Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio No 21.0 (20.6, 21.5) N/A 1,712 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Defiance County Yes 11.1 (6.4, 18.6) 79 (43, 79) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.1)
Crawford County Yes 12.5 (7.8, 19.6) 78 (24, 79) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.2)
Gallia County Yes 14.0 (7.7, 24.0) 77 (6, 79) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Perry County Yes 14.9 (8.5, 24.5) 76 (5, 79) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Van Wert County Yes 14.9 (8.7, 24.7) 75 (8, 79) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Mercer County Yes 15.1 (9.2, 23.7) 74 (7, 79) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Hancock County No 15.4 (11.0, 21.2) 73 (18, 79) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Medina County No 16.2 (13.2, 19.7) 72 (33, 78) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Fulton County No 16.3 (9.8, 25.6) 71 (5, 79) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Greene County No 16.6 (13.4, 20.5) 70 (25, 78) 19 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Seneca County No 16.8 (11.4, 24.0) 69 (7, 79) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Brown County No 16.8 (11.1, 24.8) 68 (5, 79) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.8)
Muskingum County No 17.4 (12.8, 23.1) 67 (11, 79) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Athens County No 17.5 (11.5, 25.6) 66 (4, 79) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Delaware County No 17.5 (14.2, 21.3) 65 (20, 77) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Mahoning County No 17.7 (15.1, 20.7) 64 (28, 75) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Williams County No 17.8 (11.7, 26.8) 63 (3, 79) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Jackson County No 18.1 (10.9, 28.6) 62 (2, 79) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Ross County No 18.2 (13.1, 24.8) 61 (5, 79) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Jefferson County No 18.4 (13.5, 24.8) 60 (7, 78) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Logan County No 18.4 (12.0, 27.3) 59 (2, 79) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Huron County No 18.4 (12.6, 26.1) 58 (3, 79) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Lake County No 18.4 (15.6, 21.7) 57 (20, 76) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Geauga County No 18.4 (14.3, 23.7) 56 (10, 77) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Richland County No 18.9 (15.0, 23.7) 55 (9, 77) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Belmont County No 19.0 (13.8, 25.7) 54 (4, 78) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Ashland County No 19.3 (13.4, 27.2) 53 (2, 79) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Knox County No 19.3 (13.8, 26.5) 52 (4, 78) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Union County No 19.4 (13.0, 27.8) 51 (2, 79) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Shelby County No 19.4 (12.9, 28.2) 50 (2, 79) 6
*
*
Allen County No 19.8 (15.2, 25.4) 49 (5, 77) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Marion County No 19.9 (13.7, 27.9) 48 (2, 78) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Columbiana County No 19.9 (15.6, 25.2) 47 (6, 76) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Coshocton County No 19.9 (13.2, 29.4) 46 (1, 79) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Darke County No 20.2 (14.5, 28.0) 45 (3, 78) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Miami County No 20.4 (16.0, 25.7) 44 (5, 75) 16 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Butler County No 20.5 (18.0, 23.4) 43 (11, 67) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Trumbull County No 20.6 (17.3, 24.3) 42 (9, 71) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Putnam County No 20.7 (12.9, 31.8) 41 (1, 79) 5
*
*
Franklin County No 20.7 (19.2, 22.3) 40 (19, 60) 148 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Wood County No 20.7 (16.3, 25.9) 39 (5, 75) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Sandusky County No 20.8 (15.2, 28.1) 38 (2, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Warren County No 21.3 (18.0, 25.0) 37 (7, 70) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lucas County No 21.4 (19.0, 24.0) 36 (10, 61) 62 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Champaign County No 21.4 (14.3, 31.2) 35 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Clermont County No 21.4 (18.0, 25.4) 34 (6, 68) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Licking County No 21.7 (18.0, 26.0) 33 (5, 69) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Summit County No 22.0 (19.9, 24.3) 32 (10, 55) 87 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Portage County No 22.0 (18.1, 26.6) 31 (4, 69) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Adams County No 22.1 (14.0, 34.0) 30 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.7)
Hamilton County No 22.1 (20.3, 24.1) 29 (11, 52) 118 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Stark County No 22.3 (19.8, 25.1) 28 (7, 59) 64 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Tuscarawas County No 22.4 (17.7, 28.1) 27 (3, 71) 17 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.6, 2.7)
Lorain County No 22.5 (19.7, 25.6) 26 (6, 58) 51 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Montgomery County No 22.5 (20.4, 24.9) 25 (7, 52) 87 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Fairfield County No 22.6 (18.6, 27.3) 24 (3, 67) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Pickaway County No 22.8 (16.1, 31.5) 23 (1, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Cuyahoga County No 22.9 (21.5, 24.4) 22 (10, 43) 219 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Henry County No 23.1 (14.6, 35.4) 21 (1, 79) 5
*
*
Clinton County No 23.1 (15.8, 32.9) 20 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Ottawa County No 23.2 (16.5, 32.6) 19 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Hocking County No 23.4 (14.7, 35.9) 18 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Erie County No 23.5 (17.9, 30.5) 17 (1, 74) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Preble County No 23.7 (16.2, 33.9) 16 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Washington County No 23.8 (17.8, 31.4) 15 (1, 72) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Morrow County No 24.3 (16.3, 35.3) 14 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Lawrence County No 24.4 (18.1, 32.3) 13 (1, 73) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Ashtabula County No 24.4 (19.6, 30.2) 12 (1, 64) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Wayne County No 24.6 (19.7, 30.5) 11 (1, 66) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Madison County No 24.9 (16.9, 35.6) 10 (1, 76) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Holmes County No 24.9 (16.8, 35.8) 9 (1, 77) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Clark County No 25.2 (20.7, 30.5) 8 (1, 58) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Scioto County No 25.3 (19.4, 32.6) 7 (1, 68) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Highland County No 26.1 (18.0, 36.9) 6 (1, 75) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Auglaize County No 26.9 (18.8, 37.3) 5 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Fayette County No 28.0 (18.3, 41.4) 4 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Pike County No 28.5 (18.5, 42.4) 3 (1, 75) 6
*
*
Hardin County No 28.9 (18.1, 43.8) 2 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Meigs County No 31.4 (20.2, 47.3) 1 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guernsey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 7:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top