Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio No 166.1 (165.2, 167.1) N/A 25,270 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Adams County No 245.8 (223.3, 270.2) 1 (1, 5) 92 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Lawrence County No 217.5 (203.3, 232.5) 2 (1, 11) 182 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Fayette County No 212.6 (191.7, 235.2) 3 (1, 28) 79 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Vinton County No 211.8 (181.2, 246.4) 4 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Jackson County No 208.5 (188.9, 229.8) 5 (1, 34) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Gallia County No 203.3 (183.9, 224.4) 6 (1, 43) 85 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Brown County No 199.2 (183.4, 216.1) 7 (2, 38) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Pickaway County No 195.2 (180.7, 210.7) 8 (2, 42) 138 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Pike County No 193.0 (173.6, 214.1) 9 (2, 66) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Scioto County No 192.5 (180.5, 205.2) 10 (3, 39) 200 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Meigs County No 192.1 (171.2, 215.2) 11 (2, 73) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Preble County No 187.6 (171.6, 204.7) 12 (3, 66) 108 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Highland County No 186.9 (171.1, 203.8) 13 (3, 67) 109 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 186.7 (174.8, 199.4) 14 (4, 54) 195 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Paulding County No 186.4 (162.9, 212.6) 15 (2, 79) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Crawford County No 186.1 (171.0, 202.4) 16 (3, 62) 118 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Ross County No 185.7 (173.7, 198.4) 17 (4, 54) 184 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Logan County No 183.7 (168.7, 199.8) 18 (4, 68) 116 falling falling trend -8.0 (-15.2, -0.1)
Hardin County No 183.1 (164.0, 203.8) 19 (2, 79) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Clinton County No 183.0 (167.2, 200.1) 20 (3, 71) 102 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Columbiana County No 182.9 (173.2, 193.1) 21 (7, 52) 283 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Guernsey County No 182.7 (166.9, 199.6) 22 (4, 72) 104 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Ashtabula County No 182.5 (172.4, 193.1) 23 (7, 55) 255 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Hocking County No 182.4 (163.8, 202.8) 24 (3, 79) 73 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Fulton County No 181.3 (165.5, 198.3) 25 (4, 75) 102 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Lucas County No 180.8 (175.7, 186.1) 26 (12, 42) 974 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
Ottawa County No 180.8 (166.3, 196.4) 27 (5, 71) 129 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Perry County No 180.5 (163.2, 199.4) 28 (4, 78) 83 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Clark County No 179.4 (170.8, 188.4) 29 (9, 58) 345 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Marion County No 179.2 (166.7, 192.6) 30 (7, 69) 157 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Williams County No 177.9 (161.9, 195.2) 31 (6, 78) 95 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Richland County No 177.7 (168.8, 186.9) 32 (10, 61) 315 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Morgan County No 177.5 (153.2, 205.1) 33 (2, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Champaign County No 176.1 (160.2, 193.2) 34 (6, 79) 94 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Morrow County No 175.4 (158.4, 193.8) 35 (5, 80) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Darke County No 175.3 (161.8, 189.7) 36 (8, 76) 132 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Sandusky County No 175.1 (162.3, 188.8) 37 (7, 76) 146 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Madison County No 174.4 (158.7, 191.3) 38 (6, 82) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Muskingum County No 174.2 (163.4, 185.5) 39 (11, 72) 202 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.6)
Coshocton County No 173.5 (157.4, 190.9) 40 (7, 81) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Tuscarawas County No 173.3 (163.2, 184.0) 41 (13, 74) 232 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Allen County No 173.2 (163.2, 183.7) 42 (12, 72) 235 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Seneca County No 172.5 (159.2, 186.7) 43 (10, 79) 132 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Montgomery County No 171.5 (167.2, 176.0) 44 (28, 60) 1,237 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Carroll County No 170.9 (153.2, 190.3) 45 (6, 84) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Washington County No 170.0 (158.0, 182.7) 46 (12, 80) 159 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Cuyahoga County No 168.9 (166.1, 171.7) 47 (36, 62) 2,935 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Huron County No 168.6 (155.4, 182.7) 48 (12, 81) 126 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Stark County No 168.0 (163.0, 173.1) 49 (32, 70) 912 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Licking County No 167.1 (159.5, 175.1) 50 (25, 76) 371 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Clermont County No 166.1 (159.0, 173.5) 51 (30, 77) 430 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Defiance County No 165.9 (150.5, 182.7) 52 (10, 84) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Athens County No 165.6 (151.5, 180.7) 53 (13, 83) 107 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Hamilton County No 165.5 (161.9, 169.3) 54 (40, 70) 1,615 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Van Wert County No 165.5 (147.8, 184.9) 55 (7, 85) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Portage County No 165.4 (157.4, 173.7) 56 (29, 79) 338 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Knox County No 165.0 (152.7, 178.2) 57 (16, 82) 139 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Shelby County No 164.8 (150.6, 180.1) 58 (13, 84) 104 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Wyandot County No 164.5 (144.8, 186.5) 59 (7, 86) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Butler County No 164.2 (158.8, 169.8) 60 (37, 77) 717 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Erie County No 163.8 (153.3, 175.0) 61 (24, 82) 196 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Wood County No 163.6 (154.5, 173.2) 62 (27, 81) 249 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Ashland County No 163.6 (150.6, 177.5) 63 (16, 83) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Miami County No 163.5 (154.2, 173.2) 64 (27, 81) 241 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Summit County No 163.4 (159.2, 167.7) 65 (42, 74) 1,207 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Lorain County No 162.3 (156.9, 168.0) 66 (41, 78) 692 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Belmont County No 161.8 (150.7, 173.6) 67 (25, 83) 168 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Hancock County No 161.4 (150.2, 173.2) 68 (25, 83) 161 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Trumbull County No 160.6 (154.1, 167.3) 69 (40, 81) 497 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Harrison County No 159.8 (137.3, 185.6) 70 (8, 87) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Monroe County No 158.2 (135.6, 184.3) 71 (8, 88) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Holmes County No 158.0 (142.0, 175.4) 72 (19, 86) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lake County No 158.0 (152.0, 164.2) 73 (49, 82) 546 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Auglaize County No 157.5 (143.6, 172.5) 74 (26, 86) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Fairfield County No 156.2 (148.2, 164.5) 75 (45, 83) 297 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Franklin County No 155.9 (152.8, 159.1) 76 (63, 81) 1,953 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Union County No 155.4 (140.8, 171.0) 77 (25, 86) 88 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Mercer County No 155.3 (140.5, 171.4) 78 (24, 87) 86 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Wayne County No 155.0 (146.1, 164.4) 79 (44, 84) 238 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Henry County No 153.7 (136.3, 172.9) 80 (20, 87) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Mahoning County No 153.5 (147.7, 159.6) 81 (58, 83) 553 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.9)
Greene County No 147.4 (140.1, 155.0) 82 (67, 86) 318 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Medina County No 142.9 (136.1, 150.0) 83 (75, 87) 345 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Warren County No 141.7 (135.3, 148.4) 84 (77, 87) 372 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Geauga County No 135.7 (127.0, 144.9) 85 (78, 88) 192 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Putnam County No 133.4 (118.7, 149.6) 86 (71, 88) 63 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Noble County No 128.0 (106.6, 153.2) 87 (54, 88) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Delaware County No 124.8 (118.0, 131.9) 88 (85, 88) 265 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 8:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top