Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio No 199.6 (198.0, 201.1) N/A 13,332 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Adams County No 289.2 (253.6, 328.8) 1 (1, 17) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lawrence County No 273.1 (249.5, 298.4) 2 (1, 15) 104 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Gallia County No 272.3 (238.6, 309.6) 3 (1, 28) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Vinton County No 265.4 (214.7, 325.0) 4 (1, 79) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Fayette County No 256.6 (221.7, 295.5) 5 (1, 53) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pickaway County No 250.4 (226.0, 276.9) 6 (1, 35) 80 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Jackson County No 250.1 (217.7, 286.1) 7 (1, 60) 47 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Scioto County No 245.4 (225.1, 267.1) 8 (2, 38) 112 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Fulton County No 241.2 (214.0, 271.0) 9 (1, 59) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Ross County No 240.4 (219.6, 262.6) 10 (2, 43) 107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Jefferson County No 237.9 (217.7, 259.7) 11 (2, 43) 109 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Paulding County No 236.4 (197.6, 281.1) 12 (1, 82) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Meigs County No 233.7 (200.0, 271.9) 13 (1, 78) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Pike County No 231.9 (200.7, 266.9) 14 (1, 78) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Columbiana County No 229.8 (213.7, 246.8) 15 (4, 46) 162 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Muskingum County No 228.2 (209.5, 248.2) 16 (4, 57) 115 stable stable trend -6.6 (-12.8, 0.0)
Crawford County No 228.1 (203.4, 255.3) 17 (3, 69) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Brown County No 223.8 (199.6, 250.3) 18 (4, 77) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Williams County No 223.3 (196.5, 253.0) 19 (3, 76) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Preble County No 222.5 (196.9, 250.7) 20 (3, 77) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Perry County No 222.2 (192.8, 255.0) 21 (3, 80) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Clinton County No 221.5 (195.3, 250.3) 22 (3, 78) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Harrison County No 221.0 (181.8, 267.1) 23 (1, 86) 24 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Allen County No 220.2 (203.3, 238.1) 24 (7, 64) 133 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Morrow County No 220.1 (192.0, 251.4) 25 (3, 80) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Highland County No 220.0 (195.1, 247.5) 26 (3, 79) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Ashtabula County No 218.0 (201.6, 235.4) 27 (8, 69) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Hocking County No 217.9 (188.1, 251.4) 28 (3, 83) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Lucas County No 216.8 (208.2, 225.8) 29 (15, 50) 505 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Marion County No 215.4 (195.0, 237.5) 30 (7, 76) 86 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Shelby County No 215.4 (191.1, 242.1) 31 (4, 81) 61 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Logan County No 213.9 (189.9, 240.3) 32 (5, 80) 62 falling falling trend -7.2 (-13.8, -0.1)
Darke County No 212.5 (190.6, 236.4) 33 (7, 79) 72 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Clark County No 212.2 (198.3, 226.9) 34 (13, 69) 182 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Coshocton County No 211.5 (185.2, 240.7) 35 (5, 83) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Champaign County No 211.2 (185.4, 239.9) 36 (6, 83) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Hardin County No 210.3 (180.4, 244.0) 37 (4, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Guernsey County No 209.0 (184.5, 236.2) 38 (7, 83) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Sandusky County No 208.5 (187.8, 231.0) 39 (8, 80) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Richland County No 208.4 (194.1, 223.4) 40 (15, 75) 165 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Seneca County No 207.8 (185.9, 231.7) 41 (8, 82) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Montgomery County No 207.1 (199.8, 214.5) 42 (25, 63) 644 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Tuscarawas County No 206.7 (190.2, 224.3) 43 (14, 79) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Carroll County No 204.8 (176.9, 236.4) 44 (6, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Stark County No 204.7 (196.5, 213.3) 45 (25, 67) 486 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Cuyahoga County No 203.6 (198.9, 208.4) 46 (32, 62) 1,489 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Athens County No 203.6 (179.3, 230.2) 47 (8, 84) 57 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Morgan County No 203.0 (165.5, 247.5) 48 (3, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Washington County No 202.6 (183.3, 223.6) 49 (13, 82) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Henry County No 202.6 (173.1, 236.0) 50 (6, 86) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Belmont County No 202.4 (183.8, 222.5) 51 (13, 82) 92 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Clermont County No 201.8 (189.9, 214.2) 52 (23, 77) 234 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Madison County No 201.4 (176.2, 229.3) 53 (9, 85) 49 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Union County No 201.1 (175.9, 228.8) 54 (8, 85) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Hancock County No 200.5 (181.8, 220.6) 55 (15, 82) 89 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ottawa County No 200.4 (179.0, 224.2) 56 (11, 84) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Huron County No 199.5 (178.3, 222.6) 57 (13, 85) 68 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Butler County No 197.6 (188.6, 207.0) 58 (32, 77) 380 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Knox County No 197.4 (177.4, 219.2) 59 (15, 84) 74 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Van Wert County No 197.2 (168.6, 229.5) 60 (8, 87) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Hamilton County No 196.0 (189.8, 202.3) 61 (39, 75) 815 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Defiance County No 195.7 (170.7, 223.4) 62 (12, 86) 47 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.9)
Summit County No 195.4 (188.4, 202.5) 63 (40, 76) 628 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Ashland County No 195.3 (174.5, 218.1) 64 (17, 85) 67 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Wood County No 194.7 (179.7, 210.7) 65 (25, 83) 130 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Erie County No 194.6 (177.9, 212.6) 66 (23, 84) 107 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Lorain County No 194.2 (185.2, 203.6) 67 (37, 80) 366 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Trumbull County No 194.0 (183.5, 205.1) 68 (33, 80) 268 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Licking County No 193.4 (180.9, 206.6) 69 (30, 82) 190 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Auglaize County No 193.3 (170.5, 218.4) 70 (14, 86) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Lake County No 192.8 (182.7, 203.4) 71 (37, 81) 287 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Wyandot County No 189.9 (158.7, 225.9) 72 (9, 87) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Miami County No 189.0 (173.9, 205.0) 73 (30, 85) 122 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Mahoning County No 187.4 (177.6, 197.6) 74 (45, 83) 289 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.3)
Fairfield County No 186.6 (173.5, 200.4) 75 (39, 85) 159 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Holmes County No 185.2 (159.7, 213.4) 76 (16, 87) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Franklin County No 184.4 (179.0, 189.8) 77 (61, 82) 991 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.2)
Portage County No 184.0 (171.5, 197.2) 78 (42, 85) 172 stable stable trend -7.8 (-18.3, 3.9)
Mercer County No 183.3 (160.1, 209.0) 79 (21, 87) 48 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Monroe County No 181.3 (147.2, 222.4) 80 (9, 88) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Wayne County No 180.0 (165.9, 195.0) 81 (48, 86) 126 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Greene County No 171.0 (159.2, 183.4) 82 (66, 87) 165 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Medina County No 168.8 (157.7, 180.5) 83 (69, 87) 183 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Putnam County No 167.7 (143.4, 195.1) 84 (35, 88) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Warren County No 165.6 (155.0, 176.8) 85 (74, 87) 193 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Geauga County No 161.3 (147.2, 176.5) 86 (71, 88) 102 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Delaware County No 143.9 (132.9, 155.6) 87 (84, 88) 137 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Noble County No 129.5 (101.8, 164.3) 88 (76, 88) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top