Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Esophagus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.2) N/A 765 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
United States *** 3.9 (3.8, 3.9) N/A 15,474 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Jackson County *** 9.2 (5.5, 14.7) 1 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Auglaize County *** 8.9 (5.8, 13.2) 2 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Gallia County *** 8.6 (4.8, 14.4) 3 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Sandusky County *** 8.6 (6.0, 12.1) 4 (1, 44) 7 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 4.9)
Perry County *** 8.0 (4.7, 13.0) 5 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Lawrence County *** 7.9 (5.4, 11.2) 6 (1, 52) 7
*
*
Coshocton County *** 7.7 (4.5, 12.5) 7 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Crawford County *** 7.6 (4.8, 11.6) 8 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.8)
Huron County *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.8) 9 (1, 58) 6
*
*
Champaign County *** 7.3 (4.3, 11.6) 10 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Fulton County *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.0) 11 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Muskingum County *** 6.8 (4.7, 9.6) 12 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Mercer County *** 6.6 (4.0, 10.7) 13 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Clermont County *** 6.5 (5.2, 8.2) 14 (3, 46) 17 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 3.9)
Portage County *** 6.3 (4.8, 8.1) 15 (3, 53) 13 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.2)
Columbiana County *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.4) 16 (2, 56) 10
*
*
Lucas County *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 17 (5, 41) 33 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.4)
Pickaway County *** 6.1 (3.8, 9.5) 18 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Allen County *** 6.1 (4.3, 8.3) 19 (3, 58) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.9)
Richland County *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.1) 20 (3, 57) 11 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.2)
Ottawa County *** 5.9 (3.7, 9.4) 21 (2, 61) 5
*
*
Shelby County *** 5.8 (3.5, 9.3) 22 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Logan County *** 5.8 (3.3, 9.5) 23 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Butler County *** 5.8 (4.8, 6.9) 24 (7, 50) 25 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.6)
Union County *** 5.6 (3.2, 9.3) 25 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Ashtabula County *** 5.6 (4.0, 7.8) 26 (4, 60) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Highland County *** 5.5 (3.1, 9.3) 27 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Lorain County *** 5.5 (4.5, 6.7) 28 (9, 54) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Washington County *** 5.4 (3.5, 8.3) 29 (3, 61) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Athens County *** 5.4 (3.2, 8.8) 30 (2, 61) 4
*
*
Fairfield County *** 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 31 (7, 59) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Stark County *** 5.3 (4.4, 6.2) 32 (13, 55) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Wayne County *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.3) 33 (6, 60) 8
*
*
Scioto County *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.7) 34 (4, 61) 6
*
*
Trumbull County *** 5.2 (4.1, 6.6) 35 (9, 58) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Brown County *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.6) 36 (2, 61) 3
*
*
Belmont County *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.7) 37 (4, 61) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Hancock County *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.6) 38 (5, 61) 5
*
*
Jefferson County *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.6) 39 (5, 61) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.0)
Montgomery County *** 5.0 (4.3, 5.8) 40 (17, 55) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.1)
Tuscarawas County *** 4.9 (3.4, 7.1) 41 (6, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.8)
Darke County *** 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 42 (3, 61) 3
*
*
Summit County *** 4.8 (4.1, 5.6) 43 (20, 56) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Clark County *** 4.8 (3.5, 6.4) 44 (11, 60) 10 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.6)
Medina County *** 4.8 (3.6, 6.2) 45 (12, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Miami County *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.6) 46 (9, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Licking County *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.2) 47 (13, 60) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Mahoning County *** 4.7 (3.7, 5.8) 48 (17, 60) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Greene County *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 49 (12, 61) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Marion County *** 4.5 (2.7, 7.1) 50 (6, 61) 4
*
*
Erie County *** 4.4 (2.9, 6.7) 51 (8, 61) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Ross County *** 4.4 (2.7, 6.8) 52 (8, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Knox County *** 4.4 (2.6, 7.1) 53 (6, 61) 4
*
*
Cuyahoga County *** 4.4 (3.9, 4.8) 54 (32, 57) 76 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lake County *** 4.3 (3.3, 5.4) 55 (22, 60) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Hamilton County *** 4.2 (3.6, 4.8) 56 (32, 59) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Wood County *** 4.2 (2.8, 6.0) 57 (13, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Franklin County *** 4.1 (3.6, 4.6) 58 (36, 60) 50 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Delaware County *** 3.6 (2.5, 4.9) 59 (29, 61) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Warren County *** 3.4 (2.4, 4.5) 60 (35, 61) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Geauga County *** 2.4 (1.4, 4.0) 61 (48, 61) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Defiance County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guernsey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Preble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seneca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 3:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Adams, Ashland, Carroll, Clinton, Defiance, Fayette, Guernsey, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Hocking, Holmes, Madison, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan, Morrow, Noble, Paulding, Pike, Preble, Putnam, Seneca, Van Wert, Vinton, Williams, Wyandot

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top