Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio No 42.9 (42.5, 43.4) N/A 6,649 falling falling trend -4.7 (-5.6, -3.8)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Adams County No 82.9 (70.5, 97.1) 1 (1, 8) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Vinton County No 71.2 (54.4, 92.1) 2 (1, 48) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Jackson County No 65.4 (54.7, 77.7) 3 (1, 34) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Pike County No 63.3 (52.6, 75.8) 4 (1, 43) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Lawrence County No 62.4 (55.1, 70.5) 5 (2, 29) 55 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Perry County No 62.1 (52.2, 73.4) 6 (1, 42) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Brown County No 62.0 (53.5, 71.7) 7 (1, 39) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Pickaway County No 60.9 (53.0, 69.7) 8 (2, 34) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Scioto County No 60.5 (54.0, 67.8) 9 (2, 29) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Gallia County No 59.3 (49.5, 70.8) 10 (1, 51) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Hardin County No 58.6 (48.1, 70.8) 11 (1, 56) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Hocking County No 58.6 (48.4, 70.5) 12 (1, 58) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Guernsey County No 58.1 (49.7, 67.7) 13 (2, 47) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Meigs County No 57.7 (46.5, 71.0) 14 (1, 64) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Clinton County No 57.0 (48.4, 66.9) 15 (2, 54) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Fayette County No 57.0 (46.9, 68.9) 16 (2, 61) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Ross County No 56.9 (50.4, 64.0) 17 (3, 38) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Preble County No 55.8 (47.4, 65.4) 18 (2, 62) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Morgan County No 55.5 (42.3, 72.1) 19 (1, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Logan County No 55.1 (47.1, 64.3) 20 (2, 55) 35 stable stable trend -14.0 (-26.9, 1.3)
Highland County No 53.8 (45.6, 63.1) 21 (3, 62) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Ashtabula County No 52.8 (47.5, 58.7) 22 (7, 49) 75 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Carroll County No 52.7 (43.2, 64.0) 23 (2, 74) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Marion County No 51.0 (44.5, 58.3) 24 (6, 63) 46 stable stable trend -13.7 (-26.2, 1.0)
Licking County No 50.4 (46.3, 54.8) 25 (13, 50) 115 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Belmont County No 49.6 (43.5, 56.4) 26 (9, 67) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Morrow County No 49.2 (40.6, 59.4) 27 (5, 78) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Crawford County No 49.1 (41.6, 57.8) 28 (7, 76) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Jefferson County No 48.9 (43.1, 55.5) 29 (10, 69) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Clark County No 48.7 (44.3, 53.3) 30 (15, 60) 96 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Richland County No 48.5 (44.0, 53.4) 31 (15, 60) 88 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Columbiana County No 48.0 (43.2, 53.3) 32 (15, 65) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Clermont County No 47.8 (44.0, 51.7) 33 (18, 59) 126 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Harrison County No 47.4 (36.2, 61.8) 34 (3, 87) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Paulding County No 47.4 (36.1, 61.5) 35 (3, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Champaign County No 47.3 (39.3, 56.6) 36 (8, 80) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Madison County No 47.0 (39.1, 56.1) 37 (8, 80) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Athens County No 46.8 (39.6, 55.0) 38 (11, 79) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Muskingum County No 46.7 (41.3, 52.7) 39 (16, 72) 55 falling falling trend -10.2 (-15.4, -4.7)
Allen County No 46.5 (41.4, 52.0) 40 (17, 71) 64 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Trumbull County No 46.4 (43.0, 50.1) 41 (22, 61) 146 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Sandusky County No 46.1 (39.7, 53.3) 42 (14, 77) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lucas County No 46.0 (43.4, 48.6) 43 (25, 58) 251 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Ottawa County No 45.6 (38.6, 53.9) 44 (12, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Montgomery County No 45.0 (42.8, 47.3) 45 (30, 59) 329 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.0)
