Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Ohio N/A *** 12.1 (11.9, 12.4) N/A 1,912 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Lawrence County Urban *** 14.6 (11.1, 19.0) 9 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 16.1)
Preble County Rural *** 15.5 (11.2, 21.1) 4 (1, 76) 9 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.1, 4.6)
Ross County Rural *** 15.0 (11.8, 18.9) 5 (1, 71) 16 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.1, 4.0)
Washington County Rural *** 13.8 (10.6, 17.9) 12 (1, 79) 13 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 4.2)
Knox County Rural *** 11.6 (8.6, 15.5) 55 (4, 83) 10 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.8)
Allen County Urban *** 13.5 (10.9, 16.7) 18 (2, 75) 19 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.9)
Hardin County Rural *** 15.8 (10.5, 22.9) 3 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.0)
Huron County Rural *** 12.7 (9.3, 17.0) 32 (2, 82) 10 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.4)
Ashtabula County Urban *** 13.8 (11.2, 16.9) 14 (2, 73) 20 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.8)
Crawford County Rural *** 14.7 (10.8, 19.9) 8 (1, 78) 9 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 3.4)
Ottawa County Urban *** 13.7 (10.2, 18.5) 15 (1, 81) 10 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.6)
Van Wert County Rural *** 18.7 (13.2, 26.0) 1 (1, 70) 8 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.3)
Jackson County Rural *** 11.4 (7.2, 17.3) 62 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.7)
Shelby County Rural *** 11.6 (8.1, 16.3) 57 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.8)
Fairfield County Urban *** 13.6 (11.4, 16.1) 16 (3, 70) 28 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 3.1)
Miami County Urban *** 13.9 (11.3, 16.8) 11 (2, 71) 22 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.4)
Seneca County Rural *** 12.9 (9.4, 17.4) 27 (1, 82) 10 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 3.0)
Columbiana County Rural *** 12.1 (9.7, 14.9) 42 (5, 80) 19 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.6)
Wayne County Rural *** 12.8 (10.4, 15.7) 29 (4, 77) 21 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.7)
Scioto County Rural *** 12.7 (9.7, 16.3) 31 (2, 80) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.8)
Tuscarawas County Rural *** 9.6 (7.4, 12.4) 77 (18, 83) 13 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.5)
Jefferson County Urban *** 14.8 (11.5, 19.0) 7 (1, 73) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.3)
Coshocton County Rural *** 10.6 (7.0, 15.7) 70 (2, 83) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.0)
Lucas County Urban *** 13.4 (12.0, 14.9) 22 (7, 57) 73 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Hancock County Rural *** 13.8 (10.7, 17.6) 13 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.5)
Richland County Urban *** 12.6 (10.3, 15.2) 36 (4, 77) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.1)
Gallia County Rural *** 11.9 (7.7, 17.8) 50 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.3)
Greene County Urban *** 11.7 (9.7, 14.0) 54 (10, 80) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.9)
Stark County Urban *** 12.2 (10.9, 13.6) 40 (13, 69) 69 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Wood County Urban *** 13.5 (11.1, 16.4) 19 (2, 74) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.2)
Hamilton County Urban *** 12.6 (11.6, 13.6) 34 (14, 60) 130 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
Hocking County Urban *** 11.4 (7.2, 17.7) 59 (1, 83) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 3.0)
Lorain County Urban *** 11.9 (10.4, 13.4) 49 (13, 74) 53 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Mercer County Rural *** 13.5 (9.6, 18.5) 21 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.7)
Franklin County Urban *** 12.0 (11.2, 12.9) 43 (21, 65) 156 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.1)
Fulton County Urban *** 12.9 (9.1, 17.9) 28 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.7)
Highland County Rural *** 10.5 (7.1, 15.1) 71 (3, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.7)
Portage County Urban *** 12.6 (10.5, 15.0) 35 (5, 74) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.7)
