Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 203.2 (201.6, 204.8) N/A 13,339 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States *** 181.4 (181.1, 181.7) N/A 314,987 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Noble County *** 129.8 (102.3, 164.2) 88 (80, 88) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Delaware County *** 141.1 (129.9, 152.9) 87 (85, 88) 127 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Geauga County *** 161.3 (147.1, 176.6) 86 (75, 88) 101 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Greene County *** 168.5 (156.7, 180.9) 85 (72, 87) 159 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Warren County *** 174.1 (162.9, 185.7) 84 (70, 86) 194 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Medina County *** 177.3 (165.7, 189.5) 83 (63, 86) 185 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Wayne County *** 181.4 (167.1, 196.6) 82 (47, 86) 124 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Putnam County *** 181.6 (156.1, 210.3) 81 (18, 87) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Fairfield County *** 186.2 (173.0, 200.2) 80 (41, 86) 154 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Auglaize County *** 188.9 (166.5, 213.7) 79 (21, 86) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Franklin County *** 190.9 (185.4, 196.5) 78 (56, 81) 998 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.1)
Mahoning County *** 191.2 (181.3, 201.6) 77 (41, 83) 291 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.5, -2.1)
Miami County *** 192.7 (177.5, 209.0) 76 (27, 85) 123 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Holmes County *** 194.4 (168.1, 223.5) 75 (11, 86) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Erie County *** 195.3 (178.5, 213.3) 74 (21, 85) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Knox County *** 195.5 (175.6, 217.3) 73 (17, 86) 73 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Monroe County *** 195.7 (159.8, 238.6) 72 (5, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Union County *** 197.0 (171.6, 224.9) 71 (10, 86) 48 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Mercer County *** 197.3 (173.0, 224.3) 70 (11, 86) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Butler County *** 197.7 (188.5, 207.1) 69 (35, 80) 371 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Defiance County *** 197.7 (172.6, 225.6) 68 (11, 86) 47 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.6, -1.5)
Portage County *** 198.6 (185.5, 212.4) 67 (26, 81) 182 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Wood County *** 199.1 (183.7, 215.5) 66 (22, 84) 130 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Lake County *** 199.7 (189.3, 210.5) 65 (30, 80) 292 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Ashland County *** 199.9 (178.7, 223.1) 64 (13, 85) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Henry County *** 200.3 (171.1, 233.4) 63 (6, 86) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Trumbull County *** 200.5 (189.7, 211.7) 62 (28, 79) 273 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Summit County *** 200.5 (193.4, 207.8) 61 (36, 76) 635 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Hancock County *** 200.7 (182.0, 220.9) 60 (16, 84) 88 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hamilton County *** 200.8 (194.5, 207.2) 59 (37, 74) 822 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Belmont County *** 201.2 (182.8, 221.2) 58 (15, 84) 92 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Wyandot County *** 201.4 (169.0, 238.6) 57 (4, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Seneca County *** 201.6 (180.0, 225.2) 56 (12, 85) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Clermont County *** 201.6 (189.6, 214.2) 55 (24, 81) 227 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Washington County *** 202.6 (183.4, 223.5) 54 (15, 84) 85 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Van Wert County *** 202.7 (173.6, 235.5) 53 (6, 86) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Athens County *** 202.8 (178.6, 229.4) 52 (8, 86) 56 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Huron County *** 203.6 (181.9, 227.2) 51 (11, 84) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lorain County *** 204.6 (195.2, 214.4) 50 (23, 76) 373 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Madison County *** 205.0 (179.2, 233.6) 49 (7, 85) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Cuyahoga County *** 205.7 (200.9, 210.5) 48 (33, 65) 1,494 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Stark County *** 206.6 (198.3, 215.2) 47 (25, 70) 485 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Ottawa County *** 207.0 (184.8, 231.6) 46 (9, 83) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Montgomery County *** 208.2 (200.9, 215.7) 45 (25, 68) 640 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Licking County *** 208.5 (195.3, 222.4) 44 (17, 76) 198 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Richland County *** 209.0 (194.7, 224.2) 43 (15, 78) 163 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Harrison County *** 210.3 (171.8, 255.8) 42 (2, 86) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Coshocton County *** 210.8 (184.4, 240.2) 41 (5, 85) 48 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Carroll County *** 211.0 (182.5, 243.3) 40 (4, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Champaign County *** 211.1 (185.0, 240.0) 39 (5, 84) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Tuscarawas County *** 212.1 (195.4, 229.9) 38 (11, 79) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Marion County *** 213.8 (193.4, 235.9) 37 (8, 80) 84 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Perry County *** 213.9 (185.2, 246.0) 36 (3, 85) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Preble County *** 214.0 (188.7, 241.9) 35 (5, 83) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Hocking County *** 214.1 (184.2, 247.9) 34 (3, 85) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Darke County *** 214.5 (192.4, 238.5) 33 (5, 81) 72 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Williams County *** 214.9 (188.6, 244.2) 32 (3, 84) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Morgan County *** 215.6 (176.2, 262.1) 31 (1, 86) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Clark County *** 215.6 (201.5, 230.5) 30 (12, 72) 182 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Shelby County *** 216.0 (191.5, 242.8) 29 (4, 82) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Columbiana County *** 216.6 (201.0, 233.2) 28 (9, 72) 151 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Sandusky County *** 217.1 (195.9, 240.2) 27 (6, 80) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Clinton County *** 218.5 (192.3, 247.4) 26 (3, 82) 53 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lucas County *** 219.5 (210.8, 228.6) 25 (13, 50) 503 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Crawford County *** 220.1 (195.8, 247.0) 24 (3, 80) 62 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Guernsey County *** 221.5 (196.1, 249.5) 23 (3, 81) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Highland County *** 222.3 (196.9, 250.2) 22 (2, 78) 58 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Hardin County *** 223.3 (191.8, 258.5) 21 (2, 83) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Morrow County *** 226.5 (197.5, 258.7) 20 (2, 81) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Meigs County *** 227.9 (194.1, 266.3) 19 (1, 83) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Logan County *** 229.1 (204.0, 256.6) 18 (2, 75) 64 stable stable trend -9.8 (-20.0, 1.8)
Paulding County *** 230.2 (191.6, 274.7) 17 (1, 84) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Allen County *** 231.1 (213.7, 249.5) 16 (3, 54) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Ashtabula County *** 233.4 (216.4, 251.6) 15 (3, 50) 146 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Muskingum County *** 236.5 (217.3, 257.0) 14 (3, 49) 118 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Jackson County *** 236.6 (204.9, 271.9) 13 (1, 78) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Brown County *** 238.9 (213.5, 266.7) 12 (1, 62) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Fulton County *** 241.4 (214.1, 271.5) 11 (1, 61) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Pike County *** 241.5 (209.3, 277.6) 10 (1, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Jefferson County *** 242.7 (222.3, 264.7) 9 (2, 43) 111 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Ross County *** 243.5 (222.5, 265.9) 8 (2, 42) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Scioto County *** 245.6 (225.3, 267.3) 7 (1, 39) 113 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Vinton County *** 245.8 (197.4, 303.0) 6 (1, 84) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Pickaway County *** 249.6 (225.0, 276.1) 5 (1, 43) 79 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Fayette County *** 260.9 (225.9, 300.0) 4 (1, 52) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Gallia County *** 261.0 (228.0, 297.6) 3 (1, 46) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Lawrence County *** 267.3 (243.9, 292.5) 2 (1, 21) 100 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.4)
Adams County *** 296.2 (259.5, 337.0) 1 (1, 15) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2021 2:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top