Washington County No 44.3 (38.5, 51.0) 46 (18, 79) 43 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Defiance County No 44.2 (36.6, 53.1) 47 (13, 84) 24 stable stable trend -16.8 (-34.6, 5.9)
Darke County No 44.0 (37.5, 51.5) 48 (15, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Seneca County No 43.6 (37.2, 51.0) 49 (17, 82) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Tuscarawas County No 43.5 (38.6, 49.0) 50 (22, 78) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Butler County No 43.4 (40.7, 46.3) 51 (31, 69) 195 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.3)
Knox County No 43.2 (37.1, 50.2) 52 (19, 82) 37 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Shelby County No 42.9 (35.8, 51.1) 53 (17, 83) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Williams County No 42.7 (35.1, 51.6) 54 (15, 85) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Stark County No 42.6 (40.2, 45.2) 55 (37, 70) 236 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Miami County No 42.0 (37.5, 47.0) 56 (27, 81) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Lake County No 41.6 (38.6, 44.8) 57 (37, 75) 146 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Hamilton County No 41.4 (39.6, 43.3) 58 (44, 71) 408 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.3)
Fulton County No 41.3 (34.1, 49.8) 59 (18, 86) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Coshocton County No 41.2 (33.8, 49.9) 60 (19, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Huron County No 41.1 (34.8, 48.3) 61 (23, 84) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Portage County No 41.1 (37.2, 45.2) 62 (34, 79) 87 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Lorain County No 40.9 (38.2, 43.8) 63 (40, 76) 177 falling falling trend -9.3 (-13.4, -5.0)
Henry County No 40.6 (31.9, 51.2) 64 (16, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Summit County No 40.3 (38.3, 42.5) 65 (47, 75) 301 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.7)
Cuyahoga County No 40.3 (38.9, 41.7) 66 (50, 73) 706 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.7, -2.9)
Fairfield County No 40.0 (36.1, 44.3) 67 (36, 82) 78 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.7)
Erie County No 39.8 (34.9, 45.3) 68 (31, 84) 49 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Van Wert County No 39.6 (31.3, 49.7) 69 (18, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Mahoning County No 39.4 (36.5, 42.5) 70 (45, 79) 143 stable stable trend -0.7 (-12.7, 12.9)
Franklin County No 39.4 (37.8, 41.0) 71 (53, 77) 493 falling falling trend -8.4 (-14.5, -1.9)
Wyandot County No 39.0 (30.0, 50.3) 72 (14, 88) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Wayne County No 37.2 (33.0, 41.9) 73 (43, 85) 59 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Ashland County No 36.5 (30.6, 43.3) 74 (36, 88) 28 falling falling trend -8.6 (-14.9, -1.8)
Greene County No 36.2 (32.7, 40.0) 75 (55, 85) 80 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Monroe County No 36.0 (25.8, 49.8) 76 (15, 88) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Wood County No 35.7 (31.6, 40.3) 77 (52, 87) 55 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.8)
Medina County No 35.5 (32.2, 39.1) 78 (58, 86) 88 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Warren County No 35.0 (31.9, 38.4) 79 (61, 86) 95 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.6, -2.9)
Noble County No 34.7 (24.1, 49.4) 80 (16, 88) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Hancock County No 34.6 (29.6, 40.3) 81 (51, 88) 35 falling falling trend -7.7 (-14.2, -0.6)
Auglaize County No 33.7 (27.6, 41.0) 82 (43, 88) 22 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.1, -0.9)
Union County No 33.3 (26.8, 40.8) 83 (42, 88) 19 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.8, -3.7)
Geauga County No 31.4 (27.4, 35.9) 84 (70, 88) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Mercer County No 31.0 (24.7, 38.7) 85 (50, 88) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Holmes County No 30.8 (24.0, 38.9) 86 (50, 88) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Putnam County No 28.5 (22.0, 36.6) 87 (62, 88) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Delaware County No 27.4 (24.2, 30.8) 88 (81, 88) 58 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.2, -4.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top