Sandusky County Rural *** 13.0 (9.7, 17.0) 26 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.2)
Summit County Urban *** 11.8 (10.7, 13.0) 52 (20, 70) 90 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.0)
Union County Urban *** 11.6 (8.2, 16.0) 56 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 3.0)
Clermont County Urban *** 10.9 (9.2, 12.9) 67 (17, 80) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.8)
Marion County Rural *** 11.4 (8.4, 15.2) 60 (4, 83) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.0)
Medina County Urban *** 9.7 (8.0, 11.6) 76 (37, 83) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-8.9, 7.8)
Lake County Urban *** 11.9 (10.3, 13.6) 47 (11, 75) 44 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Licking County Urban *** 12.5 (10.5, 14.8) 39 (6, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6)
Pickaway County Urban *** 11.3 (8.1, 15.5) 65 (3, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.3)
Butler County Urban *** 12.5 (11.1, 14.1) 38 (9, 67) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.3)
Trumbull County Urban *** 11.8 (10.2, 13.8) 51 (11, 77) 38 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Warren County Urban *** 10.9 (9.2, 12.8) 68 (18, 81) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 2.0)
Brown County Urban *** 13.6 (9.7, 18.7) 17 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 2.1)
Delaware County Urban *** 10.3 (8.5, 12.3) 73 (24, 83) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 2.0)
Montgomery County Urban *** 11.4 (10.3, 12.6) 61 (24, 75) 84 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Muskingum County Rural *** 10.0 (7.6, 13.0) 75 (14, 83) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 2.0)
Erie County Urban *** 12.6 (9.9, 15.8) 37 (3, 80) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Belmont County Urban *** 11.4 (8.6, 14.9) 64 (5, 83) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Clark County Urban *** 8.8 (7.1, 11.0) 81 (44, 83) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Ashland County Rural *** 11.0 (7.9, 15.0) 66 (4, 83) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Williams County Rural *** 10.1 (6.7, 14.9) 74 (5, 83) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.4)
Darke County Rural *** 9.3 (6.3, 13.2) 80 (9, 83) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Logan County Rural *** 9.5 (6.4, 13.7) 78 (10, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-18.3, 1.0)
Mahoning County Urban *** 9.4 (8.1, 11.0) 79 (49, 83) 36 stable stable trend -3.7 (-16.2, 0.1)
Cuyahoga County Urban *** 12.8 (12.0, 13.6) 30 (14, 54) 227 stable stable trend -5.4 (-10.2, 0.2)
Adams County Rural *** 13.2 (8.5, 19.7) 24 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Athens County Rural *** 13.0 (9.3, 17.7) 25 (1, 82) 9
*
*
Auglaize County Rural *** 18.2 (13.7, 23.8) 2 (1, 57) 12
*
*
Carroll County Urban *** 11.4 (7.3, 17.4) 63 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Champaign County Rural *** 13.5 (9.6, 18.7) 20 (1, 82) 8
*
*
Clinton County Rural *** 11.9 (8.2, 16.9) 46 (2, 83) 7
*
*
Defiance County Rural *** 10.8 (7.2, 15.7) 69 (3, 83) 6
*
*
Fayette County Rural *** 11.8 (7.4, 18.1) 53 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Geauga County Urban *** 12.1 (9.7, 15.1) 41 (5, 79) 18
*
*
Guernsey County Rural *** 12.0 (8.0, 17.4) 45 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Henry County Rural *** 11.9 (7.3, 18.4) 48 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Holmes County Rural *** 7.8 (4.6, 12.5) 83 (12, 83) 4
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 13.2 (9.3, 18.3) 23 (1, 82) 8
*
*
Meigs County Rural *** 14.9 (9.4, 22.9) 6 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Morrow County Urban *** 11.6 (7.6, 17.2) 58 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Paulding County Rural *** 12.6 (7.3, 20.8) 33 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Perry County Urban *** 14.0 (9.5, 20.1) 10 (1, 82) 7
*
*
Pike County Rural *** 10.5 (6.5, 16.4) 72 (2, 83) 4
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 8.2 (4.9, 13.0) 82 (10, 83) 4
*
*
Wyandot County Rural *** 12.0 (7.3, 19.1) 44 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Harrison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top