Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 46.7 (46.2, 47.2) N/A 6,983 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.8)
United States *** 38.5 (38.4, 38.6) N/A 149,208 falling falling trend -5.0 (-5.4, -4.5)
Adams County *** 74.6 (62.7, 88.3) 1 (1, 24) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Brown County *** 74.5 (64.9, 85.3) 2 (1, 16) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Jackson County *** 70.6 (59.4, 83.6) 3 (1, 32) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Perry County *** 67.2 (56.6, 79.3) 4 (1, 39) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Vinton County *** 63.2 (47.5, 83.0) 5 (1, 78) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Guernsey County *** 61.8 (53.0, 71.9) 6 (1, 51) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Meigs County *** 61.7 (50.1, 75.6) 7 (1, 68) 21 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Pickaway County *** 61.5 (53.5, 70.5) 8 (1, 45) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Pike County *** 61.5 (50.8, 74.0) 9 (1, 64) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Logan County *** 61.4 (52.7, 71.3) 10 (1, 54) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Lawrence County *** 61.1 (53.8, 69.3) 11 (2, 43) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Ross County *** 60.9 (54.2, 68.4) 12 (2, 40) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Scioto County *** 59.8 (53.2, 67.0) 13 (2, 42) 62 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Hardin County *** 58.3 (47.7, 70.8) 14 (1, 72) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Gallia County *** 57.3 (47.6, 68.7) 15 (2, 74) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Marion County *** 57.1 (50.1, 64.9) 16 (3, 57) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Morrow County *** 56.9 (47.3, 67.9) 17 (2, 72) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Crawford County *** 56.3 (48.2, 65.6) 18 (3, 68) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Highland County *** 56.2 (47.8, 65.9) 19 (2, 71) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Fayette County *** 56.2 (46.0, 68.2) 20 (1, 78) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Muskingum County *** 56.0 (49.9, 62.6) 21 (4, 54) 64 falling falling trend -11.1 (-20.5, -0.6)
Ashtabula County *** 55.9 (50.4, 61.9) 22 (5, 52) 78 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Jefferson County *** 55.2 (49.0, 62.2) 23 (5, 60) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Clinton County *** 54.8 (46.2, 64.6) 24 (3, 73) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Preble County *** 54.7 (46.4, 64.3) 25 (3, 71) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Hocking County *** 54.0 (44.2, 65.6) 26 (2, 79) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Clark County *** 53.5 (48.9, 58.5) 27 (9, 57) 102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Carroll County *** 53.4 (43.8, 64.8) 28 (3, 79) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Allen County *** 53.4 (47.9, 59.4) 29 (7, 62) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Licking County *** 53.1 (48.8, 57.7) 30 (11, 56) 116 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Champaign County *** 52.8 (44.2, 62.8) 31 (4, 78) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Washington County *** 52.7 (46.2, 60.0) 32 (7, 71) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Defiance County *** 52.3 (43.8, 62.2) 33 (4, 79) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Madison County *** 51.8 (43.3, 61.5) 34 (4, 79) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Morgan County *** 51.4 (38.5, 67.9) 35 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Clermont County *** 51.4 (47.4, 55.6) 36 (14, 60) 129 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.7)
Belmont County *** 51.2 (45.0, 58.0) 37 (10, 74) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Athens County *** 50.0 (42.4, 58.6) 38 (8, 81) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Lucas County *** 49.3 (46.6, 52.2) 39 (24, 62) 261 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Shelby County *** 49.2 (41.5, 58.1) 40 (7, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Richland County *** 48.9 (44.3, 53.9) 41 (18, 73) 86 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lorain County *** 48.8 (45.7, 52.0) 42 (24, 65) 199 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Knox County *** 48.6 (42.1, 56.0) 43 (11, 80) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Williams County *** 48.4 (40.3, 57.9) 44 (7, 84) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Montgomery County *** 48.3 (46.0, 50.7) 45 (29, 62) 345 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Trumbull County *** 48.3 (44.8, 52.0) 46 (25, 71) 149 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.0)
