Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota No 139.6 (136.0, 143.3) N/A 1,214 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Grand Forks County No 170.5 (156.4, 185.7) 1 (1, 19) 113 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Wells County No 170.3 (127.2, 227.3) 2 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Williams County No 164.1 (142.2, 188.3) 3 (1, 30) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Burke County No 162.7 (105.7, 245.7) 4 (1, 47) 5 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Barnes County No 162.1 (134.9, 194.1) 5 (1, 35) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Adams County No 161.7 (107.6, 241.4) 6 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
McHenry County No 160.8 (122.8, 208.2) 7 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Mercer County No 160.4 (128.0, 199.5) 8 (1, 40) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Eddy County No 157.8 (106.8, 233.3) 9 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Nelson County No 157.6 (115.7, 218.3) 10 (1, 44) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Walsh County No 157.5 (130.7, 189.6) 11 (1, 39) 27 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.0, 1.7)
Dickey County No 156.7 (120.3, 203.2) 12 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Hettinger County No 156.0 (105.6, 227.9) 13 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Cavalier County No 155.0 (111.0, 214.0) 14 (1, 45) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Morton County No 153.6 (136.0, 173.0) 15 (3, 33) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Divide County No 151.3 (98.5, 229.9) 16 (1, 47) 6 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.7, 9.7)
Bottineau County No 148.0 (114.9, 189.5) 17 (1, 44) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Traill County No 147.4 (117.6, 183.7) 18 (1, 43) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Renville County No 147.2 (98.5, 218.1) 19 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
McLean County No 146.0 (117.8, 180.2) 20 (1, 42) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pembina County No 145.7 (116.5, 182.3) 21 (1, 42) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Sargent County No 144.0 (104.4, 197.4) 22 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
McIntosh County No 143.7 (93.3, 219.1) 23 (1, 47) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Ramsey County No 143.1 (117.8, 173.3) 24 (2, 42) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Stutsman County No 140.3 (121.2, 161.9) 25 (5, 41) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Ransom County No 139.5 (102.7, 187.0) 26 (1, 46) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Richland County No 138.6 (116.5, 164.0) 27 (5, 42) 31 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Stark County No 136.7 (118.9, 156.5) 28 (8, 41) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Cass County No 136.2 (128.2, 144.7) 29 (15, 36) 227 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Bowman County No 135.9 (94.0, 195.2) 30 (1, 47) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Foster County No 130.6 (90.8, 186.5) 31 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Ward County No 129.4 (117.2, 142.6) 32 (15, 41) 86 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Burleigh County No 126.6 (117.4, 136.4) 33 (20, 41) 149 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Benson County No 126.1 (83.1, 188.7) 34 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
McKenzie County Yes 121.2 (89.8, 159.5) 35 (5, 47) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Mountrail County Yes 120.2 (85.7, 164.3) 36 (3, 47) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Kidder County Yes 119.7 (73.6, 190.0) 37 (1, 47) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Logan County Yes 118.2 (70.3, 196.3) 38 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Towner County Yes 117.9 (75.7, 187.3) 39 (2, 47) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Pierce County Yes 117.1 (84.8, 162.3) 40 (6, 47) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Dunn County Yes 110.6 (69.3, 168.5) 41 (2, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Grant County Yes 106.4 (68.3, 168.8) 42 (4, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
LaMoure County Yes 104.9 (69.5, 154.9) 43 (6, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Steele County Yes 101.3 (59.8, 171.7) 44 (3, 47) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Griggs County Yes 100.9 (62.9, 164.2) 45 (6, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Rolette County Yes 100.5 (67.4, 152.9) 46 (10, 47) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Emmons County Yes 100.4 (67.8, 150.0) 47 (11, 47) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Billings County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2024 10:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top