Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota N/A No 30.5 (28.9, 32.2) N/A 287 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.3, -2.6)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Rolette County Rural No 76.5 (55.2, 103.3) 1 (1, 2) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Benson County Rural No 46.4 (26.1, 77.1) 2 (1, 19) 3
*
*
Ramsey County Rural No 38.5 (26.4, 55.0) 3 (2, 18) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Pembina County Rural No 37.0 (23.4, 58.2) 4 (2, 19) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Walsh County Rural No 36.9 (25.0, 53.6) 5 (2, 18) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Grand Forks County Urban No 35.7 (29.7, 42.5) 6 (2, 15) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Williams County Rural No 34.4 (25.5, 45.2) 7 (2, 18) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Stark County Rural No 32.7 (24.4, 42.9) 8 (2, 18) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Cass County Urban No 32.6 (28.8, 36.7) 9 (4, 16) 57 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.2)
Stutsman County Rural No 32.2 (23.8, 42.9) 10 (2, 18) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Mercer County Rural No 32.0 (19.7, 50.7) 11 (2, 19) 4
*
*
Traill County Rural No 31.8 (18.8, 51.5) 12 (2, 19) 4 stable stable trend -12.8 (-31.7, 1.0)
Bottineau County Rural No 30.9 (18.4, 51.3) 13 (2, 19) 4
*
*
Ward County Urban No 29.7 (24.3, 36.0) 14 (5, 18) 21 falling falling trend -4.5 (-16.3, -1.9)
Morton County Urban No 29.2 (22.1, 38.0) 15 (4, 19) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Burleigh County Urban No 27.1 (23.0, 31.6) 16 (9, 19) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.5)
McLean County Rural Yes 25.1 (15.6, 39.9) 17 (4, 19) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Barnes County Rural Yes 24.4 (15.2, 38.4) 18 (4, 19) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Richland County Rural Yes 21.5 (14.0, 32.2) 19 (9, 19) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cavalier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eddy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmons County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hettinger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kidder County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaMoure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McHenry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McKenzie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mountrail County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nelson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ransom County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sargent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/13/2024 9:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top