Monroe County *** 48.2 (36.2, 63.8) 47 (3, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Columbiana County *** 47.9 (43.1, 53.1) 48 (19, 76) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Darke County *** 47.6 (40.7, 55.5) 49 (13, 83) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Henry County *** 47.3 (37.9, 58.6) 50 (6, 85) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Miami County *** 47.2 (42.3, 52.6) 51 (19, 77) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Tuscarawas County *** 46.7 (41.6, 52.5) 52 (21, 79) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Seneca County *** 46.7 (39.9, 54.5) 53 (15, 83) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Butler County *** 46.6 (43.7, 49.7) 54 (33, 72) 198 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.0)
Harrison County *** 46.4 (35.0, 60.9) 55 (5, 88) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Hamilton County *** 46.3 (44.3, 48.3) 56 (38, 69) 446 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.6, -2.2)
Stark County *** 45.7 (43.2, 48.4) 57 (36, 73) 249 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Portage County *** 45.4 (41.3, 49.8) 58 (31, 79) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Sandusky County *** 45.3 (38.9, 52.5) 59 (19, 83) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Huron County *** 45.2 (38.4, 52.8) 60 (18, 85) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Lake County *** 45.1 (42.0, 48.5) 61 (35, 76) 154 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Franklin County *** 45.0 (43.3, 46.8) 62 (44, 72) 537 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -2.8)
Paulding County *** 45.0 (34.1, 58.6) 63 (6, 88) 12 stable stable trend -11.3 (-23.6, 2.8)
Cuyahoga County *** 44.6 (43.1, 46.1) 64 (47, 72) 764 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Wyandot County *** 44.3 (34.4, 56.4) 65 (9, 88) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Warren County *** 43.5 (39.8, 47.4) 66 (41, 81) 108 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Coshocton County *** 43.1 (35.4, 52.2) 67 (18, 87) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Ashland County *** 43.0 (36.5, 50.5) 68 (23, 86) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Fairfield County *** 42.9 (38.7, 47.4) 69 (39, 83) 79 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.2, -1.5)
Ottawa County *** 42.8 (35.9, 51.0) 70 (23, 86) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Erie County *** 42.6 (37.5, 48.4) 71 (33, 85) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Summit County *** 42.1 (40.0, 44.4) 72 (54, 79) 305 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.7, -3.2)
Mahoning County *** 42.1 (39.1, 45.4) 73 (48, 82) 148 falling falling trend -9.8 (-15.9, -3.2)
Fulton County *** 41.7 (34.3, 50.3) 74 (23, 87) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Union County *** 40.6 (33.2, 49.1) 75 (24, 88) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Van Wert County *** 40.5 (32.1, 50.7) 76 (21, 88) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Hancock County *** 40.2 (34.7, 46.4) 77 (37, 87) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Wood County *** 40.0 (35.5, 44.9) 78 (47, 86) 59 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.4, -1.5)
Greene County *** 38.8 (35.1, 42.8) 79 (58, 86) 82 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Medina County *** 38.6 (35.1, 42.5) 80 (59, 86) 90 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Wayne County *** 37.2 (32.9, 41.9) 81 (60, 87) 57 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.7, -2.3)
Holmes County *** 36.3 (28.7, 45.3) 82 (37, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Mercer County *** 36.0 (29.0, 44.3) 83 (42, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Auglaize County *** 35.6 (29.3, 43.0) 84 (51, 88) 23 falling falling trend -12.7 (-22.3, -2.0)
Noble County *** 33.4 (24.3, 46.2) 85 (34, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Putnam County *** 31.8 (24.8, 40.3) 86 (61, 88) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Geauga County *** 31.0 (27.0, 35.6) 87 (79, 88) 44 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Delaware County *** 30.4 (26.9, 34.1) 88 (81, 88) 59 falling falling trend -7.5 (-10.5, -4.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/13/2021 3:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top