickey County Rural No 135.4 (86.2, 205.9) 38 (4, 41) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.4)
Foster County Rural No 197.9 (124.6, 303.6) 3 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Rolette County Rural No 241.4 (182.6, 312.3) 1 (1, 28) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Mercer County Rural No 172.1 (125.5, 231.7) 20 (2, 40) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Ramsey County Rural No 184.0 (144.1, 232.7) 14 (1, 37) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Traill County Rural No 166.0 (121.2, 223.7) 23 (2, 40) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Grant County Rural No 149.0 (83.0, 265.9) 34 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Bottineau County Rural No 192.3 (140.7, 259.7) 6 (1, 38) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Nelson County Rural No 187.4 (124.7, 283.6) 8 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.6)
Stark County Rural No 154.4 (127.5, 185.2) 33 (8, 39) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Williams County Rural No 158.9 (129.3, 192.8) 28 (6, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Grand Forks County Urban No 187.9 (166.7, 210.9) 7 (3, 27) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Pierce County Rural No 186.9 (124.7, 275.1) 10 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.1)
Barnes County Rural No 180.5 (139.7, 231.1) 16 (2, 38) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Burleigh County Urban No 154.6 (140.0, 170.3) 32 (15, 36) 86 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Morton County Urban No 192.5 (163.8, 224.8) 5 (2, 30) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Walsh County Rural No 186.0 (144.9, 236.5) 11 (1, 37) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Cass County Urban No 165.8 (152.9, 179.4) 24 (11, 32) 131 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Richland County Rural No 139.8 (109.8, 176.2) 37 (11, 41) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Stutsman County Rural No 162.3 (133.2, 196.3) 25 (5, 38) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
McLean County Rural No 156.8 (119.0, 204.7) 29 (4, 40) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Pembina County Rural No 194.2 (145.0, 257.6) 4 (1, 37) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Ransom County Rural No 160.9 (110.3, 229.6) 27 (1, 41) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Ward County Urban No 144.2 (125.9, 164.4) 36 (17, 39) 46 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Dunn County Rural No 161.6 (96.2, 255.6) 26 (1, 41) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Cavalier County Rural No 156.4 (97.0, 244.6) 30 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.8)
Mountrail County Rural No 155.1 (104.7, 220.1) 31 (2, 41) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.7)
Emmons County Rural No 148.9 (98.1, 230.1) 35 (2, 41) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.7)
McKenzie County Rural Yes 105.8 (67.5, 156.1) 40 (18, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.2)
LaMoure County Rural Yes 101.7 (59.2, 170.3) 41 (16, 41) 4 falling falling trend -6.9 (-16.6, -4.3)
Wells County Rural Yes 110.5 (69.9, 177.1) 39 (14, 41) 5 falling falling trend -40.8 (-68.6, -0.9)
Divide County Rural No 166.5 (88.2, 296.8) 22 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Hettinger County Rural No 174.2 (97.6, 296.8) 19 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Kidder County Rural No 176.5 (102.6, 294.5) 18 (1, 41) 4
*
*
McIntosh County Rural No 184.6 (105.1, 310.6) 13 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Sargent County Rural No 187.1 (124.1, 275.9) 9 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/09/2024 1:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top