Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Prostate, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 19.4 (18.9, 19.9) N/A 1,192 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
United States *** 18.9 (18.8, 19.0) N/A 30,566 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Fairfield County *** 12.3 (9.0, 16.4) 70 (40, 70) 9 falling falling trend -8.6 (-12.8, -4.2)
Defiance County *** 13.3 (7.4, 22.2) 69 (6, 70) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.2)
Clermont County *** 13.3 (10.2, 17.1) 68 (34, 70) 13 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.8, -3.0)
Jefferson County *** 14.0 (9.5, 20.3) 67 (16, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.3)
Marion County *** 14.2 (9.3, 20.8) 66 (13, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.8)
Crawford County *** 14.8 (9.0, 23.2) 65 (5, 70) 4 falling falling trend -5.4 (-6.9, -4.0)
Putnam County *** 15.5 (8.8, 25.7) 64 (2, 70) 3 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.5)
Washington County *** 15.6 (10.5, 22.5) 63 (8, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.3)
Logan County *** 15.7 (9.6, 24.5) 62 (3, 70) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.4)
Ashland County *** 15.8 (10.3, 23.5) 61 (5, 70) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.3)
Coshocton County *** 15.8 (9.1, 25.7) 60 (2, 70) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.9)
Clinton County *** 15.8 (9.3, 25.4) 59 (2, 70) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -1.9)
Portage County *** 16.0 (12.4, 20.4) 58 (12, 70) 14 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.0, -3.2)
Tuscarawas County *** 16.2 (11.8, 21.8) 57 (9, 70) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -2.6)
Sandusky County *** 16.8 (11.3, 24.4) 56 (3, 70) 6 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.0, -3.1)
Columbiana County *** 17.2 (13.0, 22.4) 55 (7, 69) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Clark County *** 17.2 (13.4, 21.9) 54 (9, 69) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.2)
Warren County *** 17.4 (13.8, 21.5) 53 (10, 68) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Wood County *** 17.4 (12.9, 22.9) 52 (6, 70) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Lorain County *** 17.5 (14.8, 20.6) 51 (15, 66) 30 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.9, -2.9)
Mahoning County *** 17.5 (14.6, 20.9) 50 (13, 67) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.2)
Highland County *** 17.6 (10.9, 27.0) 49 (1, 70) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.0)
Lake County *** 17.7 (14.7, 21.1) 48 (13, 67) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Trumbull County *** 17.8 (14.7, 21.5) 47 (11, 66) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Geauga County *** 17.9 (13.4, 23.5) 46 (5, 69) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Preble County *** 18.0 (11.0, 28.1) 45 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Ross County *** 18.3 (12.4, 25.8) 44 (2, 70) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Licking County *** 18.3 (14.3, 23.1) 43 (6, 68) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Brown County *** 18.3 (11.7, 27.7) 42 (1, 70) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.6)
Fulton County *** 18.4 (11.5, 28.0) 41 (1, 70) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.3)
Darke County *** 18.4 (12.4, 26.6) 40 (2, 70) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Williams County *** 18.5 (11.3, 29.0) 39 (1, 70) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Medina County *** 18.6 (14.8, 22.9) 38 (7, 66) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Huron County *** 18.6 (12.2, 27.2) 37 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Greene County *** 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) 36 (5, 67) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Seneca County *** 18.6 (12.4, 27.0) 35 (1, 70) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Scioto County *** 18.7 (13.4, 25.6) 34 (3, 70) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Ashtabula County *** 18.8 (14.1, 24.7) 33 (4, 68) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Miami County *** 19.2 (14.4, 25.1) 32 (3, 68) 11 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.3, -3.2)
Franklin County *** 19.2 (17.4, 21.1) 31 (14, 53) 90 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.6, -2.7)
Butler County *** 19.3 (16.4, 22.6) 30 (8, 61) 33 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Auglaize County *** 19.6 (12.9, 28.9) 29 (1, 70) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.3)
Delaware County *** 19.7 (15.5, 24.7) 28 (4, 66) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Stark County *** 19.7 (17.2, 22.5) 27 (8, 57) 45 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.3)
Summit County *** 20.0 (17.8, 22.4) 26 (9, 52) 61 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.0, -2.7)
Guernsey County *** 20.3 (12.9, 30.7) 25 (1, 70) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.9)
Belmont County *** 20.4 (14.7, 27.7) 24 (1, 68) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Knox County *** 20.4 (14.3, 28.4) 23 (1, 69) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.4)
Erie County *** 20.5 (15.4, 26.9) 22 (2, 67) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Union County *** 20.6 (12.8, 31.2) 21 (1, 70) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.3)
Montgomery County *** 20.7 (18.4, 23.2) 20 (7, 49) 61 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.5)
Lucas County *** 20.9 (18.2, 23.9) 19 (5, 51) 44 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Hocking County *** 20.9 (12.2, 33.9) 18 (1, 70) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.6)
Morrow County *** 21.1 (12.8, 32.9) 17 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Hamilton County *** 21.3 (19.2, 23.5) 16 (6, 42) 83 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.3)
Mercer County *** 21.4 (14.0, 31.6) 15 (1, 70) 5
*
*
Allen County *** 21.5 (16.4, 27.8) 14 (1, 64) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Jackson County *** 21.7 (12.1, 35.7) 13 (1, 70) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.2)
Fayette County *** 21.9 (12.5, 35.6) 12 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Wayne County *** 22.7 (17.8, 28.6) 11 (1, 58) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Madison County *** 22.7 (14.2, 34.2) 10 (1, 70) 5
*
*
Shelby County *** 23.0 (15.5, 33.1) 9 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Hancock County *** 23.2 (17.0, 31.0) 8 (1, 66) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Van Wert County *** 23.6 (14.2, 37.2) 7 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Muskingum County *** 23.7 (17.7, 31.1) 6 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend 25.6 (-1.3, 59.8)
Cuyahoga County *** 23.8 (22.2, 25.5) 5 (3, 21) 168 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Richland County *** 24.8 (20.0, 30.5) 4 (1, 48) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Lawrence County *** 25.3 (18.3, 34.2) 3 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 12.5 (-8.9, 39.0)
Ottawa County *** 25.4 (18.1, 35.3) 2 (1, 62) 8 rising rising trend 54.4 (35.1, 76.4)
Holmes County *** 30.2 (20.2, 43.3) 1 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Athens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Champaign County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickaway County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2021 9